IE7 gets tabs but does it matter?

commentary 1997 was a defining moment for Microsoft in its quest to dominate the browser market.

After five months in beta, Internet Explorer 4.0 made its debut in October 1997. Three days later, it recorded its one millionth download.

IE4 was then the underdog with Netscape Communications' Navigator holding nearly 60 percent of the browser market share. By the end of that year, the battle between the duo had intensified to a point of no return.

In time, Microsoft clawed its way up the ladder and in doing so, managed to wipe out any real competition from Netscape -- which was acquired by America Online for US$4.2 billion [in stock] in November 1998.

Fast forward to 2005 and Microsoft is still in the picture.

These days, the browser war is largely between IE and Firefox -- the Mozilla Foundation's open-source offering; its origins can be traced back to 1998 when Netscape Communicator was open sourced.

Two years ago, the foundation received US$2 million in start-up support from America Online's Netscape division and the story keeps getting better for Firefox -- it will soon hit 57 million downloads.

Market share figures comparing both browsers vary considerably. Some research firms put Internet Explorer 6 at 90 percent and Firefox with 5 percent. Others such as Janco have said the Microsoft product has an 84 percent portion, while Mozilla's offering sits at 11 percent.

Whoever you believe, the fact is Firefox has put a fire under IE. As for Microsoft, it hopes to widen the gap with a new version of Internet Explorer.

In February, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates announced that the company was working on IE7, with a beta launch slated for this September.

Gates didn't divulge much except to say that the browser would work with Windows XP Service Pack 2. This prompted me to question the availability of such a product: was version 7 just another security patch disguised as a "new" offering? Should it rightfully be called IE 6.1 for Windows XP Service Pack 2?

But since then, more light has been shed on the application.

Today, company executives finally confirmed that IE7 would incorporate tabbed browsing -- a feature which made Navigator even more popular in its heyday.

Internet Explorer users have been urging its maker to catch up with Firefox and other browsers like Opera by introducing tabs. Not only has Microsoft finally listened, IE's product manager went a step further by admitting it was a mistake to exclude the feature from its browser in the first place.

"I think we made the wrong decision here initially, and we're making the right one now," said Dean Hachamovitch.

Microsoft's capitulation is to be expected ... it swallowed a bitter pill last week when IBM openly declared it was encouraging employees to start using Firefox.

Market share numbers will always be open to debate but the bigger challenge for Microsoft is in winning the mindshare game. It's already lost so much with a bad reputation for insecure products ... and it will take more than tabbed browsing to convert Firefox users to IE.

Fran Foo is ZDNet Australia managing editor.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 8 comments

  1. Firefox users: Do not switch back to Internet Explorer once Microsoft adds these basic features which has been in competing products for ages. By doing so and reducing Firefox's market share, there will be no reason for Microsoft to improve and innovate Anonymous -- 18/05/05

    Firefox users: Do not switch back to Internet Explorer once Microsoft adds these basic features which has been in competing products for ages. By doing so and reducing Firefox's market share, there will be no reason for Microsoft to improve and innovate in their browser products. Support innovation and continue using Firefox.

  2. It's gonna take a lot more than the addition of a feature I already have for me to move back to IE. Firefox is nicer looking, easier to use, more functional and the integrated search bar - that can be customised - is fantastic. In short - it doesn't matte Anonymous -- 19/05/05

    It's gonna take a lot more than the addition of a feature I already have for me to move back to IE. Firefox is nicer looking, easier to use, more functional and the integrated search bar - that can be customised - is fantastic. In short - it doesn't matter.

  3. You guys are missing the point. Firefox will never be able to compete with MS like netscape once did simply because most users don't care. They get IE bundled with windows on their computers and the vast majority of users are quite content with its feat Anonymous -- 19/05/05

    You guys are missing the point. Firefox will never be able to compete with MS like netscape once did simply because most users don't care. They get IE bundled with windows on their computers and the vast majority of users are quite content with its feature set, speed and stability.
    Most users will never even use tabbed browsing anyway, even if they could.
    IE7 will probably be pushed onto millions of PCs via Windows Update, MS won't have to spend ANY money on getting people to switch to the new version, a situation that Firefox won't EVER be able to compete with.
    FF downloads sit at around 55mil. Well within a couple of days of IE7 being added to Windows Update, we'll be looking at hundreds of millions of downloads of IE7.
    How FF could put a positive spin on that for themselves is beyond comprehension.

  4. They may not care about how they get their browsing experience, but they definitely do care about avoiding popups and self installing malware. That alone should be enough to do it. Andrew Anonymous -- 20/05/05

    They may not care about how they get their browsing experience, but they definitely do care about avoiding popups and self installing malware. That alone should be enough to do it.

    Andrew

  5. The only reason Firefox has 57 million downloads is because we have to download the entire f*cking package for an update or two which is easily fixed via an XPI file. The idiocy is astounding. Its like saying you sold a car every time you fix a lightbul Anonymous -- 21/05/05

    The only reason Firefox has 57 million downloads is because we have to download the entire f*cking package for an update or two which is easily fixed via an XPI file. The idiocy is astounding. Its like saying you sold a car every time you fix a lightbulb in it. I feel safer using MSIE since the Mozilla team disbanded and has only one person coding for the project.

  6. They may not care about how they get their browsing experience, but they definitely do care about avoiding popups and self installing malware. That alone should be enough to do it. Thats what SP2 is for. Anyopne not using SP2 but still using t Anonymous -- 25/05/05

    They may not care about how they get their browsing experience, but they definitely do care about avoiding popups and self installing malware. That alone should be enough to do it.

    Thats what SP2 is for. Anyopne not using SP2 but still using the net is either really stupid, one of those twerps who has it in their minds that SP2 will damage their PC after a few problems were found in the BETA version on a dyed in the wool anti MS nut.

  7. All those people backing IEx, Take it from a MS employee. I am using Firefox & spreading the knowledge because it is the best. Many are finding it useful everyday. I don't give a f*ck to MS Software because they are the best. They just have got a **** Anonymous -- 14/06/05

    All those people backing IEx, Take it from a MS employee. I am using Firefox & spreading the knowledge because it is the best. Many are finding it useful everyday. I don't give a f*ck to MS Software because they are the best. They just have got a ****load of Market Share which is anyways dwindling. Checkout Fedora 4.0. Firefox doesn't mean freedom from MS. It means you are doing what you want to do, & not what somebody is pushing down your throat. Sooner or later, others will romp over them. I am already preparing for that day.

    Long Live Mozilla & Fedora Foundation for giving the freedom to breath, to choose, to live the way WE want.

  8. IE vs FF... Anonymous -- 05/11/05

    Well I would have to agree with the prev. comment. The browser should do what we want to do, but it shudn't be the other way around. FF provides better security, avoids pop-ups, (IE 7 still allows some) and finally IE is still not passed the Acid test, whereas FF has. For designers basically, FF is a dream come true,cuz it shows what u want to show. So in security, flexibility and usability FF beats IE anytime, anyday.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay StartupCamp Melbourne: The review
    StartupCamp Melbourne looks to have produced just as interesting ideas as the Sydney event which immediately preceded it, but the Victorian start-ups appear to have stumbled during execution. Sydney 1, Melbourne 0.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured