EnergyAustralia suffers back-up catastrophe

exclusive EnergyAustralia is scrambling to restore business critical data "lost" as a result of back-up failures that went undetected for several months.

The fault was only discovered last month when a problem with a server caused data loss at a number of EnergyAustralia offices, including its Sydney headquarters.

In a recent internal e-mail to employees, Don Anderson, EnergyAustralia executive general manager for shared services, said: "The back-ups were affected by an underlying, undetected software problem that had been damaging the back-ups for a number of months."

An analysis has shown that "one quarter of the total files (about 1.2 million files) that were on the back-up tape of December 12 2006" were still missing, Anderson wrote in the e-mail seen by ZDNet Australia.

The energy utility and its contractor Fujitsu spent the Christmas/New Year period attempting to recover lost files from a number of shared drives. However, their efforts have been hampered by damaged back-up tapes. To minimise the impact on staff, EnergyAustralia is in the process of a second "major restoration attempt" -- which it expects to finish this month, according to Anderson.

New hardware has been purchased to aid the second restoration attempt. The additional hardware will help restore files without overwriting those already recovered, he added.

EnergyAustralia is more optimistic about this exercise, however, Anderson did not guarantee staff that all missing files would be restored.

"We expect this second major restoration will deliver a more comprehensive restoration of the back-up tapes of 12 December, but it is not guaranteed. Our aim is to restore the missing files.

"If the restoration is successful users should be aware that the recovered versions of some files may be weeks or even months old. Beyond this restoration there is little chance that we will be able to retrieve any additional files by other means," Anderson wrote.

What's on tape?
In his e-mail, Anderson said it was attempting to recover business critical files and directories. "There is a range of documents that may need to be recreated, including some regulatory documents," an EnergyAustralia spokesperson told ZDNet Australia.

As a New South Wales state-owned corporation, the utility company has to submit regulatory documents on its activities. It is ZDNet Australia's understanding that its submission is due early this year.

The EnergyAustralia spokesperson, however, said the back-up failure isn't expected to affect its provision of documents by deadline.

Both EnergyAustralia and Fujitsu have refused to comment on their roles in the incident or who was responsible for the back-up procedure.

However, EnergyAustralia is investigating the matter and has committed to an independent audit of its IT systems, the spokesperson said.

Linus Torvalds

When asked if it is considering legal action against Fujitsu, the spokesperson said: "EnergyAustralia is still investigating this matter so that is not something we are looking at, at this stage".

A Fujitsu spokesperson said it would co-operate fully with EnergyAustralia in any investigation into the matter. "As one of a number of suppliers to EnergyAustralia and in the spirit of our partnership, Fujitsu is working closely with EnergyAustralia to restore data lost as a result of a SAN incident on Friday, 22 December," she added.

Advertisement

Talkback 10 comments

  1. Guess it happens? Jesse-Lee Stringer -- 17/01/07

    After years of backups I doubt many people actually test their backup solutions on a different PC/Hardware configuration.

    I've tested a few DVDR backups of small business's only to find that it was backed up in the incorrect format.

    Not to be cautious means throwing those details into the trash. Something no business should do.

  2. Who ran the backups? Net Admin -- 18/01/07

    Was it the secretary?
    the janitor?
    did they even have anyone responsible for the backups?

    Sadly until we realise that backups are more critical than the data itself...we suffer

    We pay surgeons millions to work on our brains...we pay network/backup administrators peanuts to maintain our data...

    go figure...

  3. What happened to the good ol' review and testing? Anonymous -- 18/01/07

    Yes these things happens.

    But it could have easily been avoided. This is not a failure of the technology, it is a failure in their process and (more likely) not enough emphasis on reviewing, testing and understanding how important their data is, until its too late of course. Spend money on the go-fast parts, but what about the if's and when's we lose it all? Go fast past are replaceable.....

    Do you think this customer will review and make some changes to their backup strategies now - you bet. My opinion is these changes should have occurred earlier - I just hope the customer avoids the temptation in blaming the software (and/or hardware).

  4. Put your hands up for detroit Anonymous -- 18/01/07

    We think the backup admin was playing hungry hippo during the failure.

    Then he started playing guess who when the back up failed.

  5. say what?? Anonymous -- 18/01/07

    I think someone forgot to include it in the backup in the first place.... and someone forgot to TEST the backup.... and of course the DR plan is still in development.... and i would say that the backup software used was not *nix based... :-)

  6. Backup test slobba -- 18/01/07

    Now you would assume that the backups were automatically checked at the very least.
    Isn't it a simple matter of ticking the box labelled "verify backup" ??

    1. Verify Backup = fool's paradise J Anderson -- 18/01/07

      "Damaged tapes" could be spin. The verify process only checks that the data written is correctly on the media.

      Most backup issues occur because the backup set is incomplete, either because major parts of the file system are not included in the backup set, or because incremental backups are being done and they are mishandled or the backup software has a bug.

      None of these scenarios are picked up by "verify backup", which is a fool's paradise... IMHO

  7. The answer is simple .... Anonymous -- 18/01/07

    Why ?
    Energy Australia outsorce IT to other companies, they bid - cheapest
    quote got it. Now they have:
    Escalation Manager, chase manager, bulls>> manager and guess
    what - very few system engineers who suppose to support the whole infrastructure. They swamped with calls,emails,projects, meetings and frustrated with clients ( who just making unreasinable demands - they never did it themselves, but..) and own management,who is not actually hiring enough people to do the job
    ( probably to get bigger bonusus from savings ). Backups is low priority and to make them working ,test,run DR - it is a very big call. I worked in many big companies and have not seen done it properly.
    THATS the case PLEASE hire enough people,keep experience staff,
    train it,pay them propely- reduce aqmount of useless managers and
    jobwise it will be OK.
    IT IS NO miracle - nobody could do the job which cost 1 dollar for 50 cents and still make a profit !!!!!
    Why nobidy want to understand it ??

    1. Absolutely right Anonymous -- 19/01/07

      I too have been in the traps for a long time and DR's have taken many backward steps due to cost cutting/culling. The so called backup tapes are often the responsibilty of a sec. who casualy drops them in her handbag on her way out.(off storage. ha!).
      If you skimp on this you pay the price.

  8. I wonder how much the CIO is paid ??? Jay Elliot -- 22/01/07

    You would expect the CIO is paid over a quarter of a million dollars, tax payer dollars, mind you... and where is her accountability in all this. Where is the value she brings? What systems, processes and long term strategies has she put in place to assure these most fundamental of IT delivery needs are met. And more importantly, who hired this person and what were their expectations.
    This is not the fault of a backup administrator nor an outsourcer, these systemic failures start from the top.
    So what will it be next week???

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Department of Defence | Greg Farr, CIO (part two)

In the second part of his interview, Defence CIO Greg Farr talks about outsourcing, the skills crisis and reveals his most urgent IT priority.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Angus Kidman I'm a celebrity, don't back me up
    Celebrity comes with its perks — free alcohol, better-looking partners, lots of holiday time — and disadvantages — constant media intrusions, being forced to appear in films with Eddie Murphy for the long-term good of your career, and having to do mindless radio interviews with angry men who've been awake since 4am.
  • Array Lies, damned lies and telco stupidity
    Earlier this month, Telstra put out a press release trumpeting that it's come up with a new phone coaching service to help people who are "bamboozled" by their mobiles. Another excellent example of wrongheaded thinking from the mobile industry.
  • Array Dear carriers: More walking, less talking
    Sometimes, a well-placed and well-timed letter can make all the difference. Other times, it can make no difference at all — and even hurt your case. This week's missive by the Competitive Carriers' Coalition, I would suggest, falls into the latter category.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured