Teenager admits writing Sasser worm

By Graeme Wearden, ZDNet UK
06 July 2005 08:07 AM
Tags: sven, worm, blaster, sasser, teenager, cluley, virus
A German teenager has pleaded guilty to creating the Sasser computer virus.

Sven Jaschen was just 17 when he released Sasser, in April 2004. The original worm and its variants infected countless thousands of Windows-based PCs worldwide -- in May 2004, it represented more than half of all worms detected.

Sasser also disrupted several important computer networks, including that of the UK's coastal service, which reportedly failed to patch against the virus.

Jaschen, who is also suspected of creating the Netsky virus, will be sentenced later this week.

Despite the damage caused by Jaschen's malware, Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, hopes that the teenager isn't sent to prison.

"I'm not sure what the point of jailing him would be," Cluley said, in an interview last week, adding that unlike today's serious cybercriminals Jaschen hadn't stolen credit cards or broken into a bank.

"They should give him community service and a big fine," Cluley added.

ZDNet UK's Graeme Wearden reported from London. For more coverage from ZDNet UK, click here.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    I am sorry but these hackers a ...Anonymous -- 06/07/05

    I am sorry but these hackers affect peoples lives and should be punished by long jail terms.

    A long jail sentence for a 17 ...Anonymous -- 06/07/05

    A long jail sentence for a 17 year old who wrote a worm? Anomymous you are a git. If a 17 yr old can create such a disruptive worm, then that tells me that computers these days have the security of a slice of swiss cheese. Fair enough, he must be pretty smart, but im sure there are people out there who are also smart, and older. Personally i say good on him. He showed how insecure most systems are! As for these wingers who request lengthy jail sentences for youths with mis directed talents, secure your computers better, and if you want to complain, complain to those security chatrlatens.

    Interesting analogy, if you le ...Anonymous -- 07/07/05

    Interesting analogy, if you leave your car or house unlocked you deserve to have all the assets stripped. I don't think so, purposful theft or malicious damage (The author knew what he was doing)should be a punishable offense in the same way a person who steals from my house

    A more accurate analogy is tha ...Anonymous -- 07/07/05

    A more accurate analogy is that you secure your house against all known threats, but some smart thief discovers a new way of breaking in and stealing your assets. Are you still to blame because you didn't foresee this? According to some people it would seem that you are!

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured