VoIP peering being roped in?

commentary It makes sense for Australia's fledgling Internet telephony providers to work together.

Renai LeMay, ZDNet Australia Telco analyst firm Telsyte estimates there are as many as 200,000 consumers in Australia using Voice over IP (VoIP) technologies from vendors like Skype, iiNet, engin, Laurel Stream and Freshtel.

It's difficult to find out exact numbers, but there are also tens of thousands of people at corporates hooked up to VoIP systems. For example, a deployment of 4,500 VoIP handsets was recently announced at Deakin University.

However, the level of interconnection between the networks these end users are on is poor.

For example, customers of major consumer players engin and iiNet who call friends using other VoIP providers typically find their calls traversing the public switched telephone network (PSTN) at some point.

This is despite the fact that all the vendors involved use networks based on the Internet Protocol (IP) to connect calls.

A similar situation occurs in the corporate world, where even if company A and B both have VoIP systems, calls between the two are likely to need to go back onto the PSTN somewhere in the middle.

This situation where pure IP traffic has to be converted to traverse the PSTN and back again doesn't make technical sense and is costly to boot. That's why it needs to be changed, and peering -- where network carriers exchange data freely between each other -- is the likely solution.

Peering in the data carriage world has been taking place in Australia for some time, but is only just starting to gain traction in the land of VoIP. For example, carriers like Unwired, Internode and Pacific Internet connect their networks together in datacentre specialist Equinix's Sydney facility to avoid the cost of pushing more traffic onto Internet backbones owned by large carriers like Optus and Telstra.

According to Equinix's local managing director Doug Oates, the company is looking into VoIP peering in the United States. And some moves may be in the pipeline locally, according to one local telco.

"VoIP peering is one of the product extensions that I am looking at -- not our highest priority but something we will trial next year," iiNet's chief technology officer Greg Bader told your writer this week.

engin too, is looking into peering, according to the company's chief executive Ilkka Tales, who said recently he was investigating several partnerships.

However the presence of dodgy VoIP operators, or "cowboys" in the industry could be slowing down the process.

"I receive a number of approaches each week (domestic and internation providers)," said iiNet's Bader. "As you can imagine these parties range from significant players to small 'opportunistic' start-ups."

"Given that we have spent considerable time and money in developing a quality solution (compliance, Quality of Service etc), we need to choose our partners carefully," he added.

The rigid criteria Bader uses to pick peering partners echoes concerns voiced by his colleagues at other telcos during last week's annual VoIP forum held by regulatory assistant the Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF).

While the forum agreed several VoIP "cowboy" companies who didn't play by the normal telco rules had recently been reined in or had "ridden off into the sunset" (exited the market), there was still concern about bad behaviour.

For example, Telsyte managing director Shara Evans said a third of all consumer VoIP providers were not meeting their obligations under the nations' telecommunications legislation.

In this context, it's unlikely VoIP peering will really take off (other than a few isolated agreements) until the shifting VoIP landscape becomes significantly more mature than it is today. If you've invested a lot of money in your VoIP product it's wise to pick your neighbours carefully after all.

What do you think about VoIP peering -- should providers work together or keep to themselves? Send your thoughts to renai.lemay@zdnet.com.au.

Talkback 2 comments

    Peering Anonymous -- 15/12/05 (in reply to #120125244)

    Peering VoIP services at present would open such a huge can of worms it's not worth it. The cowboy operators wouldn't quite get it, amd they'd end up subsidising the larger players. ENUM almost makes sense but until everyone takes it on and also removes their incoming restrictions will we see anything. Engin etc. all block incoming calls from other VoIP providers so there's not much hope of providing a full integrated VoIP service for all aussie users just yet.

    In the US plenty of providers have peering arrangements - you simply dial a prefix before your number and it routes to the other provider. We still have a bit of a way to go though.

    <a href=www.sipbroker.com>www.sipbroker.com</a> is an interesting concept - you can use a prefix after dialing a local number to call quite afew networks - however the big ones have inbound calls from non-registered users blocked.

    Peering - How to grow their market Peter H -- 19/12/05

    Once they do start peering, this will actually drive up their business. Maybe they will still charge for the call (say 3c per call peered compared to 10c per call to PSTN). This would mean they'd still be getting their margins on the calls, but making a huge discount comapred to their already cheap call costs to PSTN (based on a PSTN call currently having a 7c termination fee - I'm guessing as to what it is but it is approx this). I wouldn't expect it to be free as they do have costs and Australia is a small market, but free (or 1c) would be GREAT!

    Being able to call most other VOIPers for 5% or less of a landline call (ie 1c compared to 20c from landline) would probably make the market explode. The biggest thing holding it back is that you still need a Telstra landline for DSL - so changing a $29 line rental into $18.50 + $9.95 for VOIP means the only saving is in calls - and for low-users or those mostly using local calls, their isn't much incentive to go and buy a $150 adapter to plug your existing phone in, just to save a few cents on a local call. But making that call (almost) free if you and your friends got that adapter, regardless of which company, could be the thing that lights the fuse!

    This would also put them over & above the cowboys - the reputable companies would peer and those outside this group would be left behind, blocked in the same way they are now.

    Would this be seen as a cartel etc by the ACCC? Maybe, but as long as it is open for others to join as long as they meet certain requirements, then I would hope it'd be ok.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Brad Howarth The key Topik is always money
    One of the big problems of the internet is that is practically impossible to keep up-to-date on preferred topics. You can limit your sources, but this can mean missing a lot of valuable data.
  • Array Google open-sources JavaScript tools
    Google announced overnight the release and open-sourcing of a trio of tools designed to help JavaScript developers.
  • Array Do we need the legislative blackmail?
    Virtually everyone in the telecommunications industry has their say in the Senate Standing Committee's public hearing into the pending legislation to split up Telstra, in this week's Twisted Wire podcast.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured