Bill Cheswick: Silly passwords, soft perimeters and Vista

Strong passwords do not necessarily provide better security so why do we persist creating ones that are hard to guess — and hard to remember — when a computer can crack them in seconds, asks Bill Cheswick, distributing computing and communications researcher for AT&T Labs.

In order to watch video content you need to enable javascript and install Flash player version 8 or above.

"It is simply poor engineering to expect people to create and remember passwords that computers cannot guess and in a reasonable amount of time," Cheswick told ZDNet.com.au.

"My biggest complaint is that we're insisting on very strong passwords, but we're not getting strong security for those passwords."

A job description for Cheswick has included "being famous", which he achieved at AusCERT 2008, for pointing out a few truths and making delegates laugh. He's interested in security that's too hard to ensure, passwords that are too hard to remember, graphs that are too hard to visualise, and VCRs that are too hard to program. He's even had a crack at mapping the Internet, which he did at Bell Labs in 1998.

Cheswick took a moment to chat with ZDNet.com.au to talk about:

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    Using Strong Passwords Rex Alfie Lee -- 16/06/08

    "Strong passwords do not ....... — when a computer can crack them in seconds, asks Bill Cheswick". Yeah right Bill!

    I'd like to see a computer that can break a password that has 3 words of 4 or more characters in it each. I want to see the computer that can do that. Bill, you obviously don't know what you're talking about. I evaluated how long it'd take to crack my passwords & I believe with current technology it'd be about 20 thousand years with all the computing power currently available.

    If you want to check that out consider 12 alphabetic characters of any value, several words, upper & lowercase values, numbers & it all makes sense to me. There are 390877006486250192896 possibilities to guess the right number to access my bank account. That's over three hundred and ninety quintillion apparently. I'm pretty sure my bank stops after 3 attempts so I figure I'm pretty safe for a while.

    Without key-stroke software embedded on my computer it'll be a little difficult. Good luck!

    agreed with above James Davis -- 16/06/08

    this is just another media w h o r e attempt..

    Bill, a little more! Rex Alfie Lee -- 16/06/08

    My emails password has 24 characters including spaces & other grammatical characters which makes it 68 to the power of 19. It's a truly big number, something like 65715730729138450753894037357330000.
    Six hundred & fifty seven septillion is 7 digits short of the possibilities for this one. It make you a little longer to get that one Bill.

    Numbers, I forgot the numbers! Rex Alfie Lee -- 16/06/08

    3226266762397899821056 possibilities for my bank account and 2571997040768514410128631917321300000000000000
    for the emails. Sorry I gave you a mislead there. I'm sure you hadn't had time to work it out yet though.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured