Australians would rather deal with a decent speech recognition system than an offshore call centre agent, typically based in India or Asia.
Speech recognition technology has matured to a stage where it can be used to increase the efficiency of a call centre and provide a better customer experience, according to research from Callcentres.net.
Dr Catriona Wallace, director of Callcentres.net, told ZDNet Australia that according to a recent survey carried out by her firm, of 500 Australians asked if they minded speaking with an offshore call centre agent, 67 percent said they did.
"We know there is still a lot of cultural resistance in dealing with offshore contact centres. Australian customers would prefer to speak to a good Australian-accent speech recognition system than an offshore agent," Wallace told ZDNet Australia.
Wallace said that modern consumers are demanding speech recognition technology.
"Generation Y consumers [under 30-year-olds] want quick easy access 24 hours a day from a mobile device. These are the consumers who are going to drive this technology in the future," she said.
However, speech recognition technology isn't being widely deployed by call centre managers because they believe customers would rather stay on hold and speak to a "real person" than deal with an automated system, according to Nick Buckle, chief executive of Information Technologies Australia (iTa), which published the findings of a survey today.
"The general upheld myth is that everyone wants to talk to an agent," said Buckle. "People are really changing their preferences when it comes to contacting organisations."
According to the iTa survey, just over a third of call centre managers believe that all customers would rather speak to an agent than a speech recognition system. Around 29 percent say they have not used a speech recognition system solely because of the cost. However, 62 percent of call centre managers agree that speech recognition systems offer a better customer experience than touch-tone self service systems.
Buckle said that using speech recognition provides companies with a better understanding of what their customers actually want -- because it does not limit them to choosing from a set number of options.
"If you ask 'why are you calling me', you will find out why your customer is actually calling you. It is like continuous customer feedback system," Buckle told ZDNet Australia.
This opinion is partially echoed in research published today by UK-based contact centre firm Converso, which surveyed 2,500 people and found that 86 percent of Brits were not happy about "constantly saying yes or no to an answer phone rather than actually talking to someone".
Converso's survey did not question users if they would prefer speaking to a speech recognition system than using touch tones but the company's director Dino Forte made it clear that customers do not appreciate being made to wait.
"The results show that for the large majority there is still no substitute for the human touch. Good service is all about offering customers the choices they want. Too many companies, especially those that operate online, fail to also offer customers the option of speaking to someone, resulting in frustration and potential loss of business," said Forte in a statement.
iTa's Buckle believes that customers only worry about the service they are receiving -- not if there is a person or computer at the other end.
"The question shouldn't be 'is the organisation allowing you to talk to an operator', it should be 'is the organisation ... providing better value in delivering services when and how you want them'," he added.
Earlier this year, the managing director of speech recognition specialists VeCommerce, Paul Magee, demonstrated in a video interview how speech recognition is being used by Australian betting firm UniTab. Click here to watch the video: Speech recognition systems grow up.
I believe the title for this article is inappropriate at best and bordering on xenophobic. Given that this piece appears on Newsnow (although a UK news portal but with international readership), many of our ASIAN friends will glance at the article's title and may feel agrieved or even outraged. If you are going to publish such a piece in the future, please be very careful at wording the title - they can often be misintrepreted and inflammatory. In other words, cut out the sensationalist BS!