Microsoft hits back at Opera antitrust claims

Microsoft denies abusing its market position, claims IE supports a "wide range of Web standards" and says it has no intention of unbundling IE and Windows.

Opera, based in Norway, last week filed an antitrust complaint with the European Commission, alleging that Microsoft is abusing its dominant position by bundling IE with the Windows operating system.

Bundling IE with Windows means people have no choice in receiving it and only afterward have the option of deleting it or using an alternative product as the default browser, Opera said.

Opera also claimed that Microsoft is hindering interoperability by not following accepted open Web standards.

Microsoft struck back on Friday, indicating that it would not willingly unbundle IE from Windows.

"We believe the inclusion of the (IE) browser into the operating system benefits consumers, and that consumers and PC manufacturers are already free to choose to use any browsers they wish," a Microsoft representative said. "Internet Explorer has been an integral part of the Windows operating system for over a decade and supports a wide range of Web standards."

The Microsoft representative added that "computer users have complete freedom of choice to use and set as default any browser they wish, including Opera, and PC manufacturers can also preinstall any browser as the default on any Windows machine they sell."

Opera filed the complaint against Microsoft last week, asserting that Microsoft has locked consumers into using IE, which has "only recently begun to offer some of the innovative features that other browsers have offered for years," such as tabbed browsing.

"We are filing this complaint on behalf of all consumers who are tired of having a monopolist make choices for them," said Jon von Tetzchner, chief executive officer of Opera. "In addition to promoting the free choice of individual consumers, we are a champion of open Web standards and cross-platform innovation."

Opera asked the European Commission to force Microsoft to unbundle IE from Windows and to carry alternative browsers preinstalled on the desktop. Opera also asked the EC to require Microsoft to follow "fundamental and open Web standards accepted by Web-authoring communities."

The browser company asserts that Microsoft's "unilateral control over standards in some markets has created a de facto standard that is more costly to support, harder to maintain, and technologically inferior and that can even expose users to security risks."

Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 7 comments

  1. While their at it... Anonymous -- 17/12/07

    Maybe Microsoft should also remove Paint, notepad, wordpad, calculator, outlook express, Windows media player and remote desktop. After all, there are third parties who develop products which do the same things as these.

    It would be like asking BMW not to include seats in it's cars because there are third party seat manufacturers capable of providing seats.

    1. puprosefully flinked Anonymous -- 17/12/07

      Your analogy is wrong. In regard to your BMW (not that you could compare windows to a BMW) , it would be impossible to change the seats without destroying the car, however you can put someone else's seats AS WELL AS the originals. get it? You can't remove IE, you can remove paint and calculator and the other applications you are complaining about. This is purposefully done by Microsoft and what the complaint is all about.
      If you want an analogy about this, how would you feel if your BMW had advertising on the side of the car and you couldn't remove it without destroying it?

    2. Why Not John -- 17/12/07

      BMW has been running some of its inbound car systems on XPe

    3. john you're back! Anonymous -- 17/12/07

      Still playing the microsoft trumpet I see.

    4. While their at it... Anonymous -- 01/01/08

      Yes they should, or at least allow me to remove them. If I want an OS for work why do I need paint, media player etc? Even RDC is not needed in most cases.

  2. This is silly Yves -- 17/12/07

    Why would an operating system not come with a browser made by the OS creator? You need one to get on the net.

    Why would Microsoft add someone else's browser when they've finally poured so much money to fix theirs?

    I don't even like Microsoft, but i can see how silly Opera is being. Find other ways to become profitable, Mozilla did it.

  3. Opera Having a Whinge Boochan -- 17/12/07

    Maybe if Opera didn't require people to PAY for their browser (or get the free version with ads) up until a few years ago they wouldn't have faded into obscurity. I don't see the much more popular alternative to IE, the Mozilla Foundations firefox having a whinge about IE been included. Besides, Windows 95 and 98 came with primitive IE and during that time Netscape had a huge (though dying) market share, right up until 1999. Maybe if Opera didn't require for users to pay for its browser (unless you wanted it riddled with ads) right up until last year, then it might have a bigger share then the slowly shrinking 1% it has now.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Alex Serpo Will the NSW Govt put Linux in schools?
    The NSW Government's release this week of an expressions of interest tender to give low-cost laptops to every senior public school student in NSW is a big step, but will these systems be Windows or Linux?
  • Array Naked Mac versus protected PC: What wins?
    What's easier to manage — 200 Mac OS X systems without antivirus or 200 Windows systems running a leading antivirus package?
  • Array Dear Telstra: pack up your toys, go home
    Rejecting Telstra's proposal, after all, is the only conclusion Conroy can reach: as someone whose entire philosophy is built around transparency and process, he simply cannot keep Telstra as part of the NBN bidding process anymore.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured