Adobe, others slip counterfeiting code into apps

Adobe and other makers of image-manipulation programs have, at the behest of a little-known group of national banks, inserted secret technology into their programs to foil counterfeiting, the companies acknowledged last week.

Photoshop and other programs will no longer be able to open files containing images of several nations' currencies, said Kevin Connor, director of product management for Adobe. The code to detect such images came from the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group, a low-profile association representing the national banks from Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.

At the request of the group, Adobe and other software companies have inserted the functionality into their programs.

"This is a relatively new thing," Connor said. "We are not the first software application to do this, but we are probably the largest."

While Connor didn't know which currencies were protected by the technology, users of Adobe Photoshop CS and Jasc's Paintshop Pro have complained that files containing images of the new U.S. $20 bill and several Euro denominations cannot be opened. Moreover, Connor stressed that the technology is already included in most colour printers.

The creator of the technology, Digimarc, confirmed that it had produced the code under contract to the banking group, but wouldn't discuss any details.

"Due to the nature of the project, all the players and details are confidential," said Leslie Constans. Jasc, the maker of Paintshop Pro, couldn't be reached for comment.

Little information exists on the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group (CBCDG).

The association was formed in 1993 by the governors of the G-10 central banks, according to the Bank of Canada's annual report. Originally called SSG-2, the group has mainly been given the task of developing a system to deter computer-based counterfeiting. In 2003, the United States gave US$2.9 million to the counterfeit-deterrence program, according to a report from the Federal Reserve. The Bank for International Settlements acts as the association's agent in contractual arrangements, according to information on the BIS's Web site.

The group could not be contacted for comment.

As early as 2000, the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group started approaching companies that made image manipulation programs as well as color printers, asking them to include anticounterfeiting technology in their products. In addition, the European Central Bank has requested that the Commission for European Communities create legislation that would make the inclusion of such technology mandatory.

In the United States, such technology goes beyond the requirements of the law. U.S. artists are able to scan and use the image of currency in their works as long as the image is less than 75 percent or greater than 150 percent of the dimensions of the original bill. Artists are also required to only make single-sided prints of the image and to destroy the digital copy when the work is done.

"The current implementation does not take into account your intent," said Adobe's Connor, who characterised the curtailing of artists rights as just "changing the source of where you would get the images."

Now artists will have to download images from a legal source, such as the U.S. Bureau of Printing and Engraving.

Yet, one poster to Adobe's forums found that even bank-provided images of currencies couldn't be opened. A collage of several denominations from a Swedish bank couldn't be opened.

"This is insane," the person wrote. "Nobody, and certainly not software I pay for, should have any say of what sort of image I am allowed to open."

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    It doesn't really affect me ei ...Tom Kieronski -- 12/01/04

    It doesn't really affect me either way (at this point in time) however I do not agree with specific control since it is more then likely to pave the way for future restrictions on other things.

    Control is OK but too much - and this definately too much control is very very bad. The software makers shoul dbe forced by law to disclose if they are cripled in some way so that consumer at least has some choice before they purchase.

    This also will lead in the demise of large software vendors if they think they have the power over us - the consumers.

    Curbing counterfeit activities ...Lisa Mostyn -- 12/01/04

    Curbing counterfeit activities is a big thing, considering the ease with which money can be duplicated on just the most basic equipment these days.

    As a promotions based business I wonder at the impact this will have in the future. We have a local business that hands out "$5" notes that have been printed with their business info/photos etc as a marketing tool to reward loyal customers. Other business use currency in their advertising literature.

    I am all for stopping crime, but should that really be the realm of the software provider? Shouldn't paper/plastic money have anti counterfeit measures incorporated already? Australia leads the way in anti counterfeit measures on our currency so why don't other countries follow suit instead of blocking legitimate artists or business people.

    I guess all the conterfeiters ...Anonymous -- 12/01/04

    I guess all the conterfeiters will switch to GIMP instead

    I'm guessing that the main cur ...Anonymous -- 12/01/04

    I'm guessing that the main currency to be 'protected' in this way will be the US greenback. This currency is incredibly easy to copy. The ignorant US public always kick up a HUGE stink whenever any changes to to the US currency is proposed. Their 1c 'penny' (pretty much like our apendixes - useless) has been the target for years but phasing it out always meets the most incredible reistance you could imagine.
    Our Ausralian currency is the most secure and the Australian mint actually produces notes for New Zealand and several south american & African countries if I remember correctly.
    Having a transparent window sure makes it difficult to copy.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured