Linux advocate takes another swipe at Windows TCO

Linux provider Cybersource has updated its two year old study comparing the total cost of ownership (TCO) when using Microsoft's products against open source solutions -- only to find that Linux is still cheaper.

The study comes after a wave of similar "independent" studies that have been commissioned by Microsoft or its partners and indicate that proprietary software is cheaper than open source solutions. Microsoft has been actively marketing the results of these studies as part of its Get The Facts campaign.

Con Zymaris, Cybersource's chief executive, said that although the company is identified as a Linux solution provider, it has "made a great effort to prepare a balanced and open analysis".

"The prices used for the study, along with research methodology, vendor specifications, cost calculator tabulations and final results are all included, so that these results can be verified by others. Which is more than we can say for any of the TCO reports that Microsoft touts in its current carpet-bombing anti-Linux advertising campaign," said Zymaris.

According to the latest study, entitled 'Linux vs. Windows TCO Comparison: The Final Numbers Are In', for a company with 250 users, Linux solutions will cost between 27 percent and 36 percent less than Microsoft's products over a three year period.

The numbers are based on hardware, software, networking, staffing, consultancy fees, Internet access, desktop productivity applications, training and miscellaneous system costs. In its updated report, which was first published in April 2002, Cybersource has also included a comparison with paid-for solutions from Red Hat.

In an effort to gain further credibility, Cybersource says it gave Microsoft a 'head start' by ignoring the costs of dealing with viruses and any costs associated with downtime resulting from reboots and crashes. Additionally, the company said it has tripled the budget for external Linux consultants because one of Microsoft's arguments is that open source requires an -increased reliance' on them.

Zymaris said that organisations and many governments are investigating the Linux option and it hopes the study will make the decision easier.

-The final numbers are startling. We've given Microsoft every head-start possible but Linux's cost advantage is simply too great for most organisations to ignore," concluded Zymaris.

The full report is available in PDF format from the Cybersource Web site.

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    cannot open the link........bodes well for a linux systems integrator......Anonymous -- 13/12/04

    cannot open the link........bodes well for a linux systems integrator......

    Could be because it's being hit by thousands of downloaders.... try the "Cache' instead: http://www.cybersource.com.au.nyud.net:8090/about/linux_vs_windows_tco_comparison.pdfAnonymous -- 14/12/04

    Could be because it's being hit by thousands of downloaders....

    try the "Cache' instead:

    http://www.cybersource.com.au.nyud.net:8090/about/linux_vs_windows_tco_comparison.pdf

    yep, you get slashdotted you get slashdotted. no matter what your setup. If it not load balanced multi web servers and enough bandwidth what can you do. thanks for the cache link, got it. I like their approach. give M$ a headstart, taking away most thingsAnonymous -- 14/12/04

    yep, you get slashdotted you get slashdotted. no matter what your setup. If it not load balanced multi web servers and enough bandwidth what can you do. thanks for the cache link, got it. I like their approach. give M$ a headstart, taking away most things people always argue about when they have these TCO comparisons, and Linux still comes out tops. Stuff we knew all along. Nice to see these things properly researched.

    Just found this mirror; http://mirror.iinet.net.au/~cybersrc/linux_vs_windows_tco_comparison.pdfAnonymous -- 14/12/04

    Just found this mirror; http://mirror.iinet.net.au/~cybersrc/linux_vs_windows_tco_comparison.pdf

    I'm neither for or against Microsoft and I think I offer an unbiased vision of desktop support as I've worked in the industry for 20 years specialising in SOEs. The biggest issue to overcome with the migration to Linux has to be the support forAnonymous -- 15/12/04

    I'm neither for or against Microsoft and I think I offer an unbiased vision of desktop support as I've worked in the industry for 20 years specialising in SOEs.

    The biggest issue to overcome with the migration to Linux has to be the support for existing legacy applications. I have yet to see a company with no legacy apps.

    ****uming that 50% of your desktops don't have legacy apps and can be changed to Linux, the next issue is compatibility between users. For example I have seen presentations done where Open Office didn't display exactly the same as MS Office. I'm sure this is just one example of the subtle differences, I'm sure they can be overcome but at what cost?

    In a Greenfield site, this stands up, ****uming the company doesn't require legacy applications and can live with pure Linux applications.

    I would like to see the report expanded to include a Citrix style solution to deal with the legacy apps that just can't work on Linux, and need to be used. I would be pleasantly surprised if the Linux desktop was still cheaper.

    Great work, I look forward to the next do****ent in the series.

    It's always hard to be objective and non-discriminatory when compiling these TCO reports if you have a foot in either camp. I'd just like to see some real-world facts and figures from people who have made the switch that clearly demonstrate thAnonymous -- 15/12/04

    It's always hard to be objective and non-discriminatory when compiling these TCO reports if you have a foot in either camp.

    I'd just like to see some real-world facts and figures from people who have made the switch that clearly demonstrate the difference in TCO.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett PayPal launches Aussie developer program
    PayPal announced the opening of its certification program for Australian developers today, making Australia the first country outside of the US to offer certification.
  • Array Cash cow in a BigTinCan?
    Around one third of Australia's telcos have shut their doors over time, but that isn't stopping new ventures hoping to chip away at carriers' mobile call bonanza. By fighting carriers at the smartphone rather than the home phone, could the latest two contenders be onto something big?
  • Array A third of the way to a zettabyte
    This week on Twisted Wire we look at how internet usage is changing in Australia and around the world. How are we meeting this demand and how is the cost structure changing for the service provider?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured