This story has either expired or is unavailable at the moment. If you require assistance, please e-mail us at edit@zdnet.com.au and we will help track down the story for you.
This story has either expired or is unavailable at the moment. If you require assistance, please e-mail us at edit@zdnet.com.au and we will help track down the story for you.
See our exclusive coverage of the Election 07: Coonan vs Conroy debate
Congratulations!
I'm delighted to see this decision. An attempt to filter such material would have been doomed to a costly, ineffective failure, and I'm glad to see the government recognise that and focus on more effective steps like education.
If we're really lucky, this bout of common sense will carry through to the removal of the software patent clause from the Free Trade Agreement.
Planet CNET: Spins, blurs, and flashing lights
It sounds like a bad acid trip, but on this edition of Planet CNET, we spin in Singapore, get blurred out in F… Watch it now
Australian Customs CIO Murray Harrison dislikes SLAs and runs away if a vendor talks to him about innovation. In this interview, he also explains why getting excited about gadgets can be dangerous and talks about how Customs' outsourcing strategy has evolved.
iPhone suckers test our patience
Westpac bank: AVG's toughest competitor
Will you manage in the exabyte era?
iPhone Launch Centre
The ZDNet.com.au iPhone resource guide contains everything you need to know about Apple's highly anticipated mobile device.
Click here for more.
Superguide: Printers -- all you need to know
Looking to buy a printer? Our superguide rates the latest printers and shines a light into the industry.
Click here for more.
Power Centre: Transforming IT Management
Driving business growth through enterprise IT management.
Dig deeper by clicking here.
What absolute rubbish.
It's not about filtering Internet porn from kids ... people looking for this material are hardly likely to buy a filter from their ISP to filter themselves out ... a ridiculous argument.
Between the consumer and the site or newsgroup being accessed, ISPs and carriers are profitting. Carriers have lawful interception obligations and abilities on telephony, why not on Internet / Data?
Carriers / ISPs are 'doing a Kazaa' at the moment ... "Oh, we just supply the road, we don't control how fast people go, what they drive, or whether they are registered or not."
The government MUST do something here. If small ISPs can't afford to filter, they should not be in business. What other business is there that the government says, "oh, it's illegal, but we can't tell them to do anything about it because they will go broke". Organised crime must be thrilled with this precedent!