Studios win Sydney piracy victory

By Renai LeMay, ZDNet.com.au
25 May 2009 04:58 PM
Tags: afact, burnt, court, mipi, movies, music, piracy, sydney

The local arms of film and music studios have claimed a victory in their war against copyright offences, with a Sydney man convicted for selling pirated content last week.

Yong Hong Lin, the owner of an Eastwood, Sydney music and movie store was found guilty of 15 copyright offences in Sydney's District Court on 21 May, the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) and Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) wrote in a statement distributed today. Lin will be sentenced on 21 August.

However, Lin's jury acquitted him of 16 of the 31 offences he was initially charged with.

Police had raided Lin's facility on 27 February 2007, finding more than 16,000 pirated music and movie discs being offered for sale, alleged AFACT and MIPI. Some of the discs were allegedly imported from China, and some burnt locally.

AFACT and MIPI said the charges were the "first copyright matters to proceed on indictment and be heard before a jury" in Australia. "Mr Lin has been judged by 12 of his fellow Australians and they have found his conduct to be criminal; now he must accept the consequences," said MIPI investigations manager Dean Mitchell.

AFACT director of operations Neil Gane said pirates should be in "no doubt" that what he called their criminal actions would be thoroughly investigated, shut down by police, and judged in court.

The copyright duo said criminal penalties for copyright infringement were up to $60,500 and five years imprisonment per offence for individuals, and up to $302,500 for corporations.

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    Why stop there? Dean -- 25/05/09

    They should also go after his real estate agent for selling/leasing him the premises where he was selling the DVDs. Or maybe they should go after Casio who sold him the cash register he used to take people's money. Or maybe they can go after TDK who made the blank DVDs he burnt the DVDs to.

    I guess going after people's ISPs will just have to do...

    not enough Anonymous -- 25/05/09 (in reply to #320138002)

    maybe they should let a few thousand pedos out of max security jail and put pirates in their instead...

    oh god all of those pirated tvb dramas are polluting are streets, NOOOOOO!!

    @Why stop there? Terry -- 25/05/09 (in reply to #320138002)

    This has no relation as all to the iiNet case, this is pure and simply someone taking copyrighted materials and selling it for profit. People were convicted of this 10 years ago, and they'll still be convicted of it 10 years from now.

    This person sort to make individual profit from the sale of these copyrighted materials, that is where they crossed the line.

    @@Why stop there? Blackbeard -- 26/05/09 (in reply to #320138029)

    On the contrary, in the eyes of the pigopolists, this is exactly the same as suing iiNet. They are convinced that the only reason for fast broadband is for people to 'pirate' their goods, so the ISPs, by providing it, must be profiting solely from copyright infringement.

    @@Why stop there? Sam Therapy -- 26/05/09 (in reply to #320138245)

    ISPs should be held accountable for illegal downloads. The CAN monitor file sharing and block it if they werent making so much money off of it.

    @@Why stop there? IT Pro -- 26/05/09 (in reply to #320138296)

    Sam, if you believe that ISPs can perform deep packet inspection on every piece of information that goes through their servers, and correctly identify EVERY copyrighted item in existence, then I've got a great bridge in Sydney you might like to buy...

    Wake up guys Anonymous -- 26/05/09

    Wake up guys. What he was doing was illegal - nothing more, nothing less. He was copying and selling copyright material for personal financial gain. No amount of excuses can escape that simple fact.

    so what Anonymous -- 29/05/09 (in reply to #320138272)

    Yes, what he was convicted of was illegal, always has been, always should be. That has nothing to do with the operation of ISPs who merely provide a communication pipeline.

    Sam Therapy would like us to think that it is illegal to share files, and therefore the ISPs should block all file sharing. Rubbish. He sounds suspiciously like an overpaid lawyer for the large content corporations.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured