WA utility takes remote control of customers' aircon

Western Australian energy company Western Power has reduced peak power energy use by 27 percent, or 3.5kW per home, by remotely switching off the compressors in trial customers' air conditioning units for a few minutes.

"This is the equivalent of using four microwaves or two pool pumps. It is a substantial saving," WA Energy Minister Francis Logan said in a statement.

The figure was achieved in a trial run conducted with over 400 participants from Nedlands, Claremont and Dalkeith who volunteered to participate in a trial from January to March this year.

Equipment was installed at the substation and also on individual air conditioners. When a signal was sent down the electricity lines from the substation, the device on the air conditioner turns off its compressor, but not the fan, allowing air to still circulate but without creating any more cool air.

The compressor was turned off at peak periods for seven to 15 minutes.

The compressors were turned off six times during the trial period, with devices varied so not all compressors were shut off at the same time. Western Power staff manually activated the devices when the temperature went over 36 degrees in the peak electricity usage times, betwen 3pm and 5pm in the afternoon.

According to a survey the company carried out after the pilot, many users didn't even notice the compressor being turned off.

The next step, according to the Western Power spokesperson, is more trials.

According to Western Power, peak energy use in Western Australia is driven by air conditioners, with 90 percent of Western Australians owning a unit. Of these, one-third have more than one air conditioning unit in their home.

This trial resembles smart meter initiatives in that it hopes to manage demand, the spokesperson said. But the likeness stops there: "With a smart meter people actually make a conscious choice," the spokesperson continued, whereas with Western Power pilot, the choice is made by the utility.

With reductions in peak power consumption, Western Power can delay on building new infrastructure in the short term, the Western Power spokesperson said.

"The substations, cables, powerlines and other infrastructure that we build to support energy needs are not driven by normal consumption, but by the total peak. We build to cover the times of highest energy use, even if those times only amount to a few days a year," Western Power MD Doug Aberle said in a statement.

"With this trial we were able to measure electricity demand on the Nedlands main powerline and it really showed that 'a little from a lot of people' can deliver a reduction in the peak," he concluded.

Advertisement

Talkback 5 comments

  1. great! Anthony -- 22/05/08

    that is a brilliant idea!!! Can we see that rolled out across the country?

    1. Good Idea Anonymous -- 22/05/08

      It is an excellent idea - we should provide incentives to energy companies to maximise the use of energy rather than simply selling more and more energy to realise profits.

  2. Umm, no - Bad Idea Jehn -- 23/05/08

    What's being sold as a "green" method of saving energy strikes me as nothing but a ridiculous attempt by govt & private industry to avoid the costs involved in improving and redesigning infrastructure. Temporarily cutting power to AC units between 3pm and 5pm will simply prompt customers to switch the AC on a bit earlier to compensate - probably causing a net *increase* in overall power use. Bad for the environment, bad for infrastructure. With 90% of WA homes having at least one AC unit, and 30% having more than one, perhaps the emphasis should be shifted toward energy-efficient buildings? To me, this whole "peak energy-use avoidance" issue smacks of "investment in a sustainable future" avoidance, and is typical of the wasteful "stop-gap" measures (both proposed and implemented) nationwide which divert investment from *real* long term *solutions*: intelligent building design, and emphasis on renewable energy and energy efficiency. The choice of this test in particular highlights the lack of commitment to solar (PV) - baseload supply is irrelevant, as proven by the times the remote switching occurs. This would've been a perfect opportunity to trial new solar (PV) technologies. Take ~20% of the sunlight striking buildings (thus heating them) and converting it to electricity to cool those buildings (thus also reducing the cooling requirements by ~20%)? Apparently that's too sensible. Or undermines the profitability of the coalmining industry. Or negates the Tough Decisions govts need to take regarding building codes. Take your pick. There were many Good Ideas which could've been implemented in this situation - naturally all were ignored in favour of a Bad Idea. How typical, and how shameful. In so many ways: what a waste. :-(

    1. But... Anonymous -- 23/05/08

      While you raise some good points, your cynicism misses the idea that it is probably a good thing that further investment to increase supply has been delayed (given that infrastructure investment is likely to be focused on increasing supply rather than efficiency) - unless, of course, the investment is on renewable sources of power. Forcing the existing supply to meet ever greater demand must lead to innovative solutions and greater efficiencies simply to meet that demand... this is not a bad thing.

      We would all like to see more (and better) measures to deal with power, (as well as climate and water), issues but I do not believe continually increasing supply is the answer.

    2. Intelligent development Jehn -- 23/05/08

      Definitely agreed. The days of low-cost, high-pollution "brute force" energy use is well behind us, and we need to concentrate on intelligent design to replace the existing "dinosaurs". As you say, simply increasing the supply is definitely *not* the answer - although total supply *will* probably increase due to increasing population, "per capita" use is the point which needs to be addressed - and that needs to be done through efficient building design, and 21st Century infrastructure (a term which should, though it notably doesn't in the main article, include / mention power *generation* equipment, methods, and technologies) - the latter including a decentralised power generation system relying on renewable, non-polluting technologies, at the point-of-use wherever possible (thus also minimising the reliance on and need for massive distribution grid infrastructure).

      Although I agree with delaying further investment in current infrastructure (until it becomes totally impractical, hopefully;), I in no way agree with or can understand the delay in investment in above-described described "21st Century" technologies, in an age where pollution reduction is not merely mandated, but desperately needed.

      As much of a proponent of renewables as I am (I have no financial, political or other such interest in any of this, btw), I readily concede that zero-emission baseload supply is not viable in the short term. Peak supply, especially in a country where heat from sunlight is such a problem, is a vastly different matter. We need to learn how to build houses, we need to re-learn how to power them, and we need to re-learn how to *use* that power. And we need to do all that yesterday. Nonsense such as so-called "clean coal" technologies, and limiting of peak-demand use of "dinosaur"-generated power serves only to distract from the important issues, and divert desperately needed funding from them (specifically regarding both installation of the current-generation technologies and development of the next generations) - hence my cynicism regarding the trial referred to in the article. Until I see some major shifts in ideology from both govt and business regarding such matters, I'm afraid my cynicism will remain - I can only hope it's short-lived. I'm not holding my breath. :(

Add your opinion


ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Customs | Murray Harrison, CIO

Australian Customs CIO Murray Harrison dislikes SLAs and runs away if a vendor talks to him about innovation. In this interview, he also explains why getting excited about gadgets can be dangerous and talks about how Customs' outsourcing strategy has evolved.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Munir Kotadia iPhone suckers test our patience
    So how many of you have bought a 3G iPhone? Do you feel like a sucker? If you don't, maybe you will once your first bill arrives.
  • Array Westpac bank: AVG's toughest competitor
    The next time you're buying antivirus software, don't go direct to Symantec or McAfee. Don't download free antivirus. And definitely don't see Harvey Norman. Ask your bank — they're quite literally giving the stuff away.
  • Array Will you manage in the exabyte era?
    Mammoth growth in storage volumes is a fact of life, but even so it's helpful to pause occasionally and try and work out whether our information strategies have fallen hopelessly out of step with the pace of technological growth and changes in costs.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured