Australian ISPs to step up spam fight

A new code requiring Internet and e-mail service providers to undertake a range of spam-fighting measures will come into force in July.

The code of practice -- registered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority after being developed by the Internet Industry Association (IIA) and state industry bodies -- is designed to supplement Australia's anti-spam legislation, itself the subject of a review by the Minister for Communications and Information Technology, Senator Helen Coonan.

The code is set to apply to the 689 active ISPs in Australia from 16 July.

Chris Chapman, the chairman of the ACMA, described the document as "the first legislative code of practice for Internet and e-mail service providers in the world".

E-mail service providers include multinational heavyweights like Yahoo and Microsoft, whose free offerings are Yahoo Mail and Hotmail respectively.

Under the code, Internet Industry Spam Code Of Practice, Internet and e-mail service providers must offer spam filtering options and advice to subscribers. They also must have a complaints handling process for spam.

The code also lays down a range of technical obligations such as prevention of automated registration of e-mail accounts, retain the right within Acceptable Use Policies to scan their own networks for subscribers' misconfigured mail and proxy servers and impose "reasonable limits" on the rate at which subscribers can send e-mail.

Senator Coonan is presently reviewing the Spam Act 2003 to see if it requires improvement. The ACMA has strongly backed the existing legislation, saying there "does not appear" to be any grounds for significant amendment. The regulator has pointed out the proportion of global spam coming out of Australia has fallen to below one percent.

Advertisement

Talkback 1 comments

    Privacy Implications Anonymous -- 29/03/06 (in reply to #120131753)

    What I am surprised by is that no-one has noticed section 8.1:

    "ISPs directly responsible for the allocation of IP addresses to their subscribers (eg, all of them) will use all reasonable efforts to retain information pertaining to those allocations for a minimum period of seven days."

    Can someone tell me what this has got to do with spam? Isn't this just a case of our privacy being thrown out the window but disguising it within a "spam act"?

    7 days is a bit of a joke.. what this means in reality is that ISP's will now have to store your account name, IP address and logon-logoff times. Sounds to me like law enforcement want more evidence available for either prosecution or spying.

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured