Gartner: Windows collapsing under own weight

Microsoft's Windows juggernaut is collapsing under its own weight, as it tries to support 20 years of applications and becomes more complicated by the minute, according to analyst firm Gartner.

To compound Windows' problems, it has outgrown the hardware it requires and customers are considering skipping Vista and waiting for Microsoft's next-generation Windows 7, the analyst firm has said, adding that, if Windows is going to remain relevant, it will need radical changes.

Speaking at the Gartner Symposium/ITxpo in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Gartner analysts Michael Silver and Neil MacDonald asked the audience whether Microsoft needed to radically change its approach to Windows; around half of the managers and executives gathered in the room raised their hands. "Windows is too monolithic," said Silver.

Silver added that clients have asked Gartner whether they should skip Vista entirely and wait for Windows 7, which promises to be more modular and potentially lightweight in comparison.

Silver said he recommends that IT executives do use Vista, but on an attrition basis, so that, as PCs with Windows XP are retired, they are replaced with PCs running Vista.

MacDonald argued that Windows may need multiple kernels to support increasing demands from customers and hardware makers. "One size doesn't fit all," he said.

If Microsoft is to fix Windows' problems, the company needs to do a number of things, the analysts said. For a start, Microsoft should create multiple versions of Windows for specific uses. These modules would be able to be swapped out, depending on the customer, they said.

"The more interesting question here is whether one OS [operating system] can address [cloud computing and real-time architecture]," the analysts asked. "Microsoft believes that it can take its core Windows software offering and package it to address these different architectures. But can this same approach be extended to embrace cloud computing and real-time architecture demands?"

MacDonald also questioned what the OS will look like once applications are virtualised, and whether a full OS is needed in every deployment. He suggested it was not necessary and that the OS may be taken over by the hypervisor. "Something as common sense as 'I'd like Office to go with me' doesn't work under current licensing," he said.

The bottom line for Gartner is that Windows needs to be replaced, lock-in needs to end and product schedules need to be more predictable, the analysts said, adding that Windows should also be more manageable. The Windows user experience will become less integrated and more "a composite adaptive work space", they said, meaning that some applications will be tied to location and the user's identity.

Credit: Gartner: Windows collapsing under its own weight; Radical change needed from ZDNet.com

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    BloatWare Anonymous -- 14/04/08

    Microsoft has blurred the distinction between Operating System and Application and consequently is splitting at the seams with it's bloatware.

    Another case of trying to control everything and producing mediocrity all around.

    Stating the obvious? Buzz Words Sarah -- 15/04/08

    Ask any user and they will tll you that Windows is bloated and that radical changes are needed.

    Gartner aren't telling anyone anything they don't already know - well except Microsoft perhaps...

    As for "cloud computing and real-time architecture"... What would analyst companies do if they couldn't create/sprinkle new buzz words around each year. IT companies should start delivering the long overdue and bleeding obvious before creating even more hype.

    Boated, and poorly designed... Anonymous -- 22/04/08

    I could go on... after all this time we still don't have a solid, open, reliable, secure, simple, small and easy to use operating system from Microsoft. It is the complete opposite, showing just how out of touch this company is with what people really want, and just how blinkered they are with share price, partners, exclusivity and the bottom line. Big mistake and they are paying for it now.

    Bloated ,and poorly designed... Anonymous -- 23/04/08 (in reply to #320100189)

    > I could go on... after all this time we still don't have a solid, open, reliable, secure, simple, small and easy to use operating system...

    I agree, not from Microsoft. I do! It's Ubuntu Linux :-)

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Phil Dobbie A guide to the future of the internet
    Last week we looked at the history of the internet in Australia. It's been around for 20 years and changed our lives in so many ways. Imagine what it could do given another 20 years.
  • Array Carelessness busts Linux security
    No operating system can ever properly protect a computer from trojans as long as users continue to do silly things. Just because Linux is immune to your standard drive-by viruses it does not mean that it can escape trojan horses.
  • Array Sun shining on Ajnaware
    Graham Dawson talks about the future of iPhone app development and augmented reality.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured