Our content licensing agreement with AAP stipulates that the material must be taken down 30 days from the date of publication. Therefore this particular story, having exceeded that time frame, has expired. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Our content licensing agreement with AAP stipulates that the material must be taken down 30 days from the date of publication. Therefore this particular story, having exceeded that time frame, has expired. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Malcolm Turnbull's ghost twitterer
At the Sydney Media140 conference several weeks ago, Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull admitted he doesn't pe… Watch it now
Google Chrome OS demonstration
Vice President of Product Marketing Sundar Pichai gives a virtual tour of Google's new operating system, Chrom… Watch it now
Surf the Net like it's 1991 with Gopher
The old Gopher protocol is not dead. In fact, it even has Twitter! Here's how to access it.… Watch it now
All I want for Xmas is Telstra pricing
Sick of broken tender sites
Cyberwar: What is it good for?
What makes you click?
Tell us for a chance to win a $1,000 GAME gift voucher.
Click here for more.
Optus Deal
Broadband + home phone + PlayStation®3 in a single package price!
Click here for more!
Best Laptops
Check out the best laptops here!
Click here for more.
There is only one way to future-proof telecommunications in Australia and that is by separating the infrastruture from the rest of the Telstra business.
That would provide two major benefits. It would provide an infratructure that is open to ALL telcos on a level playing field where everyone pays the same for using the infrastructure, instead of one creaming $$ off the others for use of *its* infrastructure - an infrastructure that was paid for by the people of Australia. It would also ensure that the heavily used areas of the infrastructure would subsidise the less heavily used areas - the only real way to ensure equity of service, but one that goes against the current government's user pays strategy.
Let's learn a lesson from the mobile phone networks debacle. An independent company should have been appointed to provide a network of phone towers right across the country and individual telcos would then have been able to rent space on the towers according to their needs. Those companies that provide the best coverage for their client base, will get the business. Competition is not about everyone trying to do the same thing, it's about finding a niche market and providing outstanding service to its clients.
Before we rush into this sale, let's again consider what is best for the Australian public, wherever they live. Providing equality in communications infrastructure and service is much more important than making $$ for govt coffers or creaming off $$ for shareholders.
Just look at the example of public transport - what incentive is there for companies to service the unprofitable routes? Equally, what incentive is there for Telstra to service its unprofitable areas? The simple answer is none - and that's why, like a privatised public transport infrastructure, a privatised telecommunications infrastructure will also fall apart.