Intel, IBM announce new chipmaking techniques

By
12 December 2000 10:13 AM
Tags: transistor, chip, intel, micron, ibm

Intel and IBM have announced separately new semiconductor technologies and manufacturing processes that could produce chips 10 times faster than those now available.

The two companies, rivals in portions of the chip industry, made the announcements at the International Electronic Design Manufacturers show in San Francisco.

One of the biggest goals in the chip industry is to cram more and more transistors onto a smaller silicon chip, which boosts power and cuts costs.

Intel has developed a transistor that is just 0.03 microns wide, allowing the chipmaker to build microprocessors that have more than 400 million transistors and run at 10 gigahertz.

These super-speedy transistors - which act like switches controlling the flow of electrons in a microchip - could complete 400 million calculations in the blink of an eye or finish 2 million calculations in the time it takes a bullet fired from a gun to travel one inch.

That type of speed and performance, Intel said, would make real the possibility of real-time voice translation, for example. The tiny, speedy transistor would also mean that a US$1,500 computer using a chip with the transistors would have as much power as some mainframe computers available now, costing millions of dollars.

Intel said it expects to have product available commercially by 2005 and that the chips will consume less than 1 watt of electricity.

"This demonstrates there's no fundamental barrier to scaling Moore's Law until the middle of the decade," said Rob Willoner, a market analyst in Intel's technology and manufacturing group.

Moore's Law, formulated by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore decades ago, stipulates that the number of transistors on a chip doubles every 18 months. More transistors in a microprocessor mean power and performance.

IBM said it introduced a manufacturing technology to build chips where the width of the lines used to etch circuits are 0.13 microns wide. A micron is the width of a human hair.

IBM said the new process will use copper wiring, as well as silicon-on-insulator and other technologies to manufacture the semiconductors. IBM said it expects to start using the new process technology in some of its products by the first quarter of 2001.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    I have no clue as to what you ...Anonymous -- 23/05/01

    I have no clue as to what you mean by the word "calculation" or how long it takes a bullet to travel one inch. Also a micron is much smaller than the width of ahuman hair. A hair is more like 100 microns.

    In the article @ http://www.zd ...Bruce Gold -- 17/10/01

    In the article @
    http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/news/story/0,2000025345,20107535-1,00.htm

    The (wisely anonymous) writer states:

    "Intel has developed a transistor that is just 0.03 microns wide, allowing the chipmaker to build microprocessors that have more than 400 million transistors and run at 10 gigahertz.

    These super-speedy transistors - which act like switches controlling the flow of electrons in a microchip - could complete 400 million calculations in the blink of an eye or finish 2 million calculations in the time it takes a bullet fired from a gun to travel one inch."

    I guess an eye blink might take about 1/20th of a second. So the 400 million instructions per blink is reasonable.

    The bullet claim is nonsense. A .22 flies at about 1000 feet/second or 12,000 inches/second. A .45 flies at about 750 feet/second or 9,000 inches per second. These are relatively slow bullets.
    A 7.65mm NATO bullet flies at about 2600 feet/second or 31,000 inches/second. A 5.56mm bullet flies at more than 3000 feet/second or 36,000 inches/second.

    Bullet | Operations/inch
    ------------------------
    .45 | 1.1 million
    .22 | 830 thousand
    7.65 | 320 thousand
    5.56 | 280 thousand

    Since there seems to be a problem with simple fractions, I have rounded my answers to make them easier to understand. Comparisons of processor speeds to more familiar events is a good idea, but so is getting the arithmetic right. Or perhaps the writer just confused Ralphie's Red Ryder BB gun with a firearm. "What do you want that for? You'll shoot your eye out!"

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured