Aust Customs to launch biometric passport technology early

By Andrew Colley
23 January 2003 03:30 PM
Tags: passports, smartgate, australia, acs, biometrics, image, matching, trial
The Australian Customs Service (ACS) will next week launch its biometric passport checking system "publicly," drastically shortening its trial period and before concerns about how to apply it to all Australians have been resolved.

The technology, Smartgate, was originally to undergo six months testing in a live environment before ACS would rubber-stamp it. Leon Beddington, spokesperson for ACS, said the trial would continue but that early results had been encouraging enough to "move its launch up the agenda".

Smartgate scans each volunteers' face and compares it with a mathematical representation of their facial features derived from four photographs of the individual taken prior to the trial. The representation is then stored on the passport.

According to a Qantas gazette, the system has checked over 6,000 passports belonging cabin crew who volunteered for the trial in its first six weeks of operation, achieving an 80 percent success rate. The ACS had been aiming for a success rate above 90 percent, but according to Beddington the photo-matching technology, the component with which the ACS is concerned, is not to blame for instances in which the system failed.

"The photo-matching technology is working well but ...there will be mismatches caused by the fact that the data on the passport doesn't match other data or it's been incorrectly recorded," said Beddington.

Beddington rejected the notion that the launch was premature, but gave indications that ACS is facing pressure from "overseas influences" to accelerate the Smartgate program.

Beddington would not reveal whether they were commercial, political or regulatory. However, he did say that it was "becoming increasingly difficult to [tell them] we're just trialling it [repeatedly]".

"There has been a lot of overseas interest in the technology what the result of that interest might be we can't discuss," he added later.

The ACS yesterday also refused to address questions concerning how the technology would extend beyond the trial sample group to the Australia's broader population of eight million passport holders.

"The passport's not our business -- our business is whether the face-matching technology works and it does," said Beddington.

The responsibility for transforming the Australian travel documents into a form that Smartgate and Customs will be able to use lies with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's passport authority, Passports Australia.

Passports Australia spokesperson, Bob Nash, said the team tasked with coming up with a method of incorporating the biometric data into Australian passports is facing a hefty dilemma. For its live trial of Smartgate the ACS uses a four image photo-matching technique which, according to Nash, improves its success rate.

Passports Australia already has around three-and-a-half million digital images stored in its databases and wanted to avoid the time and expense required to implement a four-image technique.

"As we've said before we've got millions of [digital] images on record. We've either got to convert our existing data or throw away all the images and start again," said Nash.

To be precise, Passports Australia has three-and-a-half million images and wants to develop a single image technique that can achieve the same level photo-matching success as ACS has with Smartgate.

"Clearly it's in everybody's best interest to make this as simple an exercise as possible. Rather than having to round up people to have four photographs taken of themselves from different angles, it would be much simpler if they were able to have a system where they submit a photograph as they do now," said Nash.

Nash said Passports Australia was unconvinced that the four image technique was necessary and that it had achieved promising results from trials involving matching algorithms from digital images in its database with original images of the subjects.

Nash conceded that the team behind the project -- which must reported to federal Treasury on the progress of its research -- hadn't found a way to save its database yet and that it may have to adopt the four-image technique.

"We are prepared and able to do that if necessary," said Nash.

Talkback 3 comments

    "Overseas interests" ...Joe Citizen -- 24/01/03

    "Overseas interests". Get real! The US is dictating our internal affairs, AGAIN.

    It scans you're face? What hap ...Anonymous -- 24/01/03

    It scans you're face? What happens if the first time you go through as a 7 year old: no beard, mustache etc. 20 years later you come through again: beard, mustache, dyed you're hair. Will it think you're a different person? This sounds like a waste of time. Forget face scanning, lets jump straight to retinal scanning instead.

    Several points to this. A) Joe ...Anonymous -- 27/01/03

    Several points to this.

    A) Joe is right. The USA set a deadline on the introduction of a biometric 'solution' and the Australian Govt is again rushing, tail wagging, to ensure we meet that deadline. They are obviously prepared to sacrafice the real protection and security of Australians against getting a gold star on their international report card from Principal Bush.

    b)Correct. Face scanning is recognised by the biometric community at large as being not only the most easily fooled system with high fallacy ratings, but also the most dangerous to civil liberities because of the way these systems have to keep a database of faces. Consider the facial reconstruction of Nicole Kidman in The Hours and it is easy to see that facial scanning is simply put - BOLLOCKS as an approach to security. In the future, the only way to prevent being on such a database will be not to travel of be part of the community - Minority Report here we come.

    C) Biometric finger scanning with Match-on-Card fingerprint and photo ID is the best solution. This is a duel system which is almost impossible to fool. Someone might be able to fake the fingerprint on the passport, but they have to have the card fingerprint match and so far no one has been able to fake one of these cards. The way these systems work - there is no need for a database to be kept or owned by anyone, in fact it is prevented which makes it a lot more friendly for the civil liberties we fought so hard to gain in this 'democratic' nation. hah!

    The issue is - the Australian Govt will not spend the money to get the right system from the best providers. Instead they are going with some cheapy no name provider that has no credentials in the USA or Europe for projects of such a scale. The Govt will simply compromise the suggested security requirements against the value of having a database of faces and later down the track, we will pay via levies and taxes for them to put in a system that actually works to secure us instead of a system that will work first and foremost to CONTROL us.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Brad Howarth The key Topik is always money
    One of the big problems of the internet is that is practically impossible to keep up-to-date on preferred topics. You can limit your sources, but this can mean missing a lot of valuable data.
  • Array Do we need the legislative blackmail?
    Virtually everyone in the telecommunications industry has their say in the Senate Standing Committee's public hearing into the pending legislation to split up Telstra, in this week's Twisted Wire podcast.
  • Array Give Tax a break for a Change
    Considering the circumstances the Australian Taxation Office's (ATO) Change Program has been operating in over the last few years, it really hasn't been going too badly.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured