Spam-stuffed systems an unwelcome gift

Spam will overhaul legitimate e-mail by July 2003, according to e-mail managed service provider MessageLabs, a situation highlighted when many workers returned to their computers post-Christmas to e-mail accounts stuffed with spam.

The date was determined by statisticians employed by MessageLabs, who extrapolated the current growth of spam and comparing it to the growth of e-mail, which they expect to have doubled by 2007. The research focusses on work e-mail addresses rather than consumer-addresses.

During 2002 one in 12 e-mails passing through MessageLabs' spam and virus filter system was identified as spam. However, during November this surged to one in three e-mails.

"If you don't do anything about it e-mail becomes useless, because everyone gets peeved with it," Paul MacRae, director of MessageLabs told ZDNet Australia  .

Many e-mail providers are now looking to combat spam, with one example being Hotmail, which employing the services of anti-spam company Brightmail to reduce the level of spam received by its users.

MacRae believes action needs to be taken, and filtering companies are only part of the solution. "Technology is one way in a gambit of policies, it's not the be-all and end-all," he said. "There needs to be some powerful legislation. There's been a lot of talk, but [spam-prevention] is going down the path of self regulation, which is not necessarily a good thing."

MacRae cites a US legal case in which spammers had been arrested and given jail time because they had not delivered the promised product, falling foul of the US equivalent of the Trade Practices Act. The spammers had received around 24,000 payments after sending out 50 million e-mails, netting just under half a million dollars. MacRae points out if the spammers had sent the information they promised, they would have got away scott-free.

"If it's affordable, and you get those results, and there's no barrier to entry to do it, why would you not keep doing it?" he asked. He described one prospective solution to the spam problem - by charging people to send e-mails - as a "scary concept".

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

  1. The Australian government has made spam illegal it's considered an invasion of privacy Privacy Act but since 80% of most spam comes from the US where it's protected by freedom of speech laws the Australian laws are going to have little impact on the spam. Anonymous -- 30/12/02

    The Australian government has made spam illegal it's considered an invasion of privacy Privacy Act but since 80% of most spam comes from the US where it's protected by freedom of speech laws the Australian laws are going to have little impact on the spam.

    While I have a hotmail account and are happy to see how email providers like Hotmail are implementing methods to stop spam I unfortunately still receive it and now it's mostly porn. I have resorted to filters that look for specific words in the subject in order to stop the spam.

    But as I have found from good hard experience these spammers are becoming more and more clever at beating these anti-spam software tools and even filters that look for specific words in the subject line.

  2. Companies should really use reverse DNS lookups to verify the sending SMTP server, HOWEVER, many small companies and busineses use email services (SMTP) piggy-backed from their ISP but have their own mail server (or some sort of alias) - the problem is th Anonymous -- 02/01/03

    Companies should really use reverse DNS lookups to verify the sending SMTP server, HOWEVER, many small companies and busineses use email services (SMTP) piggy-backed from their ISP but have their own mail server (or some sort of alias) - the problem is that their domain name will have to be registered.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Alex Serpo Is green IT a marketing fad?
    It seems that green IT has dropped off the radar, with other technology issues moving to the fore. But was green IT ever a real technology movement, or was it just a marketing fad?
  • Array Gutless studios have the wrong target
    I have one word for the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT). Gutless.
  • Array NBN needs workers on board
    Without consensus on labour issues, the eventual winner of the NBN may end up as little more than a lame duck and a cashed-up symbol of the conflict between the desire for progress and the lack of mechanisms to deliver it.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured