Australian broadband raid violating privacy?

Excite@Home Australia users are up in arms over the telco's random raids on their broadband accounts in search of pirate activity, with many saying it's an invasion of their privacy.

The ISP informed users of its Optus@Home broadband service, ZDNet report, that it would terminate customer accounts found to be downloading pirate software or copyright material.

A message posted on a public newsgroup service from Cable & Wireless Optus, which half-owns Excite@Home, said its network security team would investigate claims into activities such as downloading protected movies and -immediately terminate" a subscriber's account without any prior warning.

A spokesperson from Excite@Home said -we are not watching every bit and byte, but we would randomly check from time to time."

Have you got a warrant?
The hard-hitting policy has raised many eyebrows, with some customers asking how extensive the monitoring on individual accounts is at present and what right does Optus have in controlling illegal activity on the Internet.

-What....right have Optus got to play policeman? They are a conduit-a provider, that's all," one ZDNet Australia reader said.

The users added that if an individual is breaking the law on the Internet, it should be treated in a similar way to somebody abusing the telephone system.

-The police should have to apply for a warrant and then present that to the telco to authorise monitoring for a specific person for a specific period," the reader said.

Excite@Home, however, said that users are made aware through the terms and conditions set out in its Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), that it would monitor the network from time to time.

-I wouldn't call it policing, we're just trying to comply with the law and by highlighting the issue to customers, its putting us in a better position as acting as a responsible Netizen on the Internet," the spokesperson said.

The Internet Industry Association's Peter Coroneos told ZDNet Australia he is "absolutely sure" that Optus or any other ISP do not want to police the Internet, "they just want to follow the law themselves", he said.

Bandwidth rations
Excite@Home users are claiming the company's hardline stance on illegal distribution and downloading of material is a way for it to ration its customer's broadband usage and reduce overall streaming on the service.

Dan Warne of broadband community site whirlpool.net.au said he wonders whether Optus, as one of Excite@Home's parent companies, may be trying to limit bandwidth usage by its users, as copyright material such as pirate software and movies often includes very large file downloads.

A spokesperson for the telco denied the allegation, saying users are enjoying high-speed Internet connection and that there is -hardly any complaints from customers" about bandwidth usage being an issue.

Advertisement

Talkback 18 comments

    This is no different to a Telc ...Anonymous -- 22/08/01

    This is no different to a Telco listening in on my phone calls - they have no right!
    This is so Orwellian, I can't believe it can be allowed. Last time I looked, Australia was a free country.

    As the previous reader points ...Anonymous -- 22/08/01

    As the previous reader points out this is Orwellian.

    If anybody is not farmiliar with the term, there is a book called "George Orwellian 1984".
    It is a very interesting story about the misuse of power.

    Another point:
    Who elected the broadband provider?
    Are they a company with the aim to maximise profits?
    If they can harrass you, who else can harrass you? Just anybody?
    If so, I want a copy of all your financial dealings, your CV and employer references, credit history.
    While we are at, why don't I just install a video audio survailance system in every room of your house including the bedroom and the bathroom.

    I am sure there must be some way to misuse the data to make money of it. Maybe it could just be sold or it might be use for blackmailing.

    Once again, who elected them?

    In your article you stated tha ...Optus@home User -- 23/08/01

    In your article you stated that Optus@home had informed its customers. Well I am a customer and I have heard nothing about this from Optus@home. I do not visit newsgroups either so if they think posting messages there will reach their customers they are mistaken. I think this move does invade my privacy.Broadband is only good for one thing, downloading movies,software,mp3's and the like, all illegal but only possible through broadband.

    I agree with the comments that ...Anonymous -- 23/08/01

    I agree with the comments that what Optus through Excite are doing is illegal. The process of monitoring actual data files is very different from monitoring network traffic. This breach in privacy needs to be treated as a serious infringment of human rights and investigated by the police. If found guilty those responsible should be punished through the full extent of the law. I also doubt the intentions of Excite are above board here with real aim being to reduce bandwidth usage.

    All this means that point to p ...Anonymous -- 23/08/01

    All this means that point to point encryption between file sharing clients will evolve. Users will still download information, and it will be impossible to actually determine whether or not someone is downloading copyrighted material.

    All that people like excite@home (or should that be bankrupt@home) will notice a high level of encrypted traffic, and make an educated guess that this traffic is probably due to the downloading of ISO, movie rips etc...

    What will they do then? Enforce a pathetic policy of "well, we thought you were engaged in something illegal"??

    Why does the burden of proof have to reside on the shoulders of the user? I though we lived in a society that allowed innocence until PROVEN guilty...

    Does this policy cater for users obtaining replacement data for damaged media? or video/audio?

    Regardless of all the rant, everyone really knows that this policy is in place to drop bandwidth usage, and not because excite@home cares a hoot about piracy. Surely if they had "evidence" that allowed them to terminate a users account, then they would also have a legal obligation to inform the authorities. And if that is the case, then the accused would need access to this "evidence" in order to defend themselves.

    Orwellian indeed When will peo ...Anonymous -- 23/08/01

    Orwellian indeed

    When will people realise there is no such thing as privacy. It is the inapropiate use of such "private information" that is the real problem.
    whether one believes it is to restict bandwith useage or to stop illegal down loads, doews it really matter. If the ISP ( as required by law) considers that inappropiate downlaoding occurs , by all means they have to right to question this.
    However a notice to the breacing subscriber my be appropiate, even with a financial fine.
    Or perhaps optus @home could consider a premium account with unlimited down loads for those few that down load in bulk.

    Hmmmm. If I compained to Optus ...Anonymous -- 23/08/01

    Hmmmm. If I compained to Optus that I didn't like them snooping my account & I don't give permission, face it, they'de terminate my account. The law doesn't count a thing in this country. Like America, we too can say, the law is bought with dollars.

    HA! "no complaints from u ...Anonymous -- 23/08/01

    HA! "no complaints from users" about bandwidth? That was not the allegation. The allegation was that the ISP was concerned about bandwidth usage. Anyone with any exposure to the business side of broadband knows well that costs rise in lockstep with usage. The best broadband customer (from the IPS' point of view) is one that signs up, pays on time and never uses the service.

    Private law enforcment malitia ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    Private law enforcment malitia

    Who appoint Optus@home the private law enforcement malitia?

    Their action have only one aim, reduce downloads in order to maximise return on investment.

    Optus' action has no other reason than to reduce the average daily download allowance, nothing to do with optus feeling more ethical.

    Putting themselves on a pedestal as been the White Knights recueing Australia does fool noone.
    The profiteering merchants have been recognised.

    BTW
    What is the only advantage broadband has over dial-up?

    Are companies now making their ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    Are companies now making their own laws?

    Who made them police?

    Robert: I must differ with you ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    Robert:

    I must differ with you. A broadband subscriber pays for speed 24/7 and should be able to utilise the connection 24/7. If not, then subscribe to metered dialup service.

    I don't know what levels of broadband are offered in Australia, but in the US, there is ADSL and SDSL, one being residential for the most part and the other is usually considered business class. ADSL is less expensive and the up/down speeds vary. SDSL is the same up and down.

    I pay for SDSL at my home and fully expect to be able to upload/download any size files I choose. In many cases it is upgrades to software that are really huge. A RH download of the complete distro is 700mb per disk and takes hours at 256k. Microsoft updates to IE and others are also very large. I remember one or two that were over 30 mb each and one that was 125 mb zipped.

    Is it your opinion that home users who download upgrades be charged a premium rate for service they already pay for?

    I don't happen to download movies, music or games, but that should not be a drawback in any case. That is what people obtain broadband for.

    In addition, many websites now use flash, and streaming video/audio which takes a great deal of bandwidth. If ISPs don't want to offer it, then let them stop. If they do offer it, they should not complain when it is used.

    Policing by monitoring data content is, in my opinion very Owellian, as was pointed out by several posters. It is wrong and should be illegal if it is not already.

    It's a bit like your telephone ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    It's a bit like your telephone company cutting you off for swearing on the phone. Whether what Optus are doing is illegal depends on what was in the subscribers initial agreement with the ISP but it could be illegal under both privacy and telecomunications legislation.

    Advertised as always on, but i ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    Advertised as always on, but if you use it they say the customers are abusing the system.

    Excuse ME!
    If they don't want people to use broadband why do they run advertising campaigns promoting broadband?

    They put download limits in place to prevent the paying subscribers form using it.

    They must make up their minds, do they want broadband customers or not.

    To me it looks like they don't want broadband customers.

    Most seem to miss the vital po ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    Most seem to miss the vital point here:
    ISPs are not "Carriers" and are not bound by any of the protections or obligations under the Telecommunications Act, even if the ISP service happens to be operated or sold by a company who is also a Carrier (Telco). ISPs are just commercial operations. As such, they can choose to (and are possibly wise to) verify the legality of any activity taking place on their infrastructure, just like you employer is entitled. The Act only protects information transferred over Carriage services. This means you cannot tap a carrier's link or exchange without a Court Order, but an ISP can examine traffic within its own infrastructure for legality, once it emerges from the Carriage Service (such as on their internal LAN segment).

    Isn't Optus Owned by Singtel, ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    Isn't Optus Owned by Singtel, which is run by that police state. etc

    Hey Baldrick, good point about ...Anonymous -- 24/08/01

    Hey Baldrick, good point about the Telecommunications Act 1997.. All the same, it's a pity that Optus seems to think it has an automatic right to violate their customers' privacy simply on the basis that some sort of "claim" is made. By whom? Anonymously?

    So, if Joe Nethead has annoyed me, can I just ring up the squeaky-clean netcop Optus & fake a report about him downloading "naughty stuff", knowing the said self-appointed corporate netcop will crawl all over his account & put him under a microscope? Who knows, it might even find something! I think it'd be safe to say the number of Optus@home users who have NOT downloaded at least ONE .mp3 file would be very small indeed. And of course, mp3s are mostly "naughty", aren't they?!

    Perhaps if we all used postcards instead of putting our letters into envelopes, the Post Office would also start to think they had some sort of automatic "right" to read everything that passed through their hands. I think that it's time that ISPs are taught that they need to respect people's privacy the way the Post Office respects the privacy of letters in envelopes.

    This means, fellow Netizens, we should help intrusive ISPs like Optus to learn they have NOT got unlimited access rights to our personal business, by all of us regularly using the equivalent of envelopes in the internet world: encryption, anonymous proxies, and the like. If then, like the Singapore Government has done, such technologies are considered and made illegal, we will have positive proof that we no longer live in a free society. We can then mentally adjust to being one step closer to being microchipped like housepets and enjoying a docile & controlled life under the benevolent and omniscient eyes of Big Corporate & Government Brothers.

    *rant ends*

    All we need is an entrepreneur ...Raph -- 29/10/01

    All we need is an entrepreneur to set up a competing service in Ausrtalia with a good privacy policy and it would be the perfect publicity for masses of disgruntled users to migrate overnight. Hmm... is there a Virgin Internet yet?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured