Ignore new surveillance law: Ruddock

By AAP
31 March 2006 09:41 AM
Tags: e-mail, ruddock, attorney-general, tapping, surveillance

Our content licensing agreement with AAP stipulates that the material must be taken down 30 days from the date of publication. Therefore this particular story, having exceeded that time frame, has expired. We apologise for any inconvenience.

AAP

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    Ignore? Yeh sure! Anonymous -- 31/03/06 (in reply to #120131895)

    We already know how corrupt and incompetent the police and security services are.
    What stops these people from using the information they gather to their own personal advantage?
    For example, insider trading, extortion, publication, etc.
    Who watches the watchers? AKA Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Oh Phillip! Rex Alfie Lee -- 01/04/06

    What a contemptuous clot you are!

    Have a stroke & one for Li'l Johnnie Hoo-Haw & Wheasley B whilst I'm on a roll.

    Stroke on guys; & soon, please!

    Regards,
    Lib & Lab lover xoxox

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured