The critical flaws occur in the software giant's implementation of the Java Virtual Machine, which allows platform-independent programs to run on a PC.
"(The flaws) could enable an attacker to gain complete control over a user's system," stated the advisory. "This would enable the attacker to perform any operation that the user could, such as running applications; communicating with web sites; (and) adding, deleting or changing data."
An attacker could exploit the flaws by getting the victim to view a certain Web site with the code embedded in page. HTML e-mail could also be a danger, unless the recipient uses Outlook 2002, Outlook Express 6.0 or has installed the Outlook E-mail Security Update. Finally, those who used the Internet Explorer security settings to disable Java applets won't be affected by the vulnerabilities.
The first vulnerability is caused by a lack of vigilance of certain Java classes that handle database requests. While the classes do attempt to block illegal requests, the security measures can be bypassed, the advisory states.
A second flaw occurs in a Java class that's provided to support the use of XML via Java, but allows all programs--not just a select few--to use the methods.
Microsoft has a patch posted on its site and linked from the advisory. Windows users can also get the patch through Windows Update.
Why does the Dept of Fair Trading allow this to continue?
Why should software makers be the only ones not liable for mistakes, errors or flaws in their product?
When i buy a car, i do not have to agree to let one wheel randomly fall off and accept full responsibilty for shoddy workmanship.
Since MS has proven time and again that its products do not live up to their expectations, they should not be allowed to get away with their current EULA's.