3Com seeks $66m divorce money over failed merger

Networking vendor 3Com will chase private equity firm Bain Capital Partners for a US$66 million merger break-up fee after its proposed suitor pulled the plug on their merger deal late last week citing regulatory concerns.

3Com was set to be sold to Bain Capital Partners, with a 16 percent minority stake being sold to Chinese networking vendor Huawei Technologies, under a US$2.2 billion agreement signed in October 2007.

Bain Capital pulled out of the deal late last week, concerned that the US government's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) was intent on scuttling the deal citing national security concerns.

The merger has been under question by US regulators due to Huawei's ties to the Chinese government and 3Com's base of US government customers. 3Com's network security subsidiary, TippingPoint, for example, counts the US Department of Defence as one of its customers.

Want to know more?

For all the latest news, analysis and opinion on networking, click here

Several times in the last six months the merger deal stalled as Bain and 3Com adjusted the agreement in an attempt to meet the regulator's approvals. At one stage, the duo even included a proposal to divest TippingPoint as part of the transaction.

Bain claims it pursued all avenues to see the merger go ahead, but felt it could not get the agreement approved by CFIUS.

3Com responded with a statement saying that it "does not believe that Bain Capital Partners' attempt to terminate its merger agreement with 3Com is valid".

"3Com believes that the reasons cited in Bain Capital's press release are not grounds for termination of the agreement," the company said.

The networking vendor's shareholders voted to approve the now-defunct deal in a meeting last Friday in the hope of salvaging the US$66 million termination fee from Bain.

Talkback 0 comments


ZDNet Video

A snake-inspired robot
AVG Anti-Virus Free 8
Moving beyond Microhoo

Watch more videos on ZDNet Australia

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Department of Defence | Greg Farr, CIO (part two)

In the second part of his interview, Defence CIO Greg Farr talks about outsourcing, the skills crisis and reveals his most urgent IT priority.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Liam Tung Gold star for the ATO
    If Australia is going to take information security seriously, we need more people like the ATO's CIO, Bill Gibson.
  • Array It seemed like a good idea at the time
    Last week, I lamented the growing tendency to slam perfectly valid technologies as unsuitable for new uses, just because they prove to be unsuited for applications for which they are inherently unsuited.
  • Array Virtually large but apparently small
    You've only got to hang around a datacentre for about 30 seconds before someone starts raving on about virtualisation. While the cost benefits of virtualisation are obvious, the management challenges often get swept under the carpet.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured