Gartner: Expect a Windows AV and anti-spyware in 2005

Analyst firm Gartner expects Microsoft to launch a Windows anti-virus and anti-spyware product in the second half of 2005, following the software giant's acquisition of Giant on Thursday.

In an effort to improve the disastrous security record of Internet Explorer (IE) and fight off the threat from the Firefox browser, Gartner believes there is an 80 percent chance that Microsoft will release a combined anti-virus and anti-spyware product in the second half of 2005.

In a research note published on Thursday, Gartner analysts predicted that such a product from Microsoft would cost less than current anti-virus and anti-spyware products on the market, which is likely to affect the development cycles of traditional anti-virus firms such as Symantec.

"To remain competitive, antivirus vendors must either accelerate their lagging spyware product development cycles or acquire one of the remaining smaller anti-spyware vendors," said Gartner analysts.

Speculation about Microsoft releasing an antivirus product has been growing since the company bought Romania-based antivirus firm GeCad in June 2003.

Earlier this year, Microsoft's chairman Bill Gates hinted that the company was looking at offering an anti-spyware product but did not disclose whether the product would be developed internally or part of an acquisition strategy.

At the time, Gates said: "This malware thing is so bad. Now that's the one that has us really needing to jump in."

Giant, the anti-spyware firm acquired by Microsoft, only targets the consumer market, which means enterprises are unlikely to be the main beneficiaries of any new offering.

Talkback 4 comments

    If Microsoft has any cl****, t ...Anonymous -- 17/12/04

    If Microsoft has any cl****, they'd build a desktop-only version of this into Windows for free. Yes it would leverage their monopoly and irritate the crap out of their competitors. But an "Outlook Express strength" security tool would go a long way towards making the net a safer place.

    In any case, it is obscene that the computing public has to pay $200 for AV and anti-spyware to make their PCs viable. It's a hidden cost too seldom discussed.

    Are you certain that MS just w ...Anonymous -- 17/12/04

    Are you certain that MS just won't bury the technology?

    Still, the best way to avoid Windows viruses and spyware is to use something else, like a Mac :-)

    Rule 1: There will always be v ...Anonymous -- 18/12/04

    Rule 1:

    There will always be viruses, trojans, and spyware.

    Rule 2:

    These malware need to have a significant platform to launch themselves. They need a critical m**** before they can really spread.

    Frankly, Microsoft deserves all the bad publicity about security that they have got. They did not take it seriously until about a year ago, and now they are playing catch up.

    SP2 went a long way towards fixing the problem. Firstly, if the windows firewall was on from Day 1, blaster and several others would not have spread. There is still one major design weakness in the Windows firewall, and that is that it does nothing about outgoing traffic.

    The most important thing about security though is your default settings. This is one area where linux and OS-X does really well in comparison. It is the computer illiterate users that need the protection (from themselves). It is not their fault that they don't perceive risk levels in what they are doing. Why is active scripting enabled? Why does Windows start up all theses services that are not normally used? The basic answer is that when the decision was made to include these features, they didn't stop and ask themselves how they might be exploited.

    Technically illiterate users will leave whatever AV software comes with their motherboard. They will punch in their credit card to renew their subscription after 3 months, but not install it properly. They will never click the critical updates icon in the system tray to install them. I have seen it so many times.

    I hear a lot of go get a Mac type comments to these questions. My PC is over 2 years old now running Windows XP. It has an always on internet connection but it has never had a virus. Why? Because I have it set up properly. It is time MS shipped it in that sort of state rather than presuming users will switch off what they don't use. One page I believe Windows could take out of the *nux book (sorry Mac, you inherited it from a well thought out OS) is to force you to make a file executable. A simple right click -> Allow this file to be Executed option is sufficient. All incoming emails should be made non-executable and a lot of problems would be no more.

    My 2c.

    Adam

    You are incorrect. You can g ...Anonymous -- 20/12/04

    You are incorrect. You can get decent free protection from Avg and Avast. Avast even allows
    non-for-profit to use their program at no charge. Also, you can get programs like spybot search and destroy Free.

    "In any case, it is obscene that the computing public has to pay $200 for AV and anti-spyware to make their PCs viable. It's a hidden cost too seldom discussed."

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured