AU security researchers need legal advice: CERT

The technical head of CERT, Jeff Carpenter, says Australian researchers should familiarise themselves with copyright laws in the context of reverse engineering malicious code to avoid hassles with DMCA-like legislation.

"Legal issues have become more and more complicated... I'm not familiar with the law in Australia, but within the United States, the DMCA and other laws are making things complicated," he told ZDNet Australia during a recent interview.

Carpenter says that conducting analysis on malicious code, such as a worm payload or Trojan binary, may result in legal problems stemming from copyright law.

"If you're going to do work in this area you we recommend you consult legal counsel before you... find yourself in a sticky legal situation," he said.

Reverse engineering is a vital tool when responding to severe incidents. By reverse engineering worms and exploits, researchers can look beyond what's happening at that moment and start formulating a response.

"When you have something like [the recent worm] Slammer attacking... you don't necessarily know if there's something else that hasn't been activated yet," he said.

Whilst the legal issue is a concern, it's not an intractable one. Legal advice on how to go about this type of research can protect researchers. CERT has consulted its lawyers and is able to move forward with reverse engineering exercises.

"We have worked out through our attorneys the appropriate way for us to proceed," he said.

When contacted by ZDNet Australia, security consultant Daniel Lewkovitz conceded it's an interesting thought.

"What a wonderful academic argument," he said, pointing out that "copyright would subsist in code you wrote" even if it was malicious. There is always the possibility that other, copyrighted and legitimate code can find its way into malicious binaries, but Lewkovitz doubts there'll be any problems from the authors of malicious binaries or code.

"I wait with bated breath for someone who releases malicious code to go to court on the basis of someone else infringing on their copyright," he said.

Advertisement

Talkback 1 comments

    Here we go again! A "LEGAL" system that says some low-life sending me an unsolicited email/virus/trojan is actually protected, and I have to suffer the consequences with no legal rights. Go figure, lawyers have it too easy.Anonymous -- 21/05/03

    Here we go again! A "LEGAL" system that says some low-life sending me an unsolicited email/virus/trojan is actually protected, and I have to suffer the consequences with no legal rights. Go figure, lawyers have it too easy.


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett PayPal launches Aussie developer program
    PayPal announced the opening of its certification program for Australian developers today, making Australia the first country outside of the US to offer certification.
  • Array Cash cow in a BigTinCan?
    Around one third of Australia's telcos have shut their doors over time, but that isn't stopping new ventures hoping to chip away at carriers' mobile call bonanza. By fighting carriers at the smartphone rather than the home phone, could the latest two contenders be onto something big?
  • Array A third of the way to a zettabyte
    This week on Twisted Wire we look at how internet usage is changing in Australia and around the world. How are we meeting this demand and how is the cost structure changing for the service provider?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured