EU software patent law may halt Linux development: Aussie lawyer

Munir Kotadia, ZDNet Australia

01 March 2005 04:54 PM

Tags: software, patent, ec, directive, ciid, eu, law, ip

Should the European Commission formalise the Computer Implemented Inventions Directive, it could seriously affect the development of open source software.

The European Commission (EC) on Monday rejected requests to rewrite the CIID, which although is likely to have relatively little effect in Australia, could seriously damage open source software development in Europe, according to a legal expert.

Jeremy Mark Malcolm, an information technology lawyer specialising in Internet-related law and speaker at the forthcoming Linux conference in Canberra, told ZDNet Australia  that patent laws could damage the European open source development community.

"It may perhaps stop some of the development that is going on in Europe on open source. You may find that some people developing software over there will have to stop doing it because of the threat of being sued over patent violations," said Malcolm.

According to Malcolm, who admits to being against software patents, said there is 'no question' that Linux already violates a number of patents, which could lead to further litigation.

"There is no question that some of the open source software that is out there - such as the Linux kernel itself - has got patent violations in there. That is acknowledged. There is more danger that those potential violations will be litigated," said Malcolm.

The CIID has sparked many months of argument, debate and confusion within Europe. It has yet to be formally adopted by the European Council, but if this does happen the directive will return to the Parliament. The EC spokesman said he understood that the Council is planning to put the CIID on the agenda of the March 7 meeting.

Malcolm said that confusion surrounding the future of software patents is also very damaging to corporates and an early settlement, either way, is necessary.

"What is more important is that we have certainty -- one way or another. Either software patents are allowed or they are not. This has been going back and forth since 2002 and one way or another it has to be sorted out," said Malcolm.

ZDNet UK's Graeme Wearden contributed to this report.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 3 comments

  1. what we need is "confidence". the fud is maintained by those interested in patents aka microsoft and co ... play with fear has been a successful weapon these days. but people will wake up very soon and make a switch in governements ... Anonymous -- 01/03/05

    what we need is "confidence". the fud is maintained by those interested in patents aka microsoft and co ...

    play with fear has been a successful weapon these days. but people will wake up very soon and make a switch in governements ...

  2. Amazing how the moment something bad is talked about OSS or Linux its dismissed as FUD. But if its about MS then you ****es lap it all up! Phathetic! Anonymous -- 02/03/05

    Amazing how the moment something bad is talked about OSS or Linux its dismissed as FUD. But if its about MS then you ****es lap it all up! Phathetic!

  3. Legal certainty may be good, but is unattainable if the directive p****es as proposed because then the only certainty will be that everyone can be sued over just about anything. So, let's NOT rush this highly dubious proposal through the instanc Anonymous -- 09/06/05

    Legal certainty may be good, but is unattainable if the directive p****es as proposed because then the only certainty will be that everyone can be sued over just about anything.

    So, let's NOT rush this highly dubious proposal through the instances, but instead do it right, for bills like this are bound to last with us for at least 10 years to come (but rather 20+ in reality).

    From a marketing perspective, this directive is exactly what the offenders need to kill independent development and free software in Europe. Let's not forget that, and for proof, please all take a sincere look at the FTC hearings when the US first devised such a damaging law.
    So, unless we want to be a US backyard only, we should _NOT_ p**** that bill.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Australian Govt funds IT start-ups
    This week Australia's Federal Government announced it had allocated $3.6 million in funding to 57 local research projects so that they could be commercialised, with many of them being web or IT-related start-ups.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured