According to open source industry activists, the guide -- being prepared by the Australian Government Information Management Office -- is designed to provide departments and agencies with knowledge of the practical, procedural and policy-oriented machinery necessary to increase the likelihood of success in any open source procurement.
In a posting to Linux and open-source user groups, Cybersource chief executive officer Con Zymaris said the guide would also cover "all appropriate considerations for reducing risk in this relatively new procurement area for the federal government".
Zymaris said the document would not take a pro-FOSS [free-and-open-source] stance, "remaining neutral on this topic".
He said the guide would also provide useful information for purveyors of open source solutions, "to better understand government sourcing needs and processes.
"If you are a vendor in this space and want specific information included, here is your chance".
The commissioning of the guide further reinforces the headway being made by open source software solutions into federal and state governments, although proprietary software heavyweight Microsoft last week described pirated software as a "tougher competitor" to it than Linux and other open-source variants.
Find a more recent story on this issue here











Why do people still prefer Microsoft?
Home users do because of the games. But this is only a small percentage of the market.
Office users do because translating the macros, forms and reports is time consuming and costly.
Australians do because they have been indoctrinated with a need to be looked after.
It is so ingrained that people believe the Government will look after them, despite evidence to the contrary
Even our prime minister subscribes to this need as shown by his willingness to go along with Bush and Gates without questioning the long term effects.
Open Source makes one learn how to look after one's self.
How can Australia break out of this indoctrination?
When that happens, we will become the Lucky Country again.