Transistor hits 60th birthday

Sixty years ago, on 16 December, scientists at Bell Labs--William Shockley, John Bardeen, and Walter Brattain -- built the world's first transistor and nothing has been the same since.

Fine-tuning ENIAC. J. Presper Eckert (the man in the foreground turning a knob) and John Mauchly (center) designed ENIAC to calculate the trajectory of artillery shells. The machine didn't debut until February 1946, after the end of World War II, but it did launch the computer revolution. Credit: Computer History Museum

We'll be covering the anniversary in subsequent articles, but here's a smattering of some of the implications, in somewhat chronological order, of the event:

1. The dawn of electronics. Vacuum tubes consumed lots of power and were fragile. ENIAC, one of the world's first computers, weighed 28 tons, consumed 170,000 watts of power and required several operators. It conducted 5,000 operations a second. Since the 1930s, Bell Labs had been looking to replace tubes with an electronic switch.

2. The birth of the insane boss. Technically speaking, Bardeen and Brattain invented the first transistor, a point-contact transistor. Shockley, who had been researching the problem for years, came up with the junction transistor, which became the basis of commercial transistors. Brilliant, imperious, and arrogant, Shockley ended up getting most of the credit. (Another Bell Labs employee, John Pierce, came up with the name.)

3. Silicon Valley. There's a good reason that the ISSCC conference, one of the premier confabs for chip designers, that takes place in San Francisco is organised by the University of Pennsylvania. The computer industry (think Sperry) used to be located back East. Fred Terman, then provost of Stanford University, started to recruit people like Shockley, who then recruited people like Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, and Eugene Kleiner, to Santa Clara County. The US$2 million dollar ranch house followed.

4. Predictable progress. One of the remarkable aspects of electronics is that progress is made at a steady, predictable rate. Things get cheaper, faster, and smaller over time. You can't say the same thing about the chemical industry, or pharmaceuticals. If the auto industry followed Moore's Law for even a decade or two, a Rolls Royce would cost less than a dollar and be far faster than the models on the road. (Granted, it would also be less than a centimetre long, but you have to accept some trade offs.)

Making the future foreseeable led to:

5. Venture capital and a booming market for start ups. No one wants to risk putting US$2 billion into a fab, or even US$20 million into a new search company, unless he can anticipate a payout. The predictability of electronics reduced the risks for investors, which in turn freed them to fund "crazy" ventures like Fairchild Semiconductor or Intel. Without predictability, most of the people I know wouldn't have jobs. Which in turn has led to:

6. An interconnected world. Mobile phones, PCs, social networks, the Internet. If transistors didn't get continually faster and cheaper, the mobile phone industry wouldn't be shipping a billion handsets a year. Every few years, some knuckleheads try to declare that Moore's Law, which charts electronics progress, is dead or irrelevant. And they usually research those predictions by going to search engines, which wouldn't exist if servers weren't plummeting in price.

Moore's Law, as it applies to planar silicon, will likely peter out around 2020, but chances are some new materials or structures will be invented that will let progress continue.

So take time out this month to thank the millions of tiny microcircuits in your phone.

Advertisement

Talkback 1 comments

    Typo in the heading Anonymous -- 06/12/07

    Transister ?? Where did the "e" come from?

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured