IT giants accused of exploiting open source

Major companies that sell open source software have been accused by a top EU official of treating open source developers as mere subcontractors.

A senior figure at the European Commission launched an outspoken attack on several major American IT firms on Monday, accusing them of exerting too much influence on the progress of the open source community.

Jesús Villasante, the head of software technologies at the EC's Information Society and Media Directorate General, said that big companies such as IBM, HP and Sun are just using the open source community as subcontractors rather than encouraging the community to develop independent commercial products.

"IBM says to a customer, 'Do you want proprietary or open software?' Then [if they want open source] they say 'OK, you want IBM open source.' It is [always] IBM or Sun or HP open source," asserted Villasante, speaking at a debate on open source innovation at the Holland Open Software Conference in Amsterdam.

"Companies are using the potential of communities as subcontractors -- the open source community today [is a] subcontractor of American multinationals," added Villasante, who called on the open source community to develop more independence from these large companies.

"Open source communities need to take themselves seriously and realise they have contribution to themselves and society. From the moment they realise they are part of the evolution of society and try to influence it, we will be moving in the right direction," said Villasante.

Villasante's comments appeared to startle his fellow panellists, including James Baty, a vice-president at Sun. Experts have previously argued that major corporations such as IBM have made a valuable contribution by supporting open source software, as they have helped to persuade businesses and IT professionals that open source software is a credible alternative to proprietary options.

Baty did not respond directly to Villasante's comments, but said that companies such as his have a responsibility to contribute to the open source community. Sun contributes to a number of open source projects, including the open source productivity application OpenOffice.org.

"There are companies that are takers from the open source community, other companies are taking the attitude that they have to contribute," said Baty. "[Open source] should be seen as an opportunity, not as something to capture and abuse."

Villasante used his keynote speech earlier in the day to express concerns about the European software industry.

"What I think is that Europe doesn't have a software industry today -- the only one we have today is in America. In the future we may have China or India. We should decide if we will have a European software industry in the future," he said.

Villasante argued that open source is vital to the development of the European software industry, but that its progress has been inhibited by pressure from intellectual-property lobbyists and the traditional software industry, and by the fragmentation of the open source community.

"Open source is a complete mess -- many people do lots of different things. There's total confusion today," Villasante said.

A member of the audience pointed out that the European Commission was partly responsible for pushing through the software patent directive, which many believe will damage open source. Villasante responded that not everyone at the EC automatically supports this directive.

"Firstly, I'm not responsible for software patents -- the software patent directive is managed by the director general of Internal [Market]. The opinion of the director general of Information Society [the division where Villasante works] is not necessarily the same as the director general of Internal."

ZDNet UK's Ingrid Marson reported from Amsterdam. For more coverage from ZDNet UK, click here.

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    He may as well said: "Today's society is a complete mess -- many people do lots of different things. There's total confusion today," Villasante said. No difference.Anonymous -- 01/06/05

    He may as well said:

    "Today's society is a complete mess -- many people do lots of different things. There's total confusion today," Villasante said.

    No difference.

    Quote: The opinion of the director general of Information Society [the division where Villasante works] is not necessarily the same as the director general of Internal." Europe, put your house in order. This is ridiculous! E.Anonymous -- 01/06/05

    Quote:
    The opinion of the director general of Information Society [the division where Villasante works] is not necessarily the same as the director general of Internal."

    Europe, put your house in order. This is ridiculous!

    E. J. van Waasdijk

    It's a mess because Open Source developers aren't getting jobs. If we were getting paid to do this you would see a much greater concerted effort. It's just a fact.Anonymous -- 02/06/05

    It's a mess because Open Source developers aren't getting jobs. If we were getting paid to do this you would see a much greater concerted effort.

    It's just a fact.

    Open source development seems chaotic as a whole, but that's an illusion. There are many areas within the "open source community" that are extremely orderly in terms of the processes used and the local organization employed. Look at FAnonymous -- 02/06/05

    Open source development seems chaotic as a whole, but that's an illusion. There are many areas within the "open source community" that are extremely orderly in terms of the processes used and the local organization employed.

    Look at FreeBSD, for example. While not GPL software (it uses the BSD license), FreeBSD uses a cl****ic "cathedral" development model where only a few chosen experts have any ability to check in changes, and where the direction of the project as a whole is directed by a small group of extremely knowledgable people (at least in terms of their own local project).

    Most open source projects also tend to do development specifically to scratch a specific itch, not to meet the needs of a corporation. While it's true that often the requirements of a given project's developers and some corporate interest often coincide, I think it's misleading to state that corporate interests are directing those projects. There may be some influence in some cases, but for the most part open source is being developed in the directions *it* wants to go, not in some direction dictated by corporate interests.

    Well, it seems that no one agrees that the Open Source community is "just a mess". I was wondering what he was talking about there - it's less of a mess than it was 15 years ago. A lot of people fail to realize that it's an entire market of itAnonymous -- 02/06/05

    Well, it seems that no one agrees that the Open Source community is "just a mess". I was wondering what he was talking about there - it's less of a mess than it was 15 years ago. A lot of people fail to realize that it's an entire market of it's own. I guess when you say 'market' these days people think 'money' and completely forget about the social aspects of markets.

    What seems to happen is that corporations will put money into developing software if: 1) they see a cooperative development strategy of that particular software as a benefit to them 2) if you approach an entity with a well-presented business plan and tell them how you're going to make money while using an Open Source model for software creation.

    Personally I think the best thing would be for IT departments which do not use a commercial package such as RedHat or Suse to make some contribution to the projects which they benefit from. These contributions of course can never be mandatory - otherwise this is nothing more than a 'shareware' model - and we all know that shareware is nothing but a euphemism for 'commercial and closed source'.

    Exploiting? Its the other way around. Many if not all open source developers want people to use open source products as widely as possible and happily volunteer their time and expertise to make software worthy of wide use. If the likes of IAnonymous -- 02/06/05

    Exploiting?
    Its the other way around.
    Many if not all open source developers want people to use open source products as widely as possible and happily volunteer their time and expertise to make software worthy of wide use.
    If the likes of IBM and HP promote open source, they are happy!
    I would say some in the open source movement are actually exploiting vendors' desire for a Microsoft alternative by devoting their energy to open source projects so they use FOSS as an anti-MS weapon.

    Villasante may have somewhat of a point here but perhaps he could have waited until Open-Source is out of the woods before barking at major resources that have not only supported Open-Source but also lead the way for this community to become recognised glAnonymous -- 15/06/05

    Villasante may have somewhat of a point here but perhaps he could have waited until Open-Source is out of the woods before barking at major resources that have not only supported Open-Source but also lead the way for this community to become recognised globally. His voicing off at this stage of the game, whilst legalities are difficult can only be seen as "looking a gift horse in the mouth" and "biting the hand that feeds it".

    Perhaps at a later date when Open-Source has a stable industry involvement, then attempt to get the likes of IBM & Sun Microsystems to not take advantage of Open-Source but while the pay-back they receive for supporting Open-Source is not actually a handsome ROI, perhaps Open-Source is the real beneficiary.

    In short Villasante, you are a knob!

    Dear Anonymous, The fact that you haven't the guts to show your name shows your inadequacy of argument in this exchange but the fact that you had nothing to say that made any sense at all persuades me to think that you are just another MicrosoftAnonymous -- 15/06/05

    Dear Anonymous,

    The fact that you haven't the guts to show your name shows your inadequacy of argument in this exchange but the fact that you had nothing to say that made any sense at all persuades me to think that you are just another Microsoft user who really doesn't have any idea of what they are talking about.

    What do you actually know Anonymous?

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • David Braue Will Rudd's bush backhaul bonanza deliver?
    Rural areas will be welcoming the government's decision to put its money where its politicising is, funnelling $250m into a regional fibre upgrade to six rural centres. Remedying over a decade of near-neglect at the hands of telecoms privatisation, the investment could be the firmest step yet for Labor's NBN dream — but with inevitable political questions and a looming election, Rudd and Conroy need to deliver, and quickly, to preserve the NBN's credibility.
  • Array Doing for AV what VoIP did for telephony
    Sydney-based start-up Audinate is making traditional analog cabling obsolete in favour of TCP/IP-based networking technology. And it's doing a pretty good job so far, with its technology used by World Youth Day and the Sydney Opera House.
  • Array WiMax in Australia: Part two
    WiMax could be the standard that drives the next phase of mobile broadband, it provides an opportunity for players wanting to establish a pure IP network to carry voice and data effectively — but is this what operators want?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured