auDA seeks public input as domain rules change

Australia's domain name regulator is to seek public input as it reviews the rules for registering certain types of Australian domains.

In October .au Domain Administration (auDA) announced it was considering changing the "close and substantial connection rule", which allows companies to register domain names that are connected to their business in some way.

auDA's chief executive Chris Disspain told ZDNet Australia this week comment would soon be sought.

"We expect to run a public consultation early in the new year," he said.

The news comes as some portions of Australia's Internet community have intensified criticism on some companies allegedly using the close and substantial connection rule to register domain names for the primary purpose of capturing Web traffic and selling click-through advertising.

auDA cited this practice -- which sees domain names lie fallow without a Web site associated with them -- as one of the reasons it was considering changing the rule.

One Australian Web designer told ZDNet Australia she was personally tracking the actions of a party who owned a variety of domain names and had recently allocated them to a domain name server associated with this type of so-called 'pay-per-click' type of advertising.

Jess Latherson said she had noticed the domains had been moved because she was monitoring one for one of her clients.

She added she searched for the contact details of other domains she knew were owned by the party concerned and saw that they too had been moved.

"I'd suggest that this move ... of his domains to a pay per click domain name monetisation service signifies that the domains will not be used for actual Web sites but soley holding pages that earn revenue for him ... but don't benefit Australian Web users," Latherson concluded.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 1 comments

  1. Domain Crap! Anonymous -- 05/12/05

    What a load of S**t!. This is typical of the AUDA. It will however end up in court once someone is serverly affected.

    Look at Deepbluesea they have 5 million dollars worth of domains that are used for advertising and every single domain company make more revenue forwarding domains than selling them. A

    At then end of the day there is only ONE solution. First in first serve!!like the U.S otherwise our courts will be filled with passing off and trademark cases, and the Virgin Mary ends up in breach of passing off!

    The reality is that we end up with companies like www.sedo.co.uk and the way you protect yourself is buy the domains that have an impact on your business


Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Australian Govt funds IT start-ups
    This week Australia's Federal Government announced it had allocated $3.6 million in funding to 57 local research projects so that they could be commercialised, with many of them being web or IT-related start-ups.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured