Telstra's WiMax case against Coonan thrown out

By Jo Best, ZDNet Australia
11 October 2007 05:24 PM
Tags: wimax, telstra, optus, opel, helen coonan, funds, court, case

Telstra today lost its court battle to see confidential documents belonging to Communications Minister Helen Coonan, which related to a government decision to allocate almost AU$1 billion to a rival.

In the Federal Court today, Justice Peter Graham dismissed Telstra's application and ordered it to pay the Minister's costs.

In his judgement, Justice Graham said: "It is certainly arguable that part of Telstra's motivation for bringing the current application is to achieve some measure of publicity for its cause and its criticism of what has been referred to as foreign aid for Singapore."

Telstra had taken the Minister to court seeking documents pertaining to how the government had chosen the winning bidder to build a WiMax network across the bush.

Coonan said in June that it had selected OPEL, a joint venture between Optus and Elders, to build the bush WiMax network and that the funding for the project had been increased to AU$1 billion, up from the AU$600 million originally earmarked for the scheme.

Telstra alleged that only the winning bidder, OPEL, was made aware of the funding increase during the tender process.

A spokesperson for the Minister's office told ZDNet Australia: "The judgement today speaks for itself. For the government, we welcomed Telstra's participation in the Australian Broadband Guarantee and that's really the way forward."

Telstra's group general counsel, Will Irving, said that the government's decisions on the WiMax network remained mired in secrecy.

"It shouldn't be this hard to find out why the Australian government spent AU$1 billion of taxpayers' money supporting a Singapore-backed proposal that didn't even achieve the government's stated aims," he said in a statement.

While access to the Minister's documents has been denied, Telstra still has the option to pursue further legal action.

"We will be closely analysing the judgment before determining our next legal steps," Irving said.

AAP contributed to this story.

Advertisement

Talkback 6 comments

    Telstra are pathetic, sour losers. ****ed off Telstra Shareholder -- 11/10/07

    They put in a bid DESIGNED TO FAIL, and they failed.

    They cried like a baby when the Optus-Elders consortium won, because they put in a valid bid, which will be good for rural Australians.

    Telstra's board are an absolute disgrace.

    I look forward to my OPEL $40 high-speed WiMAX connection in 18 months time, because I've been waiting on ADSL for years, and TLS just DON'T CARE!

    Good luck Anonymous -- 11/10/07 (in reply to #320087680)

    Hope your $40 service is as good as the foundations it was built on... Hot air

    Re: Good Luck Grump -- 12/10/07 (in reply to #320087682)

    "Hot Air" An apt description of Telstra's 98% coverage next G wireless BB during my trial here on the NSW Mid Nth Coast.
    And ONLY $185/month for a whopping great 3GB...how can they afford it?
    G.

    Absolutely Agree... Anonymous -- 12/10/07 (in reply to #320087680)

    If Telstra were really interested in being a decent telco they would get on with the job of providing service rather than wasting time in court and wasting time with those crappy, non factual ads about how great our phone service is. Great perhaps compared to some third world nation perhaps? Telstra? 98% bull.

    I'll have 2 years of great Next G, you can wait Tony Arnold -- 12/10/07 (in reply to #320087931)

    My work was running an Optus private network and were not looking at changing but as soon as we tested the Next G we immediately saw the benefits. I am one of about 200 people at my work using Next G on laptops and PDA's.

    I've been using this brilliant service running voice, a PDA as well as a Next G router at the remote company site I work at. We had had no choice but to use satellite for data until we switched.

    The VPN through the router works reliably to head office, my PDA allows me to stay connected when I am walking around company site.

    My boss is happy to pay $200 per month for the router and another 80 per month for the data on the PDA to improve my productivity by at least an hour each day.

    The reason we switched was not 98% bull but an estimated $1,000,000 each year in productivity improvements.

    I would be more then happy to not use Telstra if any other company was willing to invest in our area but they are not.

    $1B of tax payers money Anonymous -- 12/10/07

    How can 1B of tax payers money be spent on an inferior network with no public scrutiny. This is a sham. Coonan is a fool and she will be out of a job soon. Let the market drive the competition, not the govt.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • David Braue Forget the NBN, 100Mbps is already here
    Telstra and TransACT will shortly begin offering 100Mbps broadband to many customers. By moving early, the companies have not only raised the bar for Australia's broadband services, but thrown down a challenge to a government that now faces increased pressure to deliver the NBN as promised.
  • Array IT: Govt's cost-cutting bitch
    The government needs to stop looking at IT as a necessary evil or the place to remove costs when the Treasurer comes calling.
  • Array Can complaints on mobile content be cut?
    On 1 July this year the new Mobile Premium Services Code was introduced. It sounds like it's had a good impact, but is it enough?
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured