Telstra tells FTTN rivals to 'put up or shut up'

A high level Telstra executive has labelled other potential bidders for the proposed FTTN network as "pretenders" after it was revealed the telco suggested to the government that it attach a multi-million dollar application fee and bond to all its network tender requests.

The national carrier is campaigning to have a AU$100 million negotiation bond imposed upon all bidders for the national FTTN network, with its executive director of regulatory affairs, Dr Tony Warren telling competitors to "put their money where their mouth is".

Warren said the government should not only require a substantial surety from bidders but set out high-end benchmark criteria to identify only the most serious competitors for the project.

"We don't want any G9 pretenders stringing out the process, or half-baked proponents like OPEL slipping through with flimsy plans and meaningless 'in-kind' contributions," he said.

"It is unusual for a government to make such a large financial commitment to an FTTN project, and we don't think it should be treated by speculative bidders as a 100 percent mortgage," Warren said.

The Telstra executive proposed that the government only consider tenderers that have constructed and operated a broadband network in Australia or overseas with capital expenditure of more than AU$3 billion in the past five years, and currently manage a network with more than 500,000 customers.

Telecomms analyst Paul Budde believes the move is a "pointless distraction".

"If this is the level of debate we get when we're talking about one of the most important pieces of national infrastructure to be completed within our lifetimes then I find it appalling.

"This is just another pointless distraction that Telstra is trying to throw in the way to maintain its monopoly rather than encouraging productive debate about the potential uses for the network in e-health and education," said Budde.

Telstra's Warren said the bond is necessary because the project is "unusual" in terms of its scale: "Our suggestions are for an efficient, objective, competitive RFP process which will fulfil the Government's goal of commencing the National Broadband network build before the end of the year," he said.

However, analyst Budde remained unimpressed: "If that's honestly the only thing they can come up with then I feel very sorry for the company".

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Advertisement

Talkback 8 comments

  1. Now they are talking Jeff P -- 31/03/08

    Looks like the folk at NWAT think this article is so great they've posted just the "good bits" at
    http://nowwearetalking.com.au/

  2. put up or shut up Noel Peters -- 31/03/08

    As a potential FTTN broadband consumer I think Telstra have made a legitimate point and the government would be wise to listen.

  3. Wah wah Anonymous -- 31/03/08

    telstra are tossers.......period

    1. I might apply Anonymous -- 01/04/08

      Hey, I have some tech knowledge, Microsoft work, access to a good printer so I should be able to apply.

      Who cares that one of two things will happen:
      First, if the government are silly enough to award it to me I can hold the whole country for ransom until someone come and buys the license away for lets say $250,000,000.
      Second, I don't get awarded it but as this process must treat all parties evenly I will occupy a team of panelist's time for lets say 10 hours to read and review my submission, if there are 35 people like me around the country this will add around 10 weeks to the process.

      So Mr Wah Wah, why don't you stop making stupid comments and read the submission, this is a very good and very valid point.

  4. Standard Process In Govt tenders M@TT -- 01/04/08

    It may have escaped a lot of you, but an application fee for tenders is a standard part of government process.

    A full open tender process will give us all what we are asking for (but not necessarily what we need) - a view into the various offers and a way to measure their performance as they roll out "australia's future".

    the tender process will have mandatory and optional requirements by which the government will filter (or more correctly should be able to filter) out the crap and annoying bids.

    the criteria for selection will be published in full on the tender website and be available for all australians to see and review.

    of course this is fiction - we will never get to see the offers - we will never get to see the promises made - we will never get to be able to independently measure the promises agains the actual delivery - we will never see the back end political maneuvering.

    we will get a second rate, half caste system that will not deliver flxibility and agility that is required to return australia to the position we once held as early adopters and leadersw in technology.

    we will go from leading lights to luddites in a single term of government.

  5. Paul Budde Anthony -- 01/04/08

    I can not believe this person is taken seriously, I have never seen him come out and say anything we either didn't already know or that is unbiased towards the industry in general. He has a very bad habit of showing his true nature all too often with his negative comments towards the industry industry leaders and in particular towards Telstra. This guy is just another Rivkin, he will say anything to further his own cause and make himself look better or make money out of it.

  6. IMportant omission Clayton Brazil -- 01/04/08

    He forgot to stipulate that the company name should also start with the letter 'T' and must have 7 letter, no more, no less.

  7. FTTN ROLL OUT OH YEAH Anonymous -- 01/04/08

    1.When/How/Who too.
    Just a small point what about including the update of existing copper wire connections first.I doubt if this is even a priority because of the cost it is far to easy to use areas less than a few yrs old.
    The Soul man is far to preoccupied with profits to shareholders than a viable landbased system for all and that is it,FULL STOP.
    Soul T is not and never will be engaged in providing a national broadband network service he is quite simply a Yank and will only sevice profit areas,yanks only work wherby they can make money at the expense of others.
    This blinded bond arrangement is a smokescreen, all I can say is spot the Telsra Van in your area hehe should I post a reward for sighting!!!!!.
    Just remember what Soul man did for US West in the USA ( they renamed it cos of him) and the same damage is now here.The guy is a prick.

    Regards Wayne Bunbury
    PS have seen 1 van emm a year ago in Mandurah lol.

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Angus Kidman Storage infrastructure on the tender track
    For a large-scale storage project, it's not uncommon to go out to tender for the best deal — but when was the last time you had to put together a tender for a document management room?
  • Array Apple has killed the video store; will ISPs be next?
    The Olympics are nearly over, and the Australian team deserves kudos for an excellent performance all around. Yet even as the Olympic sun sets on the Bird's Nest for the last time this weekend, millions of spectators around the world will be scanning their dials in the hope of finding something else to fill their viewing hours.
  • Array Conroy's filtering plan: security worries
    Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has welcomed "improvements" in ISP filtering technologies, but will a broad-scale roll-out make ISPs a thief's favourite target?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured