|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
Commentary: Is Too Much Ellison A Bad Thing?
October 13, 2000 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/soa/Commentary-Is-Too-Much-Ellison-A-Bad-Thing-/0,139023165,120105048,00.htm
Is too much of Oracle CEO Larry Ellison a bad thing? Wall Street sure seems to think so. Investors have used the departure of Oracle Chief Operating Officer Ray Lane as an excuse to cash in shares of the pricey tech titan. In a terse statement ahead of a long weekend, Oracle announced Lane was departing as the company''s operating chief. Lane will remain on Oracle''s board of directors, and the split was amicable. Ellison will assume Lane's role, but not the title. A spokeswoman for Oracle said the company hasn't named a direct replacement. "Nothing has been announced," she said. The translation: Ellison is more immersed in Oracle's day-to-day operations than ever -- and that''s bad news to some investors. Analysts are already split on Lane''s departure, which has been rumored for months. Shares of Oracle have fallen about 16 percent since Lane resignation was announced. Wall Street is worried that Ellison will pump up expectations and not deliver, take too many risks and fail to run a tight ship. Oracle is running smoothly, and Wall Street wants to make sure it stays on course. Last week''s trashgate debacle with Microsoft was just one example of the risks Ellison will take. Analysts split
Meanwhile, CS First Boston reiterated a "strong buy" and played down the concerns about the void left by Lane. Get used to the debate among analysts. Plenty of analysts are still mulling over the meaning of Lane''s departure. When a stock is priced to perfection -- 88 times estimated fiscal 2001 earnings, and 73 times 2002 earnings, according to JP Morgan -- you can''t just shrug over Lane's departure. JP Morgan argued that the best of Oracle's upside surprises are behind it. Just a few weeks ago, Oracle creamed estimates with fourth quarter earnings of 31 cents a share on sales of US$3.4 billion. The first quarter also looks great. The big question is whether Oracle has peaked. Deconstructing Ellison
After the company''s latest upside surprise, Ellison compared Oracle to Microsoft. Oracle could dominate business-to-business e-commerce just like Microsoft dominates office software. Dozens of e-commerce companies -- including main rivals Ariba, Commerce One and i2 Technologies -- disagree with Ellison. Lane's best asset to Oracle may have been the "balance" that Epifanio highlighted. When Ellison would get ahead of himself, Oracle had strong lieutenants to tone things down. A 1999 interview with Oracle CFO Jeff Henley illustrates the point. Ellison's recently appointed lieutenants are unproven when it comes to deconstructing their outspoken leader. Ellison created an executive team -- marketing chief Gary Bloom, Henley and Executive Vice President Safra Catz -- to help manage Oracle''s day-to-day affairs. Of that group, only Henley has the clout to tone down Ellison''s rants. And it's not a one-man job. Stiff competition
Wall Street wants to believe those days are over. There's no need to worry -- yet. But Oracle can''t afford to misfire, or mismanage Wall Street. IBM, Microsoft and SAP are all ready to battle Oracle. If Ellison delegates well and manages expectations, Oracle will do fine. If not, you can expect a rocky stock chart. In either case, we won't know what Oracle will look like until it reports its fiscal first quarter earnings nearly three months from now. Epifanio said he will wait for next quarter's performance and guidance and detailed management succession plans before revisiting Oracle shares. That may turn out to be good advice.TDAIN
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |