NBN - Everything you need to know about the National Broadband Network

Terria wants FTTN profit sharing with govt

The Federal government will be able to share in any profits generated by the multimillion dollar national fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) network if Terria's bid wins out, with the consortium's chairman revealing that its proposal would see network financed via an equity-debt mix.

"Currently it's a feature of our bid that the Federal government for its up to AU$4.7 billion commitment should be able to take a substantial part as an equity investment," Michael Egan, chairman of the consortium formerly known as G9, Terria, told ZDNet.com.au.

While debt investors lend money which is paid back, equity investors provide funds in return for a part of future profits and a say in how the business will be run.

"We think equity participation would be ideal," Egan said, adding that the government would receive returns, and could divest its share when it wanted.

Being able to hold equity in the network is not a condition of submitting a bid — the government only requires that a return be made on the public money invested. However, equity participation has been on the cards in the past according to Egan. "They've indicated previously that they would be interested in equity involvement," he said.

An equity model will mean structural separation as a matter of course, Egan added.

"As soon as you have a separate company, the fiduciary duty of management and directors is different than if the network was owned by one player," he said, with the management forced to "treat all the access seekers at arms length".

Using the debt-equity funding model will also make the passage of investors' funds transparent, rendering the project more attractive in a tight debt market, according to Egan.

The percentage of equity and debt is still being worked out, the Terria head noted.

"It's not rocket science — you've just got to get the balance right," he concluded.

Telstra declined to comment on whether it favours a fully debt model or a debt-equity mix to finance its bid for the broadband network.

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

    Mums the word.Sydney Lawrence -- 23/06/08

    Suzanne am I correct in believing that participants in the NBN Tender were instructed to maintain silence on their bids. If so what motivates the TERRiA Group?

    wha??Anonymous -- 23/06/08

    consumers dont want to be screwed by Telstra or the Government. This bid is set to fail.

    Anything other than telstraAnonymous -- 23/06/08

    @ wha?? : The article is referring to "Terria" not "Telstra".

    I welcome such a model and as a consumer I am just crossing my fingers that Telstra do not get the tender. I have had enough of being screwed over by Telstra and the Gov must know that this is exactly what they will do if they get it.

    Is this the same person?In an empty office at work refusing to quit -- 24/06/08

    Isn't the MD of the Terria bid the same person who ran Soul into the ground?

    The same person that allowed most of their infrastructure and performance fall behind their competitors?

    The same person that put people into empty offices and not giving them work so they would quit instead of handing out redundancies?

    The same person that has is now expected to take $4.7B of taxpayer money to invest into the IT equivalent of the Snowy Mountains Scheme?

    Good luck Australia, it looks like we will all need it!!!

    umm isnt it the same??Anonymous -- 24/06/08

    if terria and the govt enter into a profit share arrangement, doesnt debt-equity give the govt a say in how things are run?
    isnt it the sme as the govt taking a profit from telstra?
    then setting legislation to direct how telstra works...
    am i missing something, or are these bids essentially going to end up with the same result....exactly what we have now!

    HellstraAnonymous -- 24/06/08

    Tel$tra has had a monopoly since its inception and every time i hear somthing about them or some press release from the PR department all that comes to mind is a spoiled child whinging that instead of making x.xx billion PROFIT a year that they will be making .01% less a year.

    TEL$TRA SHOULD BE SPLIT (network/retail) IT WAS STUPID TO THINK OPERATIONAL SEPERATION WOULD WORK WHEN IT HASN'T ELSEWERE.

    SPLIT TEL$TRA!

    Hor$e boltedAnonymous -- 24/06/08 (in reply to #320104893)

    It wa$ a path that was cho$en a long time ago and without ripping up foundation$ and $tarting again any further $eparation today will be bound to fail.

    Look I am $mart, I can use $tupid character$ to replace letter$!!!

    I AL$O KNOW HOW TO YELL!!!

    Grow up and wake up.Sydney Lawrence -- 25/06/08 (in reply to #320104923)

    Do the Telstra haters really think that by childish remarks about Telstra that they will have any effect on Telstra. I think they are a pack of losers and will remain so until they can express their argument in a sensible adult way.

Add your opinion


Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Chris Duckett PayPal launches Aussie developer program
    PayPal announced the opening of its certification program for Australian developers today, making Australia the first country outside of the US to offer certification.
  • Array Cash cow in a BigTinCan?
    Around one third of Australia's telcos have shut their doors over time, but that isn't stopping new ventures hoping to chip away at carriers' mobile call bonanza. By fighting carriers at the smartphone rather than the home phone, could the latest two contenders be onto something big?
  • Array A third of the way to a zettabyte
    This week on Twisted Wire we look at how internet usage is changing in Australia and around the world. How are we meeting this demand and how is the cost structure changing for the service provider?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured