Are hired hackers worth the cost?

COMMENTARY: There's one way to prove that security is a necessary IT expense: hire hackers to successfully break into your own network.

CFOs are treating security as a cost item to be controlled--and in some cases, even eliminated. That's the buzz at the recent CeBit trade show.

Despite IT managers wanting to spend more on security, CFOs are putting the brakes on such spending. The latest thinking, apparently, is that the terrorist activity was more than a quarter ago, so it's history. In other words, CFOs are seeing all those security costs on the balance sheet--yet they're not seeing any security problems. (The fact that increased security is heading off problems is lost on them.)

This doesn't surprise me. I've been hearing similar sentiments from people in the US. Outside the IT community, it seems that security is either a business impediment or an unnecessary cost. As a result, CIOs and network managers are under constant pressure to do less, as a way to save money and reduce inconvenience.

Unfortunately, the primary argument to unlock dollars for security infrastructure is that you have to get attacked first. But there's one way to prove that security is a necessary IT expense: hire hackers to successfully break into your own network. That's right--hackers for hire. Though it sounds like an oxymoron, a number of companies, notably Computer Sciences Corporation of El Segundo, California, employ hacker engineers.

These "ethical hackers" will break into your network, take it over, and then produce a security assessment report that uncovers your vulnerabilities. At this point, security is no longer a theoretical issue. You can point to specific tasks you must complete to protect your company's integrity.

Of course, hackers for hire don't come cheap. I heard from some CeBit show attendees that a simple firewall check, for example, can cost US$5,000.

But if your company balks at hiring a hacker and insists on reining in the security budget, remind everyone that you'll be living on borrowed time. Controlling costs is always important, but you can't risk millions of dollars by being lulled into complacency.

Wayne Rash runs a product testing lab near Washington, DC. He's been involved with secure networking for 20 years and is the author of four books on networking topics.

Advertisement

Talkback 1 comments

    If the IT managers don't know how to make their firewalls secure, then hiring someone to check it out is just a "point-in-time" solution. It will be full of holes a few days/weeks later simply cause you still don't know how to manage the firewalAnonymous -- 27/03/02

    If the IT managers don't know how to make their firewalls secure, then hiring someone to check it out is just a "point-in-time" solution. It will be full of holes a few days/weeks later simply cause you still don't know how to manage the firewall.


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • David Braue Will Rudd's bush backhaul bonanza deliver?
    Rural areas will be welcoming the government's decision to put its money where its politicising is, funnelling $250m into a regional fibre upgrade to six rural centres. Remedying over a decade of near-neglect at the hands of telecoms privatisation, the investment could be the firmest step yet for Labor's NBN dream — but with inevitable political questions and a looming election, Rudd and Conroy need to deliver, and quickly, to preserve the NBN's credibility.
  • Array Doing for AV what VoIP did for telephony
    Sydney-based start-up Audinate is making traditional analog cabling obsolete in favour of TCP/IP-based networking technology. And it's doing a pretty good job so far, with its technology used by World Youth Day and the Sydney Opera House.
  • Array WiMax in Australia: Part two
    WiMax could be the standard that drives the next phase of mobile broadband, it provides an opportunity for players wanting to establish a pure IP network to carry voice and data effectively — but is this what operators want?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured