IceTV wins EPG High Court decision

in brief Australian company IceTV has won a long-running court battle against the Nine Network in which the television station had claimed IceTV's electronic program guide infringed its copyright.

Electronic program guides allow people to better integrate their digital recording devices and media centres with television programming schedules; however, some television stations have objected to the use of the devices on the basis that they own the data included.

Today's judgement in the High Court in Canberra backs IceTV's appeal against an earlier decision by the full Federal Court for the Nine Network, and is based on the High Court action in October 2008.

"Since its incorporation in 2005, IceTV has had one aim: to give TV viewers the freedom to record and manage their TV shows as they choose," IceTV said in a statement. "To record what they want, skip what they want and watch it at a time that suits them. No longer do viewers have to watch their chosen shows when the networks tell them or to watch content they would rather skip through. IceTV gives them this choice."

Advertisement

Talkback 3 comments

    About time Eric in Sydney -- 22/04/09

    Channel 9 are one of the worst for populating their listings with "The Late Movie" followed by "The Late Late Movie" then drifting their schedules so scheduled recordings miss the end.

    Then they fill their programs with a ridiculous amount of padding. If I record an hour of Channel 9, it usually only takes me 30 mins to watch it, becuase I dont have to endure Ad's on high volume, and the 2 minutes before the break, telling me whats coming up after the break.

    I do hope Ice TV keep their description of ACA though following this ruling - it makes me laugh every time.

    Let's get clear what is public domain Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu) -- 22/04/09

    Yes, let's get clear once and for all time what is public domain. Once you tell any member of the public that an event, program or function will be on at such-and-such a time, then that knowledge is public. This is quite different to the content of any program etc, which may be copyright, but the name of the title is NOT copyright.
    Now, if we could just agree that standards documents written by committees of unpaid volunteers to document a common approach to some problem or task are also public domain, by virtue of the non-profit status of those who contriubuted, we'd get a long way. As it stands Building Code of Australia want to charge thousands of dollars for the document that says how a ladder ought be placed against a wall (because practically you need the whole suite of related construction standards)... but if safety was our concern, then we ought care naught for some interposing party seeking to receive monopoly rents for controlling the copyright on such safety advice.

    EXCELLENT Comment Rusty Packer -- 25/04/09 (in reply to #320131092)

    Good on IceTV. AND I heartily endorse the need for free public access to Building Code and all similar Australian standards and safety material. Then everyone can know if your tradesman knows what they are doing - or maybe you can do it yourself better & cheaper. Long live competition & DIY - eliminate the monopolies in the building sector. NZ lets people DIY basic electrical work. But not Australia - apparently Australian's are too stupid - so the monopolistic forces in Govt, Aust. Standards and tradesmen associations think.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured