Second zero-day flaw found in Word

A second security vulnerability has been discovered in Microsoft Word in less than a week.

The zero-day flaw, which is could let an attacker gain remote access to a person's system, affects Word 2000, Word 2002, Word 2003 and Word Viewer 2003, according to a Microsoft security advisory posted on Sunday night. Word 2007 is not affected, Microsoft said.

"From the initial reports and investigation, we can confirm that the vulnerability is being exploited on a very, very limited and targeted basis," Microsoft stated in its advisory.

Nonetheless, security provider Secunia said on Monday in the US that it is rating this latest Word security flaw as "extremely critical" because it is unpatched and because malicious attackers are currently exploiting the vulnerability.

In this case, attackers are taking advantage of a flaw that arises when an unspecified error occurs when processing a Word document, Secunia said in its advisory.

Microsoft noted that the vulnerability is different from the security flaw discovered in Word last week, which also is a zero-day problem. In order to activate that flaw, a person would need to open a malicious Word file that was hosted on a Web site or an attachment that arrives via e-mail.

The software giant is not expected to have patches available for the flaws when it issues its monthly round of security updates on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    Get terminology right please Anonymous -- 12/12/06

    n-day exploits (as opposed to flaws) refer to the number of days since the vulnerability has been in circulation, and is an indication to crackers of the likelihood of the exploit being successful. If the exploit has been around for five days, it will be a five-day exploit.

    Therefore it is incorrect to either of these flaws as a ‘zero-day flaw’, as exploits against these flaws have been in the wild for more than zero days.

    It is somewhat disappointing that a technical journal such as ZDNet gets something as simple as this wrong.

    Terminology Anonymous -- 12/12/06 (in reply to #320072151)

    There seems to be, at least, two definitions of '0-day exploit/flaw'

    One is how many days there were between the vulnerability's discovery, and the appearance of something that exploited it. Thus, a 0-day exploit is released "into the wild" on the same day as the weakness it uses was found. The lack of a patch plays no part in the definition.

    The other definition seems to be "attacks on publicly known but unpatched vulnerabilities". This definition being much more general, nothing to do with time periods, and seeming to have nothing to do with the actual term 'zero day' itself. This also seems to be the definition that a lot of the media is using.

    Compare with the term "0-day warez" which is illegal copies of software released on/before the official release date of the software.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_day
    http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14_gci955554,00.html
    http://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22zero+day+exploit%22+definition

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett Get extensions going in Firefox, redux
    Previously on Null Pointer we looked at getting extensions working in Firefox betas, and that was great until the fine folks at Firefox changed their minds.
  • Array How reliable is IP telephony?
    Have you ever heard a weird kind of hissing, crackling or popping noise when calling someone on an IP telephony line? How rare is the phenomenon these days?
  • Array Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured