What shall we do with a half-sold Telstra?

-The competition regime is failing, the regulatory regime is incredibly complex and cumbersome. Services in the bush are inadequate, and Australia is falling behind the rest of the world on broadband uptake," said Shadow Minister for Communications, Lindsay Tanner, in an exclusive interview with ZDNet Australia.

-We remain steadfastly opposed to [full] privatisation of Telstra and would vote against any legislation bought before parliament," he said. -It would lead to a giant private monopoly that would extend its reach into other markets, and concentrate on profitable segments at the expense of less profitable areas."

The discussion paper released by Tanner, -Reforming Telstra", received support from telecommunications analyst Paul Budde. It outlines the Opposition's problems with Telstra and some possible solutions, including the structural separation of Telstra. However, Tanner emphasised that the paper was for discussion and was not Labor policy.

-We have no preferred position at this point," he said. -We are in a policy review process which will culminate in the national conference sometime next year. The discussion paper was just that, a discussion paper intended to spark a broad national debate in telecommunications in Australia."

Senator Alston entered the debate by claiming the proposal would sell off the high-growth assets of Telstra while leaving the least profitable infrastructure in government hands, which would have to compensate current shareholders. Telstra finance director John Stanhope told a Senate inquiry that a structural separation would destroy up to AU$13 billion of shareholder value.

-Mr Stanhope was misleading the Senate, because the report he was referring to was accounting for the Government's proposals, and only mentioned structural separation indirectly," Tanner said in response. -It was a brief, sketchy observation without any supporting research."

-When BT announced it planned to structurally separate itself, the share market reaction in Britain was quite benign. They ended up doing something else, but it's a good indication there is no reason to assume any particular reaction of the share market."

Tanner believes the Government will attempt to sell Telstra before the next election. -It's a red hot certainty," he said, adding there was nothing the Liberals could offer that would induce Labor to support the legislation.

-I believe a privatised Telstra would be too powerful to regulate and it would not be possible to guarantee high quality outcomes to regional Australia and consumers in general," Tanner said.

Advertisement

Talkback 4 comments

    Sell the other half or buy bac ...Anonymous -- 31/05/02

    Sell the other half or buy back the other half.
    TELSTRA (and its shareholders) should not be held solely responsible for providing unprofitable services. Many forget that OPTUS cost the Taxpayer a fortune to set up so that the taxpayer could have the benefits of competition.I prefer (for many reasons) that all telecommunications be controlled by the Public. Liberal deregulation does nothing for me. Labour social justice does even less.

    With the Governement to dole o ...fenn007 -- 29/07/02

    With the Governement to dole out AU$705.8 million over the next three years in universal service obligation (USO) subsidies, I bet that won't happen when it's privatized.

    The Government will just say "User Pays" just as it's saying for the airports it's just sold off.

    So guess who gets it in the neck again? the poor rural community.

    Telstra cannot be sold off without IRON CLAD conditions of sale.

    I believe that Telstra should ...Anonymous -- 21/08/02

    I believe that Telstra should have the retail arm sold off (privatised) which would make them an even player in the market like any other carrier.
    All players in the market would also then have to put money into the "kitty" to support rural area infrastructure govenred by the ACA, ACCC or one of those Govt bodies who look after the peoples interest.
    Then make the wholesale division of telstra a neutral party.

    Australians should demand that ...a4nic8er -- 27/11/02

    Australians should demand that the RatBags in Canberra split Telstra into two, retaining the physical infrastructure assets as a government-owned wholesaling utility and let Telstra Corporation become the retail/media/public relations giant it desires to be. Then Telstra would no longer need to bear the burden of trying to explain to more than 1 million potential customers why it's wholesale division cannot provide products that it's retail division spends millons of dollars advertising.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • Array NZ farmers: Bleating about broadband
    As we know, farmers are such bleaters. They bleat as much as the four-legged woolly things in their paddocks. If it's not the weather, it's the strength of the dollar! Nothing is ever right. Likewise with rural broadband.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured