Is Bill Gates a great leader?

commentary How would you rate Bill Gates' leadership qualities?

Both Gates, and the company he founded with mate Paul Allen, have come a long way since Microsoft's humble beginnings in 1975.

Fran Foo, ZDNet Australia managing editor

Ten years ago, Microsoft employed 20,561 people all over the world. Today, that figure stands at roughly 64,000. It continues to make billions in net income but its share price has been suffering, especially since a certain start-up called Google went public.

Over the years, Gates has been the public face of Microsoft. From spruiking MS-DOS to expressing the desire to "dominate" the Internet, he is, by far, the world's most famous nerd.

There's no question this uber geek has done very well for himself. After announcing that he hopes to step back from his full-time role at Microsoft, it's good to see that he plans to increase his involvement in charitable organisations (although Gates isn't as cool as Bono, the needy don't discriminate).

I didn't attend his last Sydney press conference (although a colleague did) ... needless to say, security was super tight and you couldn't enter without some form of identification (on that note, I wonder who has tighter security -- Gates or Bono?).

While Gates may not have the "wow" factor of a rock musician, there's something about this bloke that makes people stand up and take notice. Some of my mates in Redmond and other Microsoft offices, who have been in his presence before, liken him to a god (well, almost).

No, they don't say things like, "His code crunching prowess is awesome!" Rather, it's the real admiration of the man's achievements and how he carries himself (that's what they tell me at least). And although he's rated the world's richest man by Forbes magazine, with an estimated wealth of US$50 billion, somehow I don't think his money is the first thing that strikes them about Gates ... it seems there's genuine respect for him, and this is something of which not many CEOs share, unfortunately.

Do you think Bill Gates has done a good job running Microsoft? Is he a good leader in your eyes? Who do you think is Australia's Bill Gates? E-mail me at fran.foo@zdnet.com.au and share your thoughts or talkback below.

Fran Foo is ZDNet Australia managing editor.

Advertisement

Talkback 39 comments

    Bill Gates Great? Anonymous -- 21/06/06 (in reply to #120136354)

    I personally don't see it. What exactly has microsoft invented or innovated over the last 10 years?

    Bill missed the boat on biggies like the internet and games consoles and only because of vast sums of money sucked from their other cach cows, have manage to stay in the game where most others would have dropped out.

    Keep paying your Microsoft tax and you can soon get a new version of an OS and Office, radical!

    can't fault him except in the fairness dept Anonymous -- 23/06/06 (in reply to #120136355)

    I don't think you could fault him in any category except fairness. His monopolistic tendencies would have distressed many an entrepreneur and employee but then again it is a competitive dog-eat-dog capitalist system and the benefits to society are immeasurable let alone the benefits to MS shareholders and employees.

    Is he a good leader........He's have to be a visionary leader and of course he would have had plenty of help implementing the latest management innovations; just read his book. He would have to be categorized as one of the great leaders of the global IT industry as well, not necessarily a genius in cutting code but certainly a genius at understanding the markets he plays in and developing products that have changed the way everyone thinks and works. He's up there with the founders of HP, IBM, Apple, Netscape etc.

    Australia's version? I don't think we have anyone in the IT industry that compares with Gates but in terms of having global effect and building an empire from little or nothing, you couldn't go wrong with Frank Lowy or the elder Packers. Too early yet to tell how well James will do!

    meh Anonymous -- 25/06/06 (in reply to #120136490)

    You're quite the crawler, aren't you ?

    The Packers are scum, may Kerry rot in hell the fat b$astard.

    James Packer lost $500 million Anonymous -- 25/06/06 (in reply to #120136490)

    James Packer lost half a billion on the One-Tel shonks. Frank Lowy made his fortune by screwing the small retailers in his shopping centres. Just ask some of them.

    pffffttttt.... Anonymous -- 21/06/06

    quit with the canonisation.

    Gates was born into money and influence. His mum got him the gig with the IBM bigwigs. He sold them a product he didn't even have so he scrambled to buy something from anyone fast. He took no real risks as if Microsoft didn't pan out he had his big fat trust fund to fall back on.
    He bought some other guys product and cleverly stitched up IBM to ship it with all their machines as they thought the cash was in the hardware.
    Gates and Ballmer then hit upon the idea of selling the same thing over and over and over again...licensing and the "upgrade" rip-off cycle.
    Microsofts history is full of rip-off's, questionable business tactics and illegal bahaviour. Microsoft is a convicted monopolist by the way.
    The Microsoft/Intel duo managed to stall out PC development by 10 years.
    Is Gates a smart man?....of course, you don't get 50 billion by being stupid.
    Did Gates and Microsoft get so successful by being innovative, industry leading, inventive and dynamic?..absolutely not! Add a dash of luck, some Old School Tie connections, a lawyers sneaky tricks and enough cash to buy out or bury any competition and you get Microsoft.

    Totally agree Anonymous -- 03/07/06 (in reply to #120136356)

    Totally agree with you on that. Gate's success was very exagerrated

    he's no genius Ken Gau -- 22/06/06

    I don’t think of “genius” or “presence” when I think of Gates. I think pirate or bank robber. I’ve been in IT long enough to remember Netscape, Lotus 1-2-3, Word Perfect, Novell, and countless others who’ve been pillaged by Gates and his crew. Microsoft does not make quality products, they steal business models, use their position to push them out and hold a monopoly with an inferior an product. There is a lot of blood on their hands when most people only look at their success.

    Yes, we gained market stability with them in the lead of most software markets, but we also gained crappy code that fails us so often that we’ve grown to expect it.

    When I think of Gates, I think of dishonesty and not playing fair. Yes, he won but the way he did it speaks volumes. If he got to where he is because XP or 2k3 server was the best OS out there then I’d agree with you. Nice guys finish last, and he’s way out ahead of the rest of us.

    sorry but... Anonymous -- 23/06/06 (in reply to #120136421)

    Sorry, but I thought the idea of being in business was to make money? As for holding back computer development, what a load of “bollocks”. If anything, by making the home pc so much more accessible for the average user, it has spurned on the uptake and therefore the innovation for the home pc.

    Are you on crack ? Anonymous -- 25/06/06 (in reply to #120136507)

    The point of business isn't just to "make money" as you put it.

    And no, he didn't do squat to make PC's more reachable or affordable...quite the opposite.

    Gates hasn't been responsible for a damn thing of any note except ride on the coat-tails of others and steal their ideas and their work for his own bloated coffers.

    Microsoft has been a blight on the computing landscape for far too long now.

    Really? I'd call that Genius Anonymous -- 01/07/06 (in reply to #120136421)

    " I’ve been in IT long enough to remember Netscape, Lotus 1-2-3, Word Perfect, Novell, and countless others who’ve been pillaged by Gates and his crew. "

    Funnily enough, I would call that a spot of genius. This got him $50 billion. Serious, would you try to reinvent the wheel? Would a genius attempt to reinvent the wheel or use it?

    Gates, beer and Manly beach Brendan Helsham -- 22/06/06

    Yes, I think Bill is a great leader. There are many aspects to him that make him a great leader. One thing that stood out to me was his ability to know exactly what was happening in every product group in Redmond, who was responsible for what and why a certain delay occurred etc.

    I actually worked for Microsoft between 1993 & 2000 and met him a couple of times....one time we were standing out the back of the old North Ryde Office in a small group, having a quiet beer and chatting with Bill for about an hour. It was inspiring and fascinating. Overall though, he is a down to earth kind of guy.

    As an anecdotal story to show that Bill is a normal kind of guy, back in my time at Microsoft, one of the old timers told me of a funny story about Bill. When the company was much smaller (late 80's), one of Bill's visits to Australia culminated in them going on a pub crawl around Manly. Apparently, Bill had had too much to drink and started giving a bit of lip to a bouncer at Manly Rugby Club, and they ended up having to drag him away before the bouncer punched him.

    As for Australia's Bill Gates....there's only one Bill Gates. Just like there's only one Bono....

    Just good at making money Anonymous -- 22/06/06

    How many copies of Windows are there? 100 million? 200
    million?

    If Windows became a subscription service which only cost
    $50/yr (instead of $200 a pop) then that would indicate a
    total revenue of $500 million to $1 billion a year... just
    for one piece of software!

    This would mean people have a definate reason to purchase his software, they are not locked into a high up front price (knowing the next version is just around the corner and will make your investment worthless), and the company will still be able to maintain its development (who couldn't develop software for $1 billion a year!!!).

    So do I think bill gates is a good leader? I think he is
    good at making money, he is good at keeping himself in
    business... but I dont think he understands what "fairness" is or how to improve the world as a whole. With $50 billion at his disposal, he could donate to charities until the cows come home... bottom line is that he isn't efficiently using the power at his disposal to do anything else other than ensuring that power stays with him.

    I don't agree Anonymous -- 23/06/06 (in reply to #120136423)

    What a load of rubbish. The man donates more money personally than some entire countries do (including the UN). Of course he is a very rich man. There is nothing wrong with that. There are other people who are very rich, who donate a lot less money than he does. As far as his leadership goes, I guess he must be good at something to get to where he is. And as for the other comment further up somewhere, that his mom got him into IBM, well? So be it. It's not a crime. IBM didn't have to buy what he offered. And the dude who sold his idea to him did not have to sell it. Fact is: Gates was there when it counted. He somehow ensured that his company (which apparently only makes rubbish software?!) is now the largest software company in the world. He himself became the richest man in the world for the last 10 years. Do you people honestly think he would have gotten there without being good at what he does? You must be joking!! He might not be a genius, but he is certainly not an evil man. I don't see Steve Jobbs giving away billions of dollars (and he certainly would have them too!). Or giving away his OS for free. No he even forces you to buy the hardware to go with the software. How oppressive is that. Compared to that Gates is an angel.
    So stop whinging about Gates' wealth and get on with your life.

    rubbish. Anonymous -- 25/06/06 (in reply to #120136500)

    Gates is a thief.
    He's stolen untold billions and occasionally drops a few crumbs back onto the table (but ONLY if you sign your country up for a zillion new Windows licences in the process.)

    He's cost the consumer untold billions in downtime, crashes, reboots and licence fees.

    He and his cohorts have stifled and crushed most of the true innovation in the personal computing world.

    The World would have been better off without Bill Gates.

    If you are so worried... Anonymous -- 01/07/06 (in reply to #120136564)

    If you are so worried about the Windows operating system costing bucketloads, then why not switch to Linux/Mac - oh wait? That's right - they are worse for downtime and retraining people! If Windows is so terrible, don't use it!

    I'd like to see anyone go a week without any microsoft product (including using it on another computer/server).

    Been there, done that. Anonymous -- 02/07/06 (in reply to #120136968)

    Along with countless others (who are actually given the choice) I made the switch long ago.

    I haven't booted into Windows in years, have no need too.

    There is NOTHING I can't get done via Mac/Unix/Linux/BSD or any one of a dozen MS alternatives out there.

    Better luck next time chump.

    Me too Anonymous -- 07/07/06 (in reply to #120137011)

    I made the switch too, and similarly to you, I haven't booted back into Windows since. I have no reason to. OpenOffice is perfect, and the development applications are 1000x better than windows will ever have. The fact that I can open a console and do ANYTHING with one command makes me never want to touch windows again.

    I run my desktop for weeks without restarting. The only time i ever do is by CHOICE, not by some BSOD that appears when i try and open notepad. The fact that I can restart my window manager with a 3 finger-salute (variation) to reallocate ram without needing to reboot will never be possible on windows, and until it is.. i dont want to know about it.

    Why fork out $200 for a buggy OS which crashes after a few days when i can use a free OS which never crashes... nuff said.

    $200 for a buggy os for... Anonymous -- 07/07/06 (in reply to #120137329)

    Pretty obvious, applications designed to function properly in Windows. I don't see Adobe Premiere for Linux, I don't see many commercial Games for Linux, I don't see extensive Wireless support for Linux, I don't see extensive Graphic support for Linux. Well, not one where I have to recompile the kernel with new drivers for both video and wireless. Microsoft Windows has these and as for you never booting Windows, have you ever used a Windows PC since the switch?

    I agree Tom Ray -- 14/07/06 (in reply to #120137651)

    Plus:

    * One can use _many_ WINDOWS wireless card drivers on linux with ndiswrapper! I have ASUS WL-138G working on Centos 4 flawlessly with - guess what - Windows driver!

    * You can run Photoshop/M$ Office and many many other win stuff with Wine/Crossover office

    * Many games works with Cedega or Wine emulators

    * I even played old Hercules DOS games with dosemu

    * If nothing above help, one can use qemu or free vmware player

    Tom

    You have to be joking. Malcolm Waters -- 02/07/06 (in reply to #120136968)

    Worse in traing and worse downtime ??????? Macs ???? Linux ????

    Well, any credibility you might have had just got shot right out of the window............

    I admin Linux boxes with uptimes running into years....we're lucky to get a week out of any of the Windows XP or 2003 machines.

    That's the Real World sonny, you'll find out about that one day, maybe....finish school first though, ok?

    What downtime are you talking about? Tom Ray -- 14/07/06 (in reply to #120136968)

    Hi,

    I have OS-X, Linux and various Windowses (95,98SE,2000,XP) and all of them work great except WIndows (ah, old buggy and full-of-virus-and-spyware Windows).

    Have you ever tried OS-X or Linux (or you are just another hard core Windows user)? You should also know that Linux is mostly used by professionals - he is a bit harder to learn, but simply much better than Windows!

    OF COURSE WE WON'T USE WINDOWS.
    You ask why? Well, no antivirus needed for Linux...

    Cheers,
    Tom

    Good leader yes, evil or not who knows? Richard -- 28/06/06 (in reply to #120136500)

    The question was "Is Bill Gates a good leader"? He certainly has been an effective leader judging by the success of Microsoft. This is independant of whatever you may think of his company's software or ethics.

    What other qualities are there of a good leader? Are his staff satisfied and motivated? From what little I've heard I think so.

    Whether Bill Gates has been a benefit or a cost to the world is a completely different question. In answer to your assertion that his donations make up for any misdeeds - how many of those donations are in the form of Microsoft licenses at low marginal cost to him? How many happen to coincide with agreements to switch to Windows in government systems? How many would result in a lot of people becoming tied into Windows infrastructures in their ongoing lives?

    I hope that now Bill is leaving Microsoft more of the donations will be independant. I'd hope that he'd donate to (say) an AIDS research charity even if they continue to do their research on Linux systems. I'd hope that he didn't even worry what systems the charity or the government were running if his public aim is to support AIDS research.

    I do feel sad Anonymous -- 22/06/06

    Much as we all like to blast Gates/Microsoft, I do feel a little sad that he's stepping down. There is a lot (of good) to be said about Microsoft not just as a tech organisation but as an organisation with a social conscience.

    I can't think of any other tech organisation that has done more for any needy cause. Nor any either CEO in that space that has done the same. I somehow don't see Larry Ellison having the same heart. I'm sure John Chambers etc do a lot behind the scenes, but we have to remember people of profile have to champion the cause, which is why Bruce Willis, Bono, Angelina Jolie, etc do what they do.

    I just wonder if Microsoft will have that same heart when Bill goes away.

    Bill Gates commands a lot of respect compared to other executives.

    On the technology front, as much as I **** about the MS product…I'd be bitching a lot more if I still had to use Lotus Notes or eudora.

    Bill Gates is a marketing genius Lance -- 23/06/06

    Bill Gates is a marketing genius. That is his strength.

    There are much better operating systems on the market, but he gets the lion's share through effective marketing.

    the facts Anonymous -- 23/06/06

    "No he even forces you to buy the hardware to go with the software. How oppressive is that."

    OS available when buying a Dell - Operating System: "Genuine Windows® XP Home Edition - the home version of the world's favorite software, Genuine Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005 - Experience photos, music, movies and games to the fullest, Genuine Windows® XP Professional - Dell recommends Windows® XP Professional for business."

    OS available when buying a HP -
    Windows XP Home
    Windows XP Media Center
    Windows XP Professional

    Notice a pattern? Do you see Linux or OS X on that list?

    "which apparently only makes rubbish software?!"

    I'm writting this reply on beta 2 - Vista, so I know what Microsoft nextgen OS can do.

    now compare Vista to this, http://youtube.com/watch?v=RK_WLVO-TgA&search=3d%20desktop

    which do you find for more innovative? and don't even get me started on FireFox vs. IE7.

    Is Gates a good leader? Is Hitler or Genghis Khan a good leader? Well if the ends justifies the means, then I guess he is.

    This I see... Anonymous -- 24/06/06

    I once did not have a good impression of Bill Gates. However, I have changed quite a bit. Did Bill Gates changed, did we misunderstand the same Bill that has always been, or is he putting on a new sheep skin? What I do understand and know is that he is doing lots of good for the human race through his charitable work.

    Recently, I heard on the news that he has given close to "half" his wealth up to this point and he is going to devote a major part of the rest of his life to charity. If this is so, I am REALLY impressed. It is not easy for a middle class individual to give to charity. And it is harder for the wealthy to give a similar percentage to charity. Have you given to or volunteer for charity? When is the last time you done so? I do not recall ANY CEO in the past 100 years has given this much.

    I agree that MS does not always have the best product or the most advance innovation. However, may I ask "Is life only about creating the best product or developing the most advance innovation? What is the end game for those innovations? Money for your pocket? Sufficient money for your effort and return a good portion to the community through charitable work?" I am "not sure" those who built the best products or most advance innovation will be as charitable as Bill Gates is. I am not negating the importance of good products and innovation. However, I have seen quite a few people focus on good products and innovation solely and to the point as if it is a score card promoting one self-worth. "I am better and more capable than you" "I make more money..." I really appreciate Bill Gates taking "Action" to share his wealth and time with the less fortunate.

    Bollocks Anonymous -- 25/06/06

    There's a lot of people here who don't seem to be able to separate Bill Gates the MAN from Bill Gates the BUSINESSMAN.

    As a MAN, it's awesome, and honorable that Gates has decided to dedicate a very sizeable percentage of his billions to charity. I'm sure the tax benefits of giving so much money away to charity have nothing to do with it. The fact is the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation does amazing and grounbreaking charity work, period.

    As a BUSINESSMAN, Gates and Microsoft are convicted monopolists, using dirty tricks and marketing muscle at every turn. Anyone who genuinely believes ANY flavor of the Windows "Operating System" (Being older than 12, I am one of a handful who remember when it was just a kludgy "add-on" on top of the kludgy stolen "MS-DOS" Operating system) is in any way 'innovative' doesn't know their computer history.

    Windows has always been a "Catching up" product, from the original which was shipped as an answer to the Macintosh (marking the very first time Steve Jobs recieved his first ****-f***ing from Bill Gates, in the business sense), from all the kludgy cobbled together versions of Windows 95 - ME, which were designed to somehow monopolise the emerging popularity of the Internet. Windows NT and Server products were somehow designed to monopolise the server market (poorly written piles of **** and when industry didn't buy into that ruse, they unleashed NT onto the rest of us as XP - a decent excuse to buy a more powerful -everything- due to the madly increasing system requirements.

    Now with "Vista" (remember when it was called "Longhorn"? Still waiting), we're going to get all the "features" that OS X had since NeXTStep (early 90's people!). OS X has been shipping those features for five years - now Microsoft will "innovate".

    No way. Bill Gates the BUSINESSMAN is not a visionary, or a great leader, or an ethical man, he's just a damn used car salesman, and nobody will say that because to do so would be admitting you've all been duped by him.

    Incidentally - him starting a fight with a bouncer? That's supposed to make my opinion of him GO UP? How fscking stupid and aggressive do you have to be to get into a fight with a bouncer?

    No, he's just an ivy league jock with great contacts.

    he was just lucky Anonymous -- 26/06/06

    before MS have their UI based OS get out the market, TRON
    was already being used/supported by the Japanese makers.
    TRON was free of charge and was included as the OS of the
    PCs for the certain period, until US politicians pressured the
    Japanese administration that it should be not be the case.
    (I forgot the term for such case). that law did support MS in
    marketing their product as the Japanese makers were a bit
    pressured to support "US" products in the form of MS OS.
    billy was just lucky that the US administration was on his
    back, if not, MS OS wouldn't have been supported by the
    major Japanese makers anyway... TRON should now have
    been the major free OS.

    Great man - no question Mike Absalom -- 28/06/06

    Great man - no question. Fantastic achievements. Charitable philanthorpist - wow.

    But on the other hand... Microsoft has got us by the proverbial goolies! Not at all comfortable with that!

    Bill Gates Successful Leader -> Yes Rex Alfie Lee -- 01/07/06

    His ideas have inspired us all. We're all impressed by the man. What we would have done if we could have reverse engineered all of the good quality operations software coming from other comanies that needed to work with the operating system, even if ours was sublimely inadequate? What genius could have swept aside so many others so deliberately & ignored by the Gov't because of all the money that organisation brought into the US at tax time? Which person could be basted (yeah yeah) enough to carry through schemes that would decimate the competition by a process of osmosis of their product into MS, leaving them worthless? What cunning & forethought to eliminate the need for these pieces of software so that any rivals who might have had a chance are dissolved before they can?

    Incredible! This reminds me of the the story about who wanted to be boss, which part of the body. Then when the anus got involved the others laughed so the anus closed up...... (you can find the rest of the story at
    http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Lagoon/9819/boss.html)

    Yes Anonymous -- 02/07/06

    Before Microsoft, I could not afford any decent Computer hardware or software - although I was a DP manager of a large factory in the 1970's. Before Microsoft, Oracle wanted at least half a million $ for a DBMS. Sun wanted $30,000 for a Workstation etc. etc. Novell $30,000 a Netware 386 file server.

    I still prefer Gates to "suckers" from Oracle, IBM, Apple, SUN, Novell or others who now want to promote "Open Source".

    Gates did his best to make PC affordable and useful to me. Others may make better products than him. But Microsoft products are reasonable enough for most people - that make Gates a great leader.

    Its a Funny Wolrd John -- 02/07/06

    Bill Gates is evil and monopolistic. Interestingly enough in a free market, capatilistic world he is the king. He has grown from nothing to push out all competition in his market space. This is a true capitalists nirvana. Then becoming so successful through the marketspace he plays in suddenly he is evil etc. I could understand the communists or socialists saying this as anti capitalism is the mantra but too all the rest he is the absolute capitalist. We just can't stand the fact he did it from nearly nothing, years before Linus existed and didn't release his source code.

    Bill your the best at what you do, and it shows us all what capitalism is all about...kill off and beat all competitors

    Totally agree Anonymous -- 03/07/06

    I totally agrr with you on that. Gates succes was greatly exagerated.

    Stupid question Anonymous -- 06/07/06

    just because someone makes a lot of money with an idea has nothing to do with leadership, its a stupid question. Gates is a **** my sargaent is a leader there is no comparism

    Gates is way tougher John -- 07/07/06 (in reply to #120137312)

    Bill is significantly tougher than any military leader. If you talk to MS staff who have been grilled and regrilled in presenting a product update, especially when Bill wasn't happy about the update you would know he was no meek and mild pussycat but a ferocious leader who expected the best all the time

    Taking Over The Internet Robert Ray Hedges -- 09/07/06

    Search MSN search window copy paste.... Taking Over The Internet
    into
    http://search.msn.com/

    How come Billy isn't on top in his own search engine?

    Taking Over Search Robert ray Hedges -- 14/07/06 (in reply to #120137503)

    Taking Over Search: Netscape was Eaten by MicroSoft, Then Google Search Ate MicroSoft!

    Taking Over Search with Immortality will eat Google
    because it will never be cool to create children just to let them die!

    Billy Boy, Broken car... Anonymous -- 14/07/06

    Bill is the successful leader of the worst company in the world regarding product quality. He is like very rich car manufacturer, with millions of cars sold worldwide, but his kind of car crash once in month due to bad engineering and quality (despite the fact that he has many of the best engineers and factories in the world ;( )

    Looks like his cars are for sheeps (not for humans) to me.

    Regards,
    Tom

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured