No fix for 'critical' hole in Windows 98, ME

Microsoft will not fix a serious flaw in Windows 98 and Windows Millennium Edition because a patch could break other applications.

The security bug relates to Windows Explorer and could let an intruder commandeer a vulnerable PC, Microsoft warned in April. The software maker has made fixes available for Windows Server 2003, Windows XP and Windows 2000, but it has found that eliminating the vulnerability in Windows 98 and ME is "not feasible," it said.

"To do so would require re-engineering a significant amount of a critical core component of the operating system," Microsoft said in a Friday update to its MS06-015 security bulletin. "After such a re-engineering effort, there would be no assurance that applications designed to run on these platforms would continue to operate."

Instead, Microsoft recommends that people who still use the older operating systems protect their PCs by using a network firewall that filters traffic on TCP Port 139. "Such a firewall will block attacks attempting to exploit this vulnerability from outside of the firewall," it said.

The software maker even had trouble with its fix for Windows XP. It had to revise the update and release it a second time because the patch caused problems for people who used Hewlett-Packard Share-to-Web software or older Nvidia graphics drivers.

Microsoft is phasing out support for the older operating systems. Windows 98 was released in June 1998, Second Edition followed a year later, and Millennium Edition came out in 2000. Microsoft has been providing fixes for only "critical" flaws the past couple of years and is ending support altogether next month, after its planned July 11 patch release. Windows XP with Service Pack 1 reaches its end of support on Oct. 10, 2006.

Not providing fixes leaves users vulnerable, but software can't be supported forever, said Michael Sutton, a director at security intelligence company iDefense, a part of VeriSign. "At some point, any vendor has to make a business decision to cease product support, and these products are now 7 to 8 years old," he said.

The older Windows versions have never been secure, said Russ Cooper, a senior scientist at Cybertrust, a security vendor in Herndon, Va. "The lack of a 'critical' patch does not weaken these OSes. Instead, it should merely put an end to their perception that they were secure before this fault came to light," he said.

And as far as blocking traffic on port 139 goes, it is a network port that has been abused in the past for attacks, said Don Leatham, director of solutions and strategy at PatchLink. "Most organisations will already have port 139 blocked," he said. "Although it is good that Microsoft is reiterating this, I don't see it being a huge impact."

The best way to secure PCs that run older versions of Windows is upgrading the operating system, Microsoft suggested.

"With the upcoming end (of) support for these products, we strongly recommend that those of you who are still running these older versions of Windows upgrade to a newer, more secure version, such as Windows XP SP2, as soon as possible," Christopher Budd, a staffer in Microsoft's' security response center, wrote on the team's blog.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    Fair enough too Mike -- 13/06/06 (in reply to #120135928)

    I agree with Microsofts decision here. It's time you upgrade if you are still using this old software. Microsfot have to make money somehow and making older software defunct is one way of doing it.

    Let's not be panicked Anonymous -- 14/06/06

    If you're behind a firewall, corporate or otherwise, that secures port 139 on an up-to-date Win98SE system, then you probably have a solid system -- and let's not forget that it's intrinsically safer than more recent OSs because it does not support alternate data streams. If you're happy with the way all your apps are running (for now, cos of course nothing lasts forever), then upgrade as it suits you rather than Microsoft.

    Let's not be panicked Anonymous -- 14/06/06

    If you're behind a firewall, corporate or otherwise, that secures port 139 on an up-to-date Win98SE system, then you probably have a solid system -- and let's not forget that it's intrinsically safer than more recent OSs because it does not support alternate data streams. If you're happy with the way all your apps are running (for now, cos of course nothing lasts forever), then upgrade as it suits you rather than Microsoft.

    I've said this before.. Anonymous -- 14/06/06

    I've been working on computers and networks for the past 15+ years. I've installed and troubleshooted “every” Windows Operating System that the company ever made, including 2003 server.
    The first thing that I get tired of, is all of the same people, that say the same things.. over.. and over.. again. The truth is that Microsoft does not, support there “end users” ! Nope.. sorry.. not like the “old days” with free upgrades ECT. Any old time user will tell you all this. Does NOT MATTER how old a O.S. is, you as a company “have to” support it. This also includes the current topic here about bots and "security". Look at Windows98SE and Windows ME, Microsoft's not fixing critical flaws on both of those O.S... Why? Mmmm.. maybe cause “VISTA” is right around the corner? Hmm.. maybe 'cause Microsoft is goning to "make you" "upgrade" to a "VISTA". Sounds great.. but not on older computer.. so RUN out and buy a new computer too! LOL! Windows 98SE still works fine on many systems out there, so don't give me any other analogies. The second thing is that YOU, should not have to buy a new O.S. every year or so. Wake up people, because like “Windows 2003 server”.. Microsoft is trying to “charge” people for a future upgrades! All you “pro-Microsoft-can-do-anything-they-want” type of people, enjoy! when this also comes to be the common standard in the future, from your oh-so-loved-company. The only people who make “pro” Microsoft comments on this site are ether people getting paid by Microsoft, or people who really don't know what they are talking about in the first place. I have been switching all my computers to Ubuntu Linux, and anyone worth their salt in computers, will tell you that Linux, Unix or OSX (APPLE) is the only way to go for the future.
    (Old Tech) sys6656

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured