Telstra rivals welcome watchdog's notice

Telstra's competitors have welcomed a move by the nation's competition regulator to restrain what it sees as anti-competitive pricing behaviour, but the heavyweight claims its prices are "fair and justified".

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) issued a notice to Telstra last night claiming the carrier acted anti-competitively in its implemention of a wholesale line rental price increase on its "Home Access" product in December.

The so-called "Part A competition notice" allows third-parties to take legal action to recover loss or damages resulting from an anti-competitive activity.

Those affected by the December price change applauded the ACCC's move.

"The ACCC has acted appropriately in issuing the competition notice against Telstra," a spokesperson from the nation's second-largest telco Optus said in an e-mailed statement.

"Telstra needs to be called to account for its intimidating behaviour and Telstra's new management must learn what the rules in Australia are."

The Competitive Carrier's Coalition (CCC), a group representing tier-two carriers Macquarie Telecom, PowerTel, Primus, iiNet, Hutchison Telecoms, TransACT and Agile Communications agreed.

"The ACCC was to be congratulated for standing up to Telstra's bullying tactics and anti-competitive behaviour by issuing a competition notice today," the CCC said in a statement issued last night.

"It is crucial that the ACCC now act quickly to follow up today's move by taking court action to have Telstra fined for its behaviour," CCC executive director David Forman said in the statement.

iiNet's general manager of regulatory affairs Steve Dalby told ZDNet Australia in a telephone interview today his company was cooperating with the ACCC on the issue.

"We've been involved with discussions with the ACCC since around around Christmas I guess, when Telstra made that change to its pricing structure," he said. "We'll continue to help them with their enquiries."

However Telstra said its December price increase was "fair and justified", and the issue was not as simple as it appeared.

Telstra's group manager of regulatory affairs Dr Tony Warren said competitors commonly used the Home Access product as just one component of a larger bundle of services to customers.

"Over the bundle there is sufficient margin," Telstra's statement said.

"The ACCC contends there are competition issues in the Home Access charge because access in itself is not profitable," said Warren.

"It's like saying a sandwich shop should profit on every ingredient used in a salad sandwich when common sense says only the overall margin matters."

"The ACCC's decision to issue a competition notice is not a finding of guilt, nor does it imply the matter will automatically be adjudicated by a court," pointed out Warren.

"However, Telstra is prepared to strongly defend its position," he added.

Advertisement

Talkback 2 comments

    ACCC v's Telstra Anonymous -- 14/04/06 (in reply to #120132770)

    More "ho-hum".
    I'm starting to think that the ACCC are about as incompetent as Telstra !!
    How many times have we heard about the big tough ACCC going in to bat against the Ogre telco, winning the court room fiasco (at what co$t to the taxpayer ??) and Telstra does what it has continued to do for years - NOTHING !!!
    Telstra knows it has nothing to fear from the ACCC, or anyone else so it plays the game, goes to court, looks contrite, and whispers an over-the-shoulder "get stuffed" at everyone as it walks away from the courthouse !!
    The joke is continually on us all.
    Completely pathetic state of affairs.

    re: more ho-hum Renai LeMay -- 20/04/06 (in reply to #120132771)

    hi there,

    It is true that some in the telecommunications industry see the ACCC as ineffectual.

    This is esactly what I wrote about in <a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Will_Telstra_get_another_parking_fine_/0,2000061791,39251354,00.htm">this commentary piece</a>.

    However I think Telstra's appeals to the federal government to change Australia's regulatory regime on telecommunications reveal just how much they believe in the power of the ACCC.

    Why else would they be appealing to big brother?

    It will be interesting to see what action the ACCC takes in the succeeding months though, with issues including the ULL, the line rental competition notice and the fibre to the node proposal being debated.

    Cheers,

    Renai LeMay
    News Journalist
    ZDNet Australia

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Suzanne Tindal Sick of broken tender sites
    Some of the state governments desperately need to invest in more user-friendly tender sites so that looking for information on government tenders doesn't have to be a game of blind man's bluff.
  • Array Cyberwar: What is it good for?
    In this week's episode, Cyberwar. What is Australia's place in the world of digital warfare? What are the implications for the NBN?
  • Array Is wholesale-only backhaul just a pipedream?
    The potential acquisition of Pipe Networks by SP Telemedia has raised the question about whether vertically integrated backhaul providers will mean higher wholesale prices for ISP customers.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured