IBM's 'Microsoft-free' desktop saves '50%' on costs

IBM has made available a Linux-based collection of virtual desktop applications that run on a server without the need for desktop hardware — or Microsoft software, according to a report on Wednesday on The Wall Street Journal's website.

The Linux-based software package, which is available now, runs on a back-office server and is accessible to customers on thin clients, the paper reported.

The Virtual Linux Desktop ranges in price from US$59 to US$289 per user, depending on the level of software and service desired, according to the report. IBM estimates the software package could save corporate customers up to US$800 per user when compared with the cost of maintaining Microsoft's Vista operating system, Office suite and collaboration tools, the newspaper said.

IBM is counting on the prevalent economic pressures to help make its "Microsoft-free" suite more appealing.

"Deploying your technology this way is going to save you something more than 50 per cent of your total costs," Jeff Smith, IBM's vice president for open source and Linux, told the paper. "As customers face an increasingly challenging economic situation, they're looking at everything they're spending money on."

Cost aside, however, corporate customers may not be ready to embrace an environment where their data is stored centrally instead of locally.

Advertisement

Talkback 7 comments

    Your Joking John -- 05/12/08

    "Cost aside, however, corporate customers may not be ready to embrace an environment where their data is stored centrally instead of locally."

    This is the whole basis of the thin client solution model that Citrix has lived and died on!!!! This is nothing new and has been part of ICT for many years

    Hah! Anonymous -- 05/12/08

    ...and here is our army of consultants to get this working for you. Give me a break. If it was this easy it would have happened years ago.

    Interesting to watch developments Anonymous -- 06/12/08

    I wouldn't write-off this approach just yet.
    Maintaining a common operating environment on a branch network of around 20,000 conventional PCs isn't "this easy" nor cheap. The main obstacle to take-up has been the fine print on all thin-client device product collateral - "this product may be withdrawn at any time without notice". The market doesn't go for it, therefore the vendors won't guarantee supply, therefore a large critical PC refresh can't be risked on a tenuous supply contract. The lack of local capability (like storage) is a major plus when security and reliability are paramount.

    it's a matter of when Anonymous -- 06/12/08

    The problem with Citrix was that it was (and still is) poorly designed and overly complicated. All vendors are moving in this direction. When it comes down to it, for the consumer this direction allows for higher levels of management and lower support costs. A users workstations dies, well, they just get a new one and viola, their environment and data is available as soon as you switch on the replacement. Corporate customers want technology like this, as the cost of ownership is tremendously lower (over time) than everyone having their own desktop. Whether IBM actually get it right is another question entirely - someone will though.

    Good on them! Anonymous -- 06/12/08

    IBM actually have some pretty cool stuff in this space - their thin-client roadmap is streets ahead of HP and Wyse and in more in step with some of the newer VDI products - such as VMWare View. They have embraced Teradici which (if you are already a VMWare View customer) aligns closely with both HP and VMWare's brokers.

    They are also positioning themselves as an IGEL reseller - which is great if you're just looking to 'thin' your existing desktop fleet initially. Then (as one of the other comments alluded to) you simply replace those desktops with thin-client devices when they die.

    A Linux-based solution is also very attractive as it reduces the Microsoft OEM and VECD Licensing components that have been weakening VDI business cases for years!

    "without the need for desktop hardware" M0TT -- 08/12/08

    I always find this amusing - if there is no desktop hardware - then how does a user access the system?

    Thin client, pc, laptop, pda are all "hardware" needed to get to the back end system - yes they reduce desktop complexity, but the fact remains that there is a box on the users desk which has a need for maintenance support.

    "without the need for desktop hardware" Anonymous -- 08/12/08 (in reply to #320118247)

    With all due respect, I reckon you have not truly understood the meaning of a thin client system. May I recommend reading up on it?

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Darren Greenwood Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • Array iiNet: The whys and what nows
    Last week the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not responsible for copyright violation by their customers. This is an important decision not just for iiNet, which spent around $4 million defending the case, but for all ISPs in Australia and, indeed, globally.
  • Array Govt, hurry up with releasing data
    A programmer scraped data from the My School website to make some really cool heat maps showing regions of smart schools — no thanks to the government, which didn't supply the data in any useful kind of format.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured