Uncrackable encryption: it's not sci-fi

COMMENTARY-- When I first heard about the encryption technique developed by Dr. Richard Hughes, it sounded like science fiction. After he explained it to me in detail, it still sounded like science fiction.

Imagine, if you will, a means of delivering encryption keys that is so secure that it's impossible to break because doing so would violate the laws of physics. In other words, the delivery method is so secure, it's protected by the very fabric of the universe.

If that doesn't get your attention, think about this: What Dr. Hughes is working with is a way to encode information on individual photons. He then sends these encoded photons to a receiver that can measure their characteristics and determine from those characteristics the data that the encoding represents. That's right. He's imprinting information on individual subatomic particles.

What makes this so secure is that the information can be encoded in several ways. If someone were to intercept these photons, only one of the possible encoding methods could be seen. If that method didn't contain the needed information, the eavesdropper couldn't then look at the information that was encoded differently. So why couldn't a hacker occasionally determine the encoding method by trial and error?

To do so would be pointless because hackers could never be sure they were seeing the real data, and it would violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle of quantum mechanics if the hacker tried to look at both types of polarization on the same particle. Add to these complications that the mere act of observing the photons in their path changes them and that the change is immediately detectable by the recipient.

Photon polarisation 101

Here's how all of this works: Dr. Hughes, who works in the Physics Division at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, creates photons using a very attenuated laser. He's able to choose the polarisation of each photon so that, for example, a vertical polarisation represents a 0 and horizontal polarisation a 1. Or, you can use opposite diagonal polarisations. The order of the polarisation is varied randomly, but the sender has already sent the sequence to the receiver. That way, the receiver doesn't have to look at a bunch of other photons in search of the information; it just looks for the information coming from the transmitter.

The beauty of the method is that even if some hackers knew the order as well, they couldn't gather the information without being detected. Why? Again, Heisenberg: You cannot observe a subatomic particle without changing it. When particles that have been observed arrive at the receiver, their bit error rate is very high, alerting the receiver that the data stream is being observed. As a result, the encoding sequence can be changed immediately, regaining the security of the transmission.

Nice theory, right? But using polarised photons for encryption is more than just a theory. In fact, it's already working in at least two test installations: one is run by BBN Networks and Harvard University, the other by the Army and Navy Research Laboratories near Washington, DC. Both installations transmit the photons over optical fiber. But transmitting photons over optical fiber is limited to about 70 km because using repeaters to strengthen the signal would introduce anomalies similar to those of an eavesdropper. Dr. Hughes thinks the delivery method needs to go beyond that.

"A much more compelling application is by transmitting through the atmosphere," Dr. Hughes explains, adding that he's been able to do single-photon communications through the air in daylight with an acceptable bit error rate. No need to lay all that fibre-optic cable anymore. "The trick," he says, "is to find the single photon against the background." It sounds like a feat requiring equipment only NASA could afford--in fact, transmitting encryption keys to satellites is being tested--but Dr. Hughes says he's mastered "free-space quantum cryptography" using commercial off-the-shelf components.

Even better, you can buy this now. A Swiss company named id Quantique is already selling a device that performs over fiber networks what it calls quantum key distribution. While the wireless optical version Dr. Hughes is testing isn't available now, he says that at least two companies are working on commercial versions. Once these products are available, you can be confident that your communications are secure. Unless someone starts messing around with the universe, anyway.

Will the laws of quantum physics end the theft of transmitted data once and for all? TalkBack below, or e-mail us your thoughts.

Talkback 8 comments

    Doesn't the poliarization patt ...Anonymous -- 24/04/02

    Doesn't the poliarization pattern (PP) have to be exchanged securily before the data is transmitted? Why not just exchange the data then? If the PP is a one time pad, it must be at least as long as the data in the first place. The main advantage of this system seems to be that the receiver knows that the message has been comprimised.

    To me this sounds like a great ...Martin -- 24/04/02

    To me this sounds like a great way to do key exchange as you will know if some-one has intercepted the data but you could not send sensitive data across as as mentioned someone else could read it. You will know this but if sensitive company data this is not acceptable. Where as if used as a key exchange you will know if intercepted and can re do the process. So this does not seem to be encryption rather authentication.

    This is not "Uncrackable ...Anonymous -- 24/04/02

    This is not "Uncrackable Encryption".

    If it works, then at best it is "Guaranteed Non-interception".

    Imagine I am a bad guy who has for the sake of the story has knocked out the good guy at the other end of the transmission, and now I am standing in his place. I will receive the transmission AS IT WAS SENT.

    i.e. If the message was sent in cleartext, I can guarantee it will be received in cleartext, and not have been intercepted.

    The "encryption" stuff has to occur before the "transmission" stuff.

    Using a method of induction, y ...Anonymous -- 24/04/02

    Using a method of induction, you could reproduce the information in a second photon beam by eliminating all the information that has no harmonic similarity to the original broadcast. But I could be wrong on that.

    To say that the signal can detect interception suggests that in the year 2010, the physics lab at Cornell will develop a system that is solar-flare proof, nuclear proof, resists physical trauma and is above and beyond all a method so reliable that its arrival at any destination alerts the system that the message has been intercepted.

    Ideally all such transmissions should be pointed up and away from any likely recipient.

    When we have encryption that is much like human DNA, then the likelyhood of finding a message is much like finding something useful ..... a task all of its own.

    Maybe I cracked the Uncrackabl ...Anonymous -- 25/04/02

    Maybe I cracked the Uncrackable encryption here, but couldn't a non-intended recipient (Hacker or what ever) receive the information, try all the possibility's to gain the information that it holds, then to avoid disturbing the information and being detected just re-send the information? Rather than looking and changing, grab distroy, send new ones in there place? With modern computers would you notice the milli-seconds this would add??

    You didn't properly explain ho ...Gregory Bradley -- 25/04/02

    You didn't properly explain how it works I think.
    I believe the photon can be in 4 states using 2 properties of the photon. The intended recieiver knows in advance what one of these states is supposed to be due to having the key. An eavedropper however does not. If he observes one of these properties, he cannot according to Heisenberg know the other, he can only guess and will be wrong half the time, so even if he sends on the photon, the stream is severely corrupted.

    It does work and it is uncrack ...Anonymous -- 18/05/02

    It does work and it is uncrackable. It is a normal One-Time-Pad encryption using a non-interceptable key exchange. The encrypted message is sent over clear space, and only the key need be transferred over single photon channels.

    Technically it's insecure thou ...larry (the) king -- 18/05/02

    Technically it's insecure though. People could still snoop entire photon transfers, at the severe risk of being caught. Your files will be a lot safer mainly because the risk of snooping them is a lot higher. right?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured