Web porn blocking sparks war of words

Jo Best, ZDNet Australia

14 August 2007 03:16 PM

Tags: web, porn, police, library, liberal, labor, isp, internet

The government and its Labor rivals have been indulging in a slanging match over the Coalition's plans to introduce Internet porn blocking software.

Communications Minister Helen Coonan has slammed the Labor party's plans for mandatory ISP-level filtering which would see service providers forced to block pornographic content over Internet connections to households, schools and libraries.

Coonan labelled the policy a duplicate of a scheme already in use in the UK. "Labor's one policy idea is a complete cut and paste of British Telecom's proprietary Internet filter product, 'Cleanfeed'.

But I am not surprised that Kevin Rudd has done little more than dust off Kim Beazley's old Internet safety policy and re-launch it last week," she said in a statement.

The Cleanfeed system, introduced by BT in 2004, works by blocking attempts to access any child pornography Web sites found on the Internet Watch Foundation's blacklist.

Labor communications spokesman Stephen Conroy also accused his government counterpart of rehashing old policies and calling on the government to go further in its filtering plans.

"Labor believes ISP filtering is urgently needed to protect Australian children from accessing harmful or inappropriate online content. Labor considers that the Australian government should do all that it can to protect Australian children online and that the government should go further and mandate ISP level filtering," he said.

Under the government plan, home users and libraries will be able to request filtering software, either at an individual level, where the blocking application is installed on users' PCs, or at an ISP level.

The AU$189 million NetAlert -- Protecting Australian Families Online program will go live from 20 August, with several new measures including the introduction of more AFP Online Children Sex Exploitation Team officers, more funding for the Director of Prosecutions and an AU$22 million online safety campaign.

Coonan also criticised Labor leader Kevin Rudd's Kevin 07 campaign, which kicked off last week.

"As far as families are concerned, Mr Rudd would do better spending less time working on his Kevin07 Internet site and more time working on their Internet concerns," she said.

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

  1. Filtering Doesn't Work James Purser -- 14/08/07

    Sigh.

    Despite the fact that study after study has shown that ISP level filtering doesn't work, both parties insist on trotting it out.

    Sure, let parents manage their own filtering, but don't enforce a broken technology on the rest of the country.

  2. -_-" Anonymous -- 15/08/07

    Not only does filtering at the ISP level cause many problems, but it is also a line that I am not prepared to have our government cross. Once they start filtering stuff at the ISP level like porn, it is unlikely they will stop there.

    I am all for giving customers software/modems that lets them decide what content to block thought. They could subscribe to which ever blacklists they wish (porn, video sites, torrent sites etc) so that they have total control over how their family uses the net.

  3. Censorship ? Keith Styles -- 15/08/07

    Politicians love to control the population. They try it on at every opportunity. It took a world war to stop Adolf Hitler from trying this sort of nonsense.
    As an adult, I will make the decisions about what I want to look at on the Internet.
    It is a parent's responsibility to control their children, not the Government or some nebulous bureaucrat.

  4. ISP filtering S Collins -- 16/08/07

    This is totally wrong for the following reasons:

    1. The Internet was never meant for children
    2. If children do access the 'net, then it is the parents' responsibility to either keep an eye on them or set up their own filter system.

  5. Nanny State.... steeve pink -- 16/08/07

    Another example of the government 'protecting' us from our own stupidity (or free choice) whether we ask for it or not.

    Unfortunately there are minority groups that have the 'ear' of the government who insist that the government should take care of them in every way.

    So the government in an attempt to appease noisy minorities spends ridiculous amounts of our own money in wasteful ways. What do they care? They didn't earn the money. They just want the noise to stop and the spotlight to highlight their own well polished public egos.

    The fact is that there are morons out there procreating with no intention of raising decent human beings and it is because of this reality that governments are looked upon to be 'parents' to most of the population.

    In an ideal world..........

    1. Freedom for all Sydney Lawrence -- 27/08/07

      Never in my life have I read comments so important, truthful and beautifully constructed with reference to Howard's censorship.

      I remember, some time ago, when a high ranking person in Germany ordered the burning of books so as to dominate the population.

      Let's keep Australia free from these stand over bureaucrats, and many thanks to ZDNet Australia for the forum to express our views.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

ZDNet's CIO Vision Series

Department of Defence | Greg Farr, CIO (part two)

In the second part of his interview, Defence CIO Greg Farr talks about outsourcing, the skills crisis and reveals his most urgent IT priority.

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Jude Willis Why eBay tried to screw Aussie users
    Now that the bizarre ruckus over eBay's proposed PayPal monopoly appears totalled, it seems a good time to ponder why eBay chose Australia to risk its reputation on such a massively unpopular scheme.
  • Array The more things change…
    With all the excitement over the iPhone, few people have noticed that 1 July was the 11th anniversary of the deregulation of Australia's telecommunications market.
  • Array I'm a celebrity, don't back me up
    Celebrity comes with its perks — free alcohol, better-looking partners, lots of holiday time — and disadvantages — constant media intrusions, being forced to appear in films with Eddie Murphy for the long-term good of your career, and having to do mindless radio interviews with angry men who've been awake since 4am.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured