|
|
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu
-------------------------------------------------------------- This story was printed from ZDNet Australia. --------------------------------------------------------------
|
It's over -- Mitnick finally sentenced
October 13, 2000 URL: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/soa/It-s-over-Mitnick-finally-sentenced-/0,139023165,120102290,00.htm
LOS ANGELES -- Four years, five months and 22 days after it began, The United States v Kevin Mitnick ended Monday when U.S. District Court Judge Marianna Pfaelzer sentenced the hacker to 46 months in prison. Mitnick was also ordered to pay $4,125 in restitution -- a fraction of the $1.5 million federal prosecutors sought. With credit for good behavior, Mitnick could be free by January 2000. Once released, Pfaelzer ordered the hacker not to touch a computer or cellular telephone without the written approval of his probation officer.
Mitnick pleaded guilty on March 26 to seven felonies, and admitted to cracking computers at cellular telephone companies, software manufacturers, ISPs and universities, as well as illegally downloading proprietary software from some of the victim companies.
Monday's sentence was governed by a plea agreement between Mitnick and his prosecutors, and will run on top of the 22 months he already received for cell phone cloning and a probation violation, for a total of 68 months in prison.
"It's time for him ... to be integrated back into the community," Randolph said.
Pfaelzer, who sentenced Mitnick to a year of addiction treatment in a 1989 case, rejected Randolph's request, and specifically recommended that the Bureau of Prisons keep Mitnick behind bars for the remaining months of his sentence.
Govt. sought US$1.5M restitution
"I want to make a restitution order that is much, much larger. But I can't be sure he can pay it, and any non-payment is going to be a violation of the terms of his release."
Pfaelzer rejected defense allegations that the government improperly manipulated damage figures in the case, and declined to unseal a defense motion calling for sanctions against the prosecutors. At the same time, she encouraged the government to work with Mitnick's lawyers to release a redacted version of the sealed filings. "As a matter of principal," said Pfaelzer, "everything should be public."
'World's Most Notorious Hacker'
Meanwhile, a grassroots campaign built on bumper stickers and demonstrations have complained that Mitnick is a victim of bad press and big business.
After Monday's hearing, prosecutor Chris Painter said Mitnick is no Robin Hood. "In this case there were people whose identities were expropriated, whose credit was expropriated, whose private email was read. There are a lot of damages caused by this kind of activity, and people should be sensitive to that," Painter said.
"For the last five years ... they have prosecuted [Mitnick] and treated him in this case as if he was a computer terrorist," said defense attorney Donald Randolph.
"I think when this case is scrutinized and analyzed -- particularly when the most recent documents come to public scrutiny -- there will be a real evaluation about how this case was prosecuted. I think it was heavy handed, overboard, and a lot of unfair things happened."
Copyright © 2009 CBS Interactive, a CBS Company. All Rights Reserved. |