Webcertificate.com customers reported getting an e-mail message that included their home and e-mail addresses.
"I hate to inform you that your account has been hacked," said the e-mail, viewed by CNET News.com, from someone identified as Zilterio
Webcertificate, a unit of electronic-payment company Ecount, was hacked August 21, a representative said. Shortly afterward, the hacker, who also claimed to have stolen credit card numbers of 350,000 of the company's customers, contacted Philadelphia-based Ecount and tried to extort the company, said Matt Gillin, Ecount's chief executive. The caller demanded US$45,000 in exchange for not disclosing the information.
The company refused to meet the demands, Gillin said.
After notifying the FBI, Ecount informed customers August 28 that the break-in had occurred, and it assured them that their credit card information was safe. Because the company stores credit card information offline, it would be impossible for the hacker to steal it electronically.
What the hacker thought were credit card numbers were really 16-digit serial numbers used to identify gift certificates. Ecount has canceled those codes. "There is no financial liability to the company or our customers," Gillin said.
The FBI could not be reached for comment.
Hackers continue to plague the Internet even as technology companies have poured millions of dollars into developing security technology. But the costs of fortifying a Web site with the latest security technology can be enormous, and often hackers prove to be more than a match for the electronic barricades.
Companies such as Amazon.com-owned book service Bibliofind.com, Creditcards.com and Egghead.com, which recently filed for bankruptcy protection, have seen their sites broken into and customer information--in some cases, credit card information--swiped by thieves.
Executives of Ecount said they anticipated the hacker would e-mail customers whose information was stolen. Last week, the company tried to pre-empt the hacker when it warned customers to expect a message from the hacker and informed them why the company would not agree to the hacker's demands.
In the e-mail to Webcertificate customers from Zilterio, the author declares that the security breach was a result of "weak security," an apparent attempt to embarrass the company.
Ecount said the attempt to undermine the company's relationship with its customers failed; most customers support the company in its fighting against Internet thieves. But some damage may have been done. One customer told News.com that she would no longer use Webcertificate.
"This disturbs me, that this guy has all of my personal information," said Nancy Parker, a frequent Webcertificate customer over the past two years who was shocked to see her personal information in the e-mail. "What's from keeping it from happening again?"
Gillin said that immediately after the attacks, the company began bolstering the site's security.
"We're doing all we can to make sure that this never happens again," he said.
STOP misusing the word "Hacker"!
A hacker is a computer enthusiast who subscribes in some degree to the hacker ethic (see The New Hacker's Dictoinary, ISBN 0-262-68092-0) that sharing can be a powerful positive good. Hackers are often co-operative, polite people (providing you are polite to them too, of course!) and in general are motivated by the quest for knowledge, not lust for money.
The jerks described in the article could better be described as 'crackers' or, more accurately: criminals, extortionists, blackmailers. They were not harmlessly seeking knowledge, but instead appear to have shamefully misused their abilities by victimising a company for their own selfish personal financial gain.
The media should take professional pride in accurate reporting, and this includes getting terminology precisely correct. I'm sure ZDnet doesn't want to convey the impression they are sloppy or slapdash... hmmm?