Telstra wins ACCC court battle

update The Federal Court of Australia today found the national competition regulator did not treat Telstra fairly when slugging the telco with a competition notice 12 months ago.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) issued the notice -- which allows third parties to take legal action to recover damages resulting from anti-competitive conduct -- to Telstra after the telco raised prices on wholesale line rental services.

The nation's number two telco Optus immediately seized on the move as grounds for Federal Court legal action against Telstra for damages in the range of tens of millions of dollars. However, the ACCC has since withdrawn the competition notice, and Telstra today claimed a further victory on the issue.

"This morning Justice Bennett of the Federal Court handed down her long awaited decision declaring illegal a competition notice issued against Telstra in April last year," a statement issued by the telco this morning said.

"Justice Bennett found that the ACCC failed to afford Telstra procedural fairness and natural justice when issuing the competition notice, thus making its decision to issue the notice illegal ... Justice Bennett found the ACCC was legally obliged to consult with Telstra before issuing the competition notice."

Telstra said the judgement meant the competition notice was invalid, allowing the telco to avoid substantial monetary penalties just short of AU$1 billion, which had accrued before the ACCC withdrew the competition notice last month.

The telco added today's judgement effectively neutered Optus's legal action.

Telstra claimed the ACCC had acted in tandem with Optus in issuing the competition notice. "The regulator was clearly duped by SingTel [Optus] into taking this illegal action.

"Today's decision is further proof that the ACCC is a rogue regulator that is biased against Telstra and thinks it is above the law. It's a sad day for Australia when the watchdog that is supposed to uphold consumers' interests and protect them from dodgy behaviour is found to be thumbing its nose at the law," Telstra said.

Telstra also claimed the ACCC had argued in the Federal Court that sections of the Trade Practices act absolved it of the need to consult with the telco before issuing the competition notice.

An Optus spokesperson said the company "is studying the judgement" while the ACCC expressed disappointment with the ruling. "The decision potentially protracts the procedural process before the ACCC can issue a competition notice. This may delay or frustrate the ACCC's ability to respond quickly to potential anti-competitive conduct.

"It may also provide the recipient of a notice with incentives to challenge procedural aspects instead of addressing the substantive underlying conduct. The ACCC will assess the full impact of the decision on the application of the law and options to address any impediments in its effective operation," the regulator said in a statement.

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    Great! Anonymous -- 05/04/07

    I assume we will all now get better service, price and competition from Telstra then???

    I'll post my name and address so you can mail my decendants when Telstra become a ACTUAL company that plays by the rules and realises they cannot have a monopoly forever.

    Fools. Get rid of the damn americans and lets get things moving in this country! >:|

    Questionable judgement... Anonymous -- 05/04/07

    ...which beggars the question, how many shares does that judge have in Telstra?

    A minor victory Keith Styles -- 05/04/07

    Is there no end to Tel$tras monopoly behavior. Their response to this very minor win in the court is nothing more than nit picking in an attempt to belittle the ACCC and it's chief.
    Just as well I don't run the ACCC, I'd issue Tel$tra with a major fine for their wholesale overcharging and attempt to give TR an unfair advantage.

    When is the Minister going to step in and force Tel$tra to separate TW & TR?
    She should have done it months ago instead of playing politics.

    Get Real Anonymous -- 05/04/07 (in reply to #320077433)

    If TW is sooooo expensive then how come it is probably the fastest (or only) growing segment of Telstra. Why don't all the other companies build their own infrastructure across all of the country insted of only where there is a large concentrated population.

    Re: reply to other companies build their own infrastructure Anonymous -- 06/04/07 (in reply to #320077433)

    posted in the wrong place should be in reply to Get Real

    reply to other companies build their own infrastructure Anonymous -- 06/04/07

    I think they are trying to lol

    personally i wish there was at least 2 services going down everywhere without relying on each others infrastructure

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured