Linux KDE 4.2 RC1: Photos

By Alex Serpo, ZDNet.com.au
20 January 2009 10:47 AM
Tags: linux, kde, ubuntu, 4.2

The latest version of the KDE desktop environment, mostly used on Linux, arrived last week (4.2 RC1), with the final product due on 22 January. We had a peek inside to see what this overhaul offers.

Advertisement

Talkback 22 comments

    cool but slow and laggy Anonymous -- 20/01/09

    i really love the cool looks of kde4. its very sleek and feels really intergrated. my only problem with is that most of the transitioning effect can be very laggy.. i use an intel x3100 card which run compiz like liquid. but lags alot on kde4 . hope this is improved. other than that.. kde4 is a step in thenright direction.

    Amazing... Anonymous -- 21/01/09

    Now that Qt is FINALLY under a completely unrestrictive license (now that Nokia owns Qt and not Troll Tech, a much smaller company), I think KDE is set to become the standard Linux DE (desktop environment) and perhaps replace GNOME, to some degree.

    Qt is the graphics library KDE uses, to make all those flasy buttons and graphics. GNOME uses GTK (which has been Open Source Friendly) for all this time... this is why GNOME apps are more numerous than KDE apps...

    But, as I said, Nokia make Qt under the LGPL, with the intention of encouraging more developers to use it, without worry of licenses!

    The future is VERY bright for KDE4.2+ indeed... sure it's intial release was misunderstood... but now the bugs ( for all intensive purposes ) have been ironed out... it only gets better.

    I am even concidering switching from Ubuntu to Kubuntu or some other Distro that uses KDE 4.2+ All the major distros will start packaging KDE4.2+ right away, and finally do away with all the problems of KDE4.0 intial release.

    BTW, you can still run all your GNOME apps(GTK) using KDE, and vise versa.!

    LGPL is MORE restrictive Anonymous -- 22/01/09 (in reply to #320121340)

    It REDUCES user's Freedom, letting proprietary program be linked with the library.
    People should value freedom above all, otherwise they'd better change OS and go in the golden land of Windows or MacOS.
    So LGPL is a sad change

    What? Patrick McCormack -- 22/01/09 (in reply to #320121410)

    Just so I know what the heck you're talking about - what's the difference between GPL and LGPL?

    The difference between GPL and LGPL Guillermo O. Burastero -- 23/01/09 (in reply to #320121413)

    If you use any part of a GPL licensed program, all the new derivated program is under GPL licences too. And LGPL is for librarys. So that you can use it from a private -propietary- program, without it loosing it's propietary license. Example, you can make a propietary cd-write program interfase that calls a LGPL cd-write library.

    Option of licenses Anonymous -- 23/01/09 (in reply to #320121410)

    From what I understood, Qt was being released in a LGPL version, so that there were three different versions available: one under GPL, one under LGPL, and one under mystery license.

    That way, developers have complete freedom in choosing a license.

    Desktop Mel Sommersberg -- 21/01/09

    It looks awful. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but I find more favour with Windows 7. It is more refined and doesn't pretend to be something it isn't.

    Desktop Anonymous -- 22/01/09 (in reply to #320121354)

    Windows 7 wants to be KDE. Windows 7 has recently been in development and KDE 4 has more than 2 years of development.

    Wrong Mel Sommersberg -- 22/01/09 (in reply to #320121408)

    Windows 7 is not an OS drawn up on a clean sheet, it is more of an update to Vista which has been around for a long time and certainly under development well before the version of KDE being talked about here.

    I can appreciate that people who prefer a Linux OS will obviously prefer the look of KDE though, it's only natural. :-)

    Silly thing to say AndyCee -- 23/01/09 (in reply to #320121457)

    Why not just say that Vista tried to mimic the eye-candy of OSX? Or that OSX was ported over from the original KDE?

    It's silly to say the win7 interface (which I haven't experienced myself) is an update to Vista's, which was drawn up before [b]this implementation[/b] of KDE, hence some kind of 'original'.

    If you're going to make sense, compare Vista's interface with the KDE released at that time. Concurrent evolution can occur in parallel.

    Karamba Anonymous -- 24/01/09 (in reply to #320121457)

    You forget that all this widgets-on-desktop thing was being used in KDE 3, years before Vista were on the design desk, through Karamba/Superkaramba. Plasma has now replaced Superkaramba, but it's definitely not a copy from Vista; maybe from MacOs? I don't know, I'm not a very good Macintosh conoisseur.

    Nice attempt at straying offtopic from the Lunix fanboys Anonymous -- 01/02/09 (in reply to #320121600)

    Why is Vista and OS X being brought up here? Neither are relevant to the discussion.

    That's why it's great to have options, no? Sly Coder -- 21/01/09

    You think that KDE looks awful, and I think that Vista SP2 (aka Windows 7) looks awful.

    But that's why it's great to have options, no?

    If we left things to Microsoft, there would be zero alternatives and no options; just 1 Microsoft Way.

    Why is everything so BIG? Anonymous -- 22/01/09

    Why is everything so BIG? Huge buttons, menus that take up over a third of the screen? Was this done at 640x480?

    I think that's my biggest gripe Windows UI vs KDE/Gnome. I have a 20" monitor running at 1280x1024. It this scale I expect to fit over a dozen icons vertically (yes, I realize icons on your desktop are poo pood in the latest KDE. I'm just using it as an example.) The start/task bar should be a sliver across the bottom. Standard dialog boxes should be less than 1/64th of the screen size, not 2/3 as shown in some of those screen shots.

    I hope the developers include the option to scale things down to more reasonable levels.

    Why is everything so BIG? Anonymous -- 22/01/09 (in reply to #320121398)

    You can or will be able to in some cases. That was one of the reasons why icons are in vector format instead of raster (Pixels)
    Case where you can change icons on the fly is in Dolphin (file Manager) as exhibited in slide 4 above. You can see it way at the bottom of each view. Also, you can change icon size globally or in different areas using the Computer Settings.
    I am pretty sure there will be a lot more new features and enhancements in the future. The developers have been concentrating mostly on reliability and completing features that were in KDE 3.x and are missing from KDE 4.x still.
    I am running Kubuntu 4.2 RC1 and it is very reliable and also fast even on low level hardware. Well, that is my experience.

    article problems Anonymous -- 22/01/09

    I'm not trying to nitpick, but windows aero is the state of off loading graphics operations to the graphics card, thus running your desktop via rendering 3d operations, not the vista sidebar. Thus, plasma is more equivalent to the sidebar and its widgets and has nothing to do with aero.

    Also, most of the features are adding back features that existed in previous kde versions. In rewriting code for qt4, some code had to be rewritten and features were lost. This release is a major portion of reviving those lost features such as right click logout, multi line taskbar, and auto hiding the taskbar.

    article problems Anonymous -- 23/01/09 (in reply to #320121401)

    Just to correct you, aero feature is not "state of the art" as MacOS X has already did this before and so is compiz on Linux.

    To top it up , kwin4 does "off-load" it graphics to the hardware if the driver allows it.

    Reading problems Anonymous -- 01/02/09 (in reply to #320121558)

    You can't read. He said "state of off loading". It would have been better to say "act" or "idea", but it's still valid.

    It's also worth noting that Aero, and other parts of the DWM, are state of the art in my respects. OSX, for example, does not support an OS level scheduler for the GPU. You know more about marketing than computers... as well as English, it seems.

    now? Anonymous -- 22/01/09

    "and the taskbar can now auto hide."

    The taskbar was able to auto-hide and go huge-ugly at least as far back as 3.5.

    And so its back again... Anonymous -- 25/01/09 (in reply to #320121403)

    So its back again after being absent in 4.0 and 4.1. They're just telling you the feature is back again...

    a little ajax? Anonymous -- 22/01/09

    c'mon. do i really need to reload the whole page for just a pic?

    Poor screenshots Anonymous -- 25/01/09

    As far as appearance goes, KDE 4.2 is beautiful and highly theme able, so if you don't like the way it looks you can change it, or create your own theme.

    These screenshots are in fact among the worst I've seen. There are plenty of other sites that give you decent screenshots that give you some idea how nice and shiny KDE 4.2 really is.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured