ZDNet UK surveillance report: Who's watching?

13 October 2000 03:00 PM

Tags: surveillance, privacy, government, police, sack, communications, encryption, zdnet

Do you use the Net and wonder if what you are doing, or saying, even in private emails, are being inspected by hidden eyes? Do you worry about it?

Today ZDNet UK News launches "Surveillance", a News Special that examines the reasoning behind government plans to snoop on our electronic com-munications. It probes leading industry experts and asks what are the true motives behind the plans, which could be in place as early as next year.

The government and police say access to communications is necessary in the fight against crime and terrorism, privacy groups claim it is a breach of civil liberties. Even the Home Office concedes "intrusive activity cannot respect an individual's privacy."

Jane Wakefield and Will Knight look at the technology, the rows and the secrets behind one of the most controversial steps a British government has taken this digital age.

Surveillance is a huge topic so there's a lot to read. For an easy to digest overview, with links to the stories, read on:

An overview:

Via the e-communications bill -- formerly the e-commerce bill -- and the Interception of Communications Act (IOCA) the government plans to keep tabs on us online. These two bills are at the heart of the argument over surveillance in Britain.

Neither bill is yet law but the government plans to push them through in this parlia-mentary session.

See: Government plans e-surveillance

UK Home Secretary Jack Straw will get a wake-up call on the e-communications bill this morning -- and civil liberties organisation Stand hope it will be the police knocking at his door. In a stunt designed to illustrate how the proposed legislation reverses the burden of proof, Stand wants to persuade the government to rethink its plans. Read what Stand is saying.

See: Straw petitioned on commerce bill controversy

And: An open letter to Jack Straw

According to lawyers, both the e-communications bill and IOCA contravene the European Convention on Human Rights. The government denies this but concedes that interception interferes with privacy. Privacy advocates argue that because government snooping goes on in secret, no one can question what is happening.

See: Is e-privacy a human right?

The police claim they need interception powers to fight crime but privacy experts think they are taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut. As a police officer and privacy advocate battle it out it be-comes clear the police are not fully aware of the extent of the powers being proposed as an-other agenda emerges.

See: Privacy versus policework -- the debate

Employers are increasingly turning to technology to keep an eye on us at work. Is surfing the Internet being used as an excuse for sacking people? ZDNet finds a worrying precedent is being set by recent sacked-for-surfing cases.

See: How your boss is watching you

And: Net surfing could get you sacked

And finally for all those without a PhD in encryption, ZDNet News guides you through the minefield of encryption and decryption technologies. And if, having read all these articles, you are feeling a little paranoid, take comfort. Encryption is the enemy of surveillance so if you want some privacy, use it.

See: How encryption works

Take me to Surveillance News Special.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 0 comments


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay StartupCamp Melbourne: The review
    StartupCamp Melbourne looks to have produced just as interesting ideas as the Sydney event which immediately preceded it, but the Victorian start-ups appear to have stumbled during execution. Sydney 1, Melbourne 0.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured