Russia and China 'behind current spam deluge'

As hardcore criminals step up their spamming, experts believe that nine out of 10 of all e-mails may soon be unsolicited junk.

Organised criminals based in Russia are fuelling the rise in the amount of spam sent over the Internet, according to a leading opponent of junk mail.

Steve Linford, director of The Spamhaus Project, warned on Tuesday that these gangs are supplying US-based spammers with details of compromised PCs that can be used to send out their unsolicited commercial messages, and creating viruses that will create more of these open proxies.

"There is a new level of criminality in the spamming world," Linford told the Openwave Messaging Anti-Abuse conference in London. "Russian gangs are creating viruses and proxies and selling them onto US spammers."

According to Linford, these Russian gangs aren't constrained by any anti-spam or cybercrime laws in their home country and have no respect for legislation implemented in other countries.

Linford also told the conference that some 70 percent of spam is sent from China by American spam outfits who are hosting their servers with Chinese ISPs. In many cases the spammers have set up firewalls so that the ISPs can't actually see what's being hosted.

"We keep battling with Chinese ISPs who don't understand what we are complaining about," said Linford, whose organisation run a number of blacklists in an attempt to prevent spammers sending their wares out onto the Web.

Estimates vary for the extent of the spam problem, with MessageLabs reporting on Tuesday that 76 percent of the emails it scanned in May were spam -- a greater percentage than ever before.

Linford, who was scathing about the anti-spam laws that have been brought in by the British and American governments, believes that this trend will probably continue.

"While the UK and US put the concerns of the direct marketing industry ahead of the interests of citizens, this problem will continue to get worse. Unless things change drastically, we predict that 80 percent of email will be spam by December this year, and it's very likely to go to 90 percent by this summer," Linford warned.

ZDNet UK's Graeme Wearden reported from London. For more coverage from ZDNet UK, click here.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

    9 out of 10 unsolicitated emails (spam) would go away if any of the email programs (Mozilla / Eurdora / Outlook) would add a facility to only allow emails that are from people in your address book. Why isn't this facility available? Who cares if the sendeAnonymous -- 09/06/04

    9 out of 10 unsolicitated emails (spam) would go away if any of the email programs (Mozilla / Eurdora / Outlook) would add a facility to only allow emails that are from people in your address book. Why isn't this facility available? Who cares if the sender has to ring you up and ask to be added to an address book. I'd love to have this feature!

    Sure, all of the spoofed spam emails will get through, but for me these are usually less than 5% of all my spam email that I receive. At least this way it will get rid of all of the spam containing OEM software specials, viagra and ways to increase your body parts.

    comments...?

    I'm not sure rejecting e-mail that is not "from:" someone in your address book will be as effective as you think. It certainly won't stop the proliferation of viruses, since most often they appear to be from someone in your address book already Anonymous -- 10/06/04

    I'm not sure rejecting e-mail that is not "from:" someone in your address book will be as effective as you think. It certainly won't stop the proliferation of viruses, since most often they appear to be from someone in your address book already (albeit spoofed). It also does not address the issue from the standpoint of ISPs, who must deal with the bandwidth and storage.

    Having said that, my mail client (Thunderbird), does in fact have the ability to do just as you suggest. "Tools" -> "Message Filters". Create a filter rule to match "Sender...isn't in my address book". Then click "Delete the message". I'm quite sure Outlook can be set up this way as well, although the nomanclature and syntax are probably different.

    Even with such an ability, I would not want to do this on either a personal or business account. I think the eventual daily effort level would be on par with hitting "delete" a few hundred times, which is my effort level now.

    I think the most promising effort right now lies in authentication. Keep mailboxes open, but verify that the message is coming from who it says it is. Blacklists then become considerably more effective, since spoofing and relay rape will no longer work. SPF and Domain Keys are looking very promising, and SPF in particular has been adopted by many ISPs already. My server logs hundreds of messages a day that are blocked by not matching the SPF data, and I am sure other system have been blocking spoofed mail that appears to come from any of the domains I manage.

    This a political problem, not a technology problem. Almost all the unsolicited commercial email I receive is fraud under current law. When the spammers start going to jail this will diminish to manageable proportions. Alice Marshall http://technAnonymous -- 11/06/04

    This a political problem, not a technology problem. Almost all the unsolicited commercial email I receive is fraud under current law. When the spammers start going to jail this will diminish to manageable proportions.
    Alice Marshall
    http://technoflak.blogspot.com/

    Outlook already has that option. In fact I NEVER get junk in Inbox on Outlook 2003, HOWEVER i do get real mail in my Junk Mail folder. To me it's really simple. Authentication. ITS NOT THAT HARD!Anonymous -- 11/06/04

    Outlook already has that option. In fact I NEVER get junk in Inbox on Outlook 2003, HOWEVER i do get real mail in my Junk Mail folder.

    To me it's really simple. Authentication. ITS NOT THAT HARD!

    Russia and China 'behind current spam deluge'Anonymous -- 28/02/08

    1/ Outlook has an option to treat as spam messages originating from certain countries (top domain list) and also in certain alphabets (blocked encodings list). Sounds like a fine idea but in practice it seems innefective. I still get emails in Russian - with Cyrillic encoding - even though I only have US ASCII and Western European encodings allowed and countries like China and Russia are excluded. Is this a bug in Outlook 2007?

    2/ Also, if an ISP receives a very high number of emails with the same content from a foreign country, how hard would it be for them to flag it as spam or simply reject it? I don't think we need new laws, rather some pressure put on ISPs to seriously tackle this issue.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • David Braue Will Rudd's bush backhaul bonanza deliver?
    Rural areas will be welcoming the government's decision to put its money where its politicising is, funnelling $250m into a regional fibre upgrade to six rural centres. Remedying over a decade of near-neglect at the hands of telecoms privatisation, the investment could be the firmest step yet for Labor's NBN dream — but with inevitable political questions and a looming election, Rudd and Conroy need to deliver, and quickly, to preserve the NBN's credibility.
  • Array Doing for AV what VoIP did for telephony
    Sydney-based start-up Audinate is making traditional analog cabling obsolete in favour of TCP/IP-based networking technology. And it's doing a pretty good job so far, with its technology used by World Youth Day and the Sydney Opera House.
  • Array WiMax in Australia: Part two
    WiMax could be the standard that drives the next phase of mobile broadband, it provides an opportunity for players wanting to establish a pure IP network to carry voice and data effectively — but is this what operators want?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured