Google Chrome: 5 reasons for and 5 against

By Nick Heath, silicon.com
03 September 2008 01:04 PM
Tags: chrome, firefox, google, ie8, mozilla, opera, browse

Google dipped its mighty toe into the increasingly crowded world of internet browsers today with the announcement of Chrome.

After all the polished promises of a streamlined new way to tame the Web, the blogosphere was ready to predict everything from the end of Firefox to the demise of Microsoft itself.

Builder AU sister site silicon.com spoke to industry experts and Google's new rivals to find out why Chrome matters and whether the browser reality can deliver on the hype.

Bye bye Microsoft
Google Chrome has shades of an OS in a browser's clothing and the gradual encroachment on Redmond's turf must have a few Microsoft execs sweating.

The way it will allow users to run and manage applications without an OS' intervention could mean the beginning of the end for the days of Vista's bloatware.

David Mitchell, VP for IT research at analysts Ovum, said: "What you are seeing is the language of the browser coming very close to that of the operating system, with services provided at the browser level rather than the OS level.

"If some of the OS functionality is within the browser then there will be a demand for a more anorexic OS running underneath.

"It is a big step towards telling people like Microsoft that they are not so popular after all."

Google-branded life
Chrome will provide a central point for the company's panoply of services and applications, offering a hub to consolidate everything from Google Maps and Docs to Gmail and Shopping.

Google already has millions of users on Google Apps -- applications from calendaring to video, all hosted on its cloud computing infrastructure, and a Google branded browser is an obvious way to persuade even more users to start experimenting with the company's other Web-based offerings.

Nate Elliott, research director at analysts Jupiter Research, said: "This is not a new idea, they have had the Google toolbar for four to five years with the idea of driving users towards their products and services. Now you will have what is a far bigger and better version of the toolbar to drive users towards those services."

Consumer love-in
Google has proven to be a master of wooing consumers, charming consumers by offering free versions of traditionally paid for services.

With 70 per cent of the world's Web searches going through the search engine, it's built up a brand awareness so strong that the verb "to Google" is already part of the lexicon. It's this popularity that can give Chrome a headstart and quickly turn it into a contender.

Google's history of consumer-pleasing and unfussy design -- think of its sparse, ad-free homepage -- could serve Chrome well. Jupiter Research's Elliott said: "Google products are typically very easy to use and very consumer friendly.

"They focus extremely heavily on this relationship and everything that they do keeps consumers in mind."

Tor Odland, head of communications for rival browser Opera, said: "They have a massive footprint and Google will probably be more successful than another company trying this because of that."

No more lock-ups
It might sound trivial but the ability to kill individual tabs within Chrome will spell the end of the hair tearing frustration of a single rogue Web page bringing the entire browser crashing down.

Not only that but the way the browser will run every tab in an isolated "sandbox" will provide improved protection from malicious sites.

Ovum's Mitchell said: "Each tab is attached to a separate process and can be managed separately.

"It is a bit like what Window NT offered in terms of stability. Most of the current generation of browsers would crash if there was a badly behaved tab but Chrome can quit the tab and it will still work."

Microsoft too is working on the ability to kill a tab and still save the browser, with a similar feature showing up in IE8 beta 2.

If you can't beat them
Google is taking the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach with Chrome, shamelessly borrowing features from its would-be competitors.

These include the open source approach of Firefox; Opera's speed dial function, where a homepage presents thumbnails of your most visited sites; an "incognito" window for private browsing where nothing is recorded, similar to Safari and the forthcoming IE8, and an address bar with auto-completion features.

Opera's Odland said: "It is very much a market where everybody knows what everybody else is doing and you can expect Google to take innovations such as the speed dial homepage and tabs on top from Opera and vice versa."

Not convinced by Chrome? See the five reasons why it may crash and burn on the next page...

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    Bug Report Tom Grimshaw -- 03/09/08

    There is no way to get to the next page of this article, it is missing the [next] link.

    Fixed ZDNet.com.au staff -- 03/09/08 (in reply to #320111188)

    The problem has been fixed.

    Please do let us know if you are still having issues.

    Works in Chrome! Anonymous -- 03/09/08 (in reply to #320111188)

    Maybe time to ditch IE?

    Microsoft's comment Steve Roper -- 03/09/08

    "The browser landscape is highly competitive but people will choose Internet Explorer 8 for the way it puts the services they want right at their fingertips..." yada yada...

    Like hell. People move AWAY from Internet Suxplorer because of all the problems it causes. The ONLY reason it has market dominance is because it is installed as the default browser in all new Windows setups, and FOR NO OTHER REASON. Regardless of what wool-pulling bullshit Microsoft might spout about people choosing Internet Suxplorer, the fact is most people either aren't clued up enough about web browsers or simply can't be bothered changing.

    I just hope Chrome stays W3C compliant and doesn't start introducing its own standards like Microsoft did. If it does deviate, I won't be supporting it on my websites. I have enough problems supporting Suxplorer and W3C browsers as it is.

    chrome vs. adobe miles zarathustra -- 04/09/08

    The 'kill tab' would be cool (if it worked) when chrome attempts to start acrobat. At this point, the only way I've found to view .pdf's reasonably is to save them and view separately.

    Other than that, I didn't see a whole lot better or worse than FF. Just different... which is good.

    It's too bad the average user is so intimidated by the default configuration.

    If M$ were REALLY certain IE is a better browser, they would bundle FF with windows and let users REALLY have a choice!

    Hey Redmond, I dare you!

    Double standards?!? Anonymous -- 09/09/08 (in reply to #320111245)

    Just like FF bundles MS products, and Google has links to both camps product sets on its default page, and lets not forget the new iPhone bundle (hey, they even excluded PullMyFinger - WT?).
    Lets ship the lot and wait for the bloat complaints to come rolling in.
    Whats wrong with consumer choice, why does the world need to follow your vote for the 'best app of the day'?

    Browsers are a commodity item - get over it M@TT -- 05/09/08

    Its just a browser - a tool - a piece of simple technolgy - more effort needs to be put into the other end - the web apps that it accesses.

    This obsession with "safe and secure" browsers is a waste of time perpetuated by techies that need a perfect solution but can't relate to the real world where perfection is a goal that is never achieved.

    Operating systems are also a commodity item - the efforts put into linux should have been put into making Microsoft do it better. But it was too hard for the poor old techies to get out of their caves and relate to normal people.

    A telco is a telco - get over it - its a phone - it rings -- its a data connection - it connects. If all you are worried aboyut is cost, then you will never get any investment in new technologies and never get any improvements.

    Bias Anonymous -- 09/09/08

    Is it me or does this article come across as very biased?

    I mean surely the biggest flaw of Chrome is security closely followed by a heavy resource footprint and the fact that it is just a browser.

    Im not convinced bloatware as the writer puts it is bad. Less is not necessarily more when one talks about software. More services actually could be a good thing.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured